Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SHALLOW FOUNDATION BY KARTHIVELU.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SHALLOW FOUNDATION BY KARTHIVELU."— Presentation transcript:

1 SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SHALLOW FOUNDATION BY KARTHIVELU

2 Basic Definitions  Footing: Part of foundation that transmit the load directly to soil.  Foundation : Part of structure which is in direct contact with & transmit load to ground.  Foundation soil: Upper part of earth mass that carrying the load of the structure.

3 Basic Definitions Foundation Footing Foundation soil

4 Bearing capacity Pressure intensityUltimate BCSafe BC GrossTotal pressure at base of footing due to wt of super strct, self wt of foundation & earth fill (q) The minimum q at which soil fails by shear (q f ) Maximum pressure, soil can carry without risk of shear failure q s = q ns + Y D Netpressure at base of footing due to wt of super strct, self wt of foundation q n = q - Y D The minimum q n at which soil fails by shear (q nf ) = q f - Y D q ns = q nf / F

5  Allowable bearing capacity q a : The net loading intensity at which the soil fails neither by shear nor by settlement

6 Modes of shear Failure Vesic (1973) classified shear failure of soil under a foundation base into three categories depending on the type of soil & location of foundation. 1) General Shear failure. 2) Local Shear failure. 3) Punching Shear failure

7 Modes Of Shear Failure

8 General shear failure Local shear failure Punching shear failure FAILURE SURFACE Well defined, reaching upto ground surface Clearly defined only immediately below the footing No failure pattern is observed. Vertical & follows the pattern of base BULGINGmoreslightnil FAILURESudden & accomplished with tilting of footing Not sudden & no tilting. Only large settlement Only very large settlement ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY Well definedNot well defined RELATIVE DENSITY OF SOIL high35% to 75 %< 35% EXIn Very dense sand in shallow footing In High compressible soil In soft clay

9 Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Analysis Terzaghi (1943) analysed a shallow continuous footing by making some assumptions.

10 Plastic Zones Of Failure

11  The failure zones do not extend above the horizontal plane passing through base of footing  The equilibrium occurs when the down ward pressure exerted by loads on the soil adjoining the inclined surfaces on soil wedge is equal to upward pressure.  Downward forces are due to the load (=qu× B) & the weight of soil wedge (1/4 γB 2 tanØ)  Upward forces are the vertical components of resultant passive pressure (Pp) & the cohesion (c’) acting along the inclined surfaces.

12

13 q u B= 2[ (Pp) r +(Pp) c +(Pp) q ]+ BCtanø-¼ γ B 2 tanø Substituting; 2 (Pp) r - ¼rB 2 tanø = B × ½ γ BN r 2 (Pp) q = B × γ D N q & 2 (Pp) c + BC tanø = B × C N c ; We get, q u =CN c + γ D N q + 0.5 γ B N γ This is Terzaghi’s Bearing capacity equation for determining ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing. Where N c, N q & N r are Terzaghi’s bearing capacity factors & depends on angle of shearing resistance (ø)

14

15 ASSUMPTIONS 1. soil is homogeneous, isotropic & its shear strength is represented by Coulomb’s equation. 2. Strip footing has a rough base, & the problem is two dimensional. 3. The elastic zone has straight boundaries inclined at ø to horizontal & plastic zone is fully developed. 4. Pp has 3 components which can be computed and added separately. 5. The failure zones do not extend above the horizontal plane passing through base of footing

16 LIMITATIONS  As soil compresses, Ø changes  Slight downward movement of footing does not develop fully plastic zones  Error due to assumption 4 is small  Error due to assumption 5 increases with depth of foundation. Hence suitable for shallow foundation.

17 Important points : * Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity equation is applicable for general shear failure. * Terzaghi has suggested following empirical reduction to actual c & ø in case of local shear failure Mobilised cohesion C m = 2/3 C Mobilised angle of ø m = tan –1 (⅔tanø) Thus, N c ’,N q ’ & N r ’ are B.C. factors for local shear failure q u = C m N c ’+ γ D N q ’ + 0.5 γ B N r ’

18

19


Download ppt "SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SHALLOW FOUNDATION BY KARTHIVELU."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google