1. Conclusions Scope: more flexible, decide each year (pollutants, countries) Timing : August-October Reports: Overview report necessary, incl recommendations for next year. Streamline individual reports. Resource requirements: decrease review frequency - increase for emission center (2 alternatives) Review experts: nomination by parties for formal process. Reporting process: report independently

2. Next steps Discussion and agreement on Stage 3 process in Dessau Revisions/adjustments based on this meeting Put into "Methods and procedures" document by mid June for presentation at the EMEP SB beginning of September - EB endorses in December Implementation of the review process: in the 2008 workplan

3. 2008 work plan Process for nomination of reviewers Streamline review reports Volunteers for case study of stage 3 development Develop guidelines for review (Build on experiences and documentation from trial review in 2006) Initial Review plan Review resources (already) available? Further development of stage 2

4. 2008 work plan, Stage 2 IEF tests are preferred if activity data (resources) are available, Cross pollutant tests – in lack of IEF. –Agriculture + transport, discard –C&I, suggestions for some tests Format and background info – average information useful –excel preferred + add information e.g. on NFR codes