Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 11: Measurement and data processing Objectives: 11.1 Uncertainty and error in measurement 11.2 Uncertainties in calculated results 11.3 Graphical.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 11: Measurement and data processing Objectives: 11.1 Uncertainty and error in measurement 11.2 Uncertainties in calculated results 11.3 Graphical."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 11: Measurement and data processing Objectives: 11.1 Uncertainty and error in measurement 11.2 Uncertainties in calculated results 11.3 Graphical techniques

2 (a) Random and systematic error Systematic errors arise from a problem in the experimental set-up that results in the measured values always deviating from the “true” value in the same direction, that is, always higher or always lower. Examples of causes of systematic error are non-calibration of a measuring device or poor insulation in calorimetry experiments. Your system needs calibrating/fixing/changing

3 Random errors arise from the imprecision of measurements and can lead to readings being above or below the “true” value. Random errors can be reduced with the use of more precise measuring equipment or its effect minimized through repeat measurements so that the random errors cancel out

4 (b) Accuracy and precision Accuracy is how close a measured value is to the correct value, whereas precision indicates how many significant figures there are in a measurement. Precision is a measure of the random error. If the precision is high, the the random error is small. If an experiment is accurate, then the systematic error is very small.

5 For example, a mercury thermometer could measure the normal boiling temperature of water as 99.5° C (±0.5° C) whereas a data probe recorded it as 98.15° C (±0.05° C). In this case the mercury thermometer is more accurate whereas the data probe is more precise.

6 (c) Uncertainties in raw data When numerical data is collected, values cannot be determined exactly, regardless of the nature of the scale or the instrument. If the mass of an object is determined with a digital balance reading to 0.1 g, the actual value lies in a range above and below the reading. This range is the uncertainty of the measurement.

7 . If the same object is measured on a balance reading to 0.001 g, the uncertainty is reduced, but it can never be completely eliminated. When recording raw data, estimated uncertainties should be indicated for all measurements.

8 There are different conventions for recording uncertainties in raw data. Random errors are expressed as an uncertainty range, such as 25.05 ± 0.05ml The uncertainty of an analogue scale is ±(half the smallest division) The uncertainty of a digital scale is ±(the smallest scale division)

9 Uncertainties in calculated results The number of significant figures in any answer should reflect the number of significant figures in the given data. When data is multiplied or divided, the answer should be quoted to the same number of significant figures as the least precise. When data is added or subtracted, the answer should be quoted to the same number of decimal places as the least precise.

10 (d) Propagating errors When adding or subtracting measurements, the total absolute uncertainty is the sum of the absolute uncertainties. When multiplying or dividing measurements, the total percentage uncertainty is the sum of the individual percentage uncertainties. The absolute uncertainty can then be calculated from the percentage uncertainty.

11 If one uncertainty is much larger than others, the approximate uncertainty in the calculated result can be taken as due to that quantity alone. The experimental error in a result is the difference between the recorded value and the generally accepted or literature value. Percentage uncertainty = (absolute uncertainty/measured value) x 100% Percentage error = (accepted value – experimental value)/accepted value)x100% Note: A common protocol is that the final total percent uncertainty should be cited to no more than one significant figure if it is greater than or equal to 2% and to no more than two significant figures if it is less than 2%.

12 Graphical techniques determine from graphs physical quantities (with units) by measuring and interpreting a slope (gradient) or intercept. When constructing graphs from experimental data, students should make an appropriate choice of axes and scale, and the plotting of points should be clear and accurate. (Millimetre square graph paper or software is appropriate. Quantitative measurements should not be made from sketch graphs.)

13 The uncertainty requirement can be satisfied by drawing best-fit curves or straight lines through data points on the graph (data collection and processing: aspect 3). (Note: Chemistry students at SL and HL are not expected to construct uncertainty bars on their graphs


Download ppt "Chapter 11: Measurement and data processing Objectives: 11.1 Uncertainty and error in measurement 11.2 Uncertainties in calculated results 11.3 Graphical."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google