Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStanley Higgins Modified over 9 years ago
1
Financial Partnerships Unit Market Issues Andrew Caskie Project Adviser, Financial Partnerships Unit
2
Overview Tranches 1 & 2 17 projects currently in procurement. 10 projects still to be advertised. Mix of larger and smaller project values. Non-Profit Distributing Organisation (NPDO) structure in procurement in Argyll & Bute. Two to follow.
3
Private sector perspective Market Attractive projects across UK. FPU committed to Scottish interest. Schools PPP quarterly programme on website. Openness – regular meetings with market. SE Capital Investment Plan - early 2005.
4
Competition - VfM Value for Money best achieved through competitive bids. 3 consortia ideal for ITN. Competition has been limited, but continually improving. Competition not assured – no room for complacency.
5
Nature of consortia Initially larger firms heading up consortia. Some notable successes and failures. Now growth in smaller local players grouping together. Growing international interest – Germany, Denmark, Iceland, Singapore, America, etc.
6
Construction Constraints on capacity / programmes usually construction driven. Content of projects crucial – balance between new build and refurbishment. Market has strong preference for new build.
7
Funders Increasing role of bond finance. FPU has no bias. Value for money is key. Healthy development. Programme impact should be monitored. Pros and cons of both bank and bond finance. Minimum bond value fallen from £100m to £80m.
8
Funders (cont.) Need to manage outstanding risks early. Early involvement of funders. Sign-up to SSSC v3. Funders’ due diligence increasingly robust. Is the project clean and safe – risk premia proportional to “danger level”.
9
Facilities Management SE guidance/protocol allows possibility of some FM elements to remain in-house. Private sector seeking to provide wholly integrated solution –clear interface is needed.
10
Facilities Management (cont.) Recent cases submitted to exclude soft FM features from projects, through protocol. Wider implications should be considered.
11
Attractive projects Not just based on scope: Council behaviour is key. Respect in partnership approach. Advisers appointed in good time. Committed, efficient and informed client.
12
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.