1. © Study Of The Miscibility And Mechanical Properties Of NBR/HNBR Blends Hussein, IA; Chaudhry, RA; Sharkh, BFA JOHN WILEY SONS INC, POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE; pp: 2346-2352; Vol: 44 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals http://www.kfupm.edu.sa Summary In this study, hydrogenated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (HNBR, ZETPOL-2010L) and nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR, NIPOL-DN4555) were blended at different ratios in a Haake melt blender at 130degreesC. The HNBR and the NBR were of very similar acrylonitrile content and Mooney viscosity. The melt miscibility and solid- state properties were investigated by rheological, thermal, and mechanical testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. The dynamic viscosity of the blends followed the log-additivity rule, while the flow activation energy closely followed the inverse additivity rule. On the other hand, the storage modulus showed synergistic effects at all compositions, suggesting the presence of emulsion morphology at both ends of the composition range. For the 50/50 HNBR/NBR blend, the SEM micrographs suggest a uniform elongated structure. The thermal analysis showed the presence of two glass transitions, representing the pure components, at all blend ratios. suggesting the absence of segmental miscibility of the blends. The small-strain mechanical properties such as tensile modulus and yield stress followed linear additivity. However, HNBR and HNBR-rich blends were observed to strain harden at a rate higher than that of NBR. Induced crystallization of HNBR was suggested to be the reason for the strain hardening. The different rheological, thermal, and mechanical testing techniques agree in suggesting that the structurally similar HNBR and NBR are not thermodynamically miscible but mechanically compatible. (C) 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers. References: Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa

2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. © AHN SJ, 2000, J APPL POLYM SCI, V78, P1861 ANTHONY P, 1997, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V7, P376 BHATTACHARJEE S, 1997, HDB ENG POLYM MAT BOISSERIE C, 1977, J POLYM SCI POL PHYS, V15, P1211 BRAHIMI B, 1991, J RHEOL, V35, P1069 BROWN RP, 1986, PHYS TESTING RUBBER CHAUDHRY RA, 2004, THESIS KFUPM DHAHRAN CHEE MJK, 2002, POLYMER, V43, P1235 CHUNG O, 1997, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V70, P781 CLARKE J, 2000, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V74, P1 CORAN AY, 1985, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V58, P1014 DASILVA ALN, 2002, POLYM TEST, V21, P647 HAMEED T, 2002, POLYMER, V43, P6911 HOFMANN W, 1963, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V37, P52 HUSSEIN IA, 2003, MACROMOLECULES, V36, P2024, DOI 10.1021/ma0257245 16. JHA A, 1997, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V70, P798 17. LEE JH, 2000, POLYM J, V32, P321 18. PAUL DR, 2001, POLYM BLENDS 19. SAHA S, 2001, EUR POLYM J, V37, P2513 20. SAHA S, 2001, EUR POLYM J, V37, P399 21. SCHOLZ P, 1989, J RHEOL, V33, P481 22. SCHULZ DN, 1982, RUBBER CHEM TECHNOL, V55, P809 23. SETUA DK, 2002, POLYM ENG SCI, V42, P10 24. SEVERE G, 2000, J APPL POLYM SCI, V78, P1521 25. SIRISINHA C, 2001, J APPL POLYM SCI, V85, P1232 26. UTRACKI LA, 1989, POLYM ALLOGY BLENDS 27. ZHU SH, 1999, POLYM ENG SCI, V39, P1998 For pre-prints please write to: ihussein@kfupm.edu.sa Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa