Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArleen Aubrey Long Modified over 9 years ago
1
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 1 08.04.2005 Fluxgate Magnetometer Michael Ludlam University of California - Berkeley
2
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 2 08.04.2005 Qualification FGS Vibration and TV test levels Parameters checked before and after tests Test procedure after integration of FGE and FGS 8 test/calibration steps performed in Berlin, Braunschweig, Jeserigerhütten and Graz FGE modification and re-tests done in Berkeley Exchange of amplifiers Analogue checkout Design verification Remaining tasks FGM F4 Test Report
3
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 3 08.04.2005 Vibration Specs. Acceptance performed in Berlin Sine wave: up to 6.4g @ 50Hz Random noise: 11.7g RMS TV-cycle Performed in Graz Two cycles between -120°C and 90°C Parameter check (before, between and after tests) Resistance of all coils / Sensor output signals Coil constants and mechanical alignment of feedback coil system FGS qualification
4
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 4 08.04.2005 digital functional test check of board population, FPGA and current sources Nov. 01. Berlin, THM_FGM_F6StartupTest.doc analogue adjustment of FGS and FGE Test of excitation,input filter, phase adjustment, sensitivity and noise Nov. 05. Berlin, THM_FGM_F4AnalogTest.doc Parameters vs. electronics temperature Test of offset, sensitivity, inrush current, phase in dependency on e-temp. Nov. 06. Braunschweig, THM_FGM_Cal_F4e-temp.doc Parameters vs. sensor temperature Test of offset, sensitivity and noise in dependency on sensor temperature Nov. 14. Graz, THM_FGM_Cal_F4s-temp.doc Test performed with F4
5
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 5 08.04.2005 test of non-linearity Test of DAC non linearity and filter characteristics Nov. 18. Graz, THM_FGM_Cal_F4&F6linearity.doc Earth field registration Test of resolution and stability by comparison of F4 and F6 measuring Earth field variations Nov. 19. Jeserigerhütten, THM_FGM_Cal_F4&F6RegJH.doc determination of sensor axis direction Direction of magnetic axis determined with respect to mechanical ref. frame Nov. 22. Jeserigerhütten, THM_FGM_Cal_F4&F6AlignmentJH.doc determination of scale value and orthogonality Scale values and orthogonality check vs. sensor temp. in coil system Nov. 24 Magnetsrode, THM_FGM_Cal_F4&F6_MR.doc Test performed with F4
6
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 6 08.04.2005 The absolute stability of the FGM shall be less than 1nT MRD requirements Dependency on sensor temp. 2nT/170°C !!! Dependency on electronics temp. without feedback circuitry: 1nT/80°C with feedback circuitry: 10nT/80°C & (noisy at 60°C) Action: AD648 identified as not ideal, replaced by RH1013 Temperature drift at maximum values of data sheet noise at 60°C not specified in data sheet
7
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 7 08.04.2005 The relative stability of the FGM shall be less than 0.2nT/12hrs FGM Parameter
8
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 8 08.04.2005 FGM Parameter The FGM noise level @ 1Hz shall be less than 0.03nT/sqrt(Hz) 0.01nT/Sqrt(Hz) 0.03nT/Sqrt(Hz)
9
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 9 08.04.2005 The FGM digital resolution shall be less than 0.1nT The FGM science range shall exceed 0-1000nT FGM Parameter Test shows Earth field variation with a resolution better 0.1nT @ a back ground field of 12000nT
10
IDPU F1 Test Review FGM- 10 08.04.2005 FGE modification and re-tests done in Berkeley Exchange of amplifiers + Analogue checkout AD648 replaced by RH1013 No noise dependency on temperature anymore Temperature dependency with and without feedback circuitry about 1nT/80°C Design verification By SFT before and after each test step Check of commanding, different modes, noise and scale values Remaining tasks Verification of housekeeping values Spot shielding / removing of test points FGM F4 Test Report
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.