1. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Campus Issues Martin Price, EUNIS Jean-Paul le Guigner, CRU, France Amsterdam 8 May 2007

2. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Issues For Investigation Campus Bottlenecks Providing Network Services Rollout of IPv6 Training Network Staff Collaboration at Campus and National level

3. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 CAMPUS Panel Rogelio Montanana, Valencia University, Spain Michael Nowlan, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Ligia Ribeiro, Porto University, Portugal Martin Sutter, SWITCH, Switzerland Plus Jim Buddin, TERENA Jean-Paul le Guigner, CRU, Rennes, France Martin Price, EUNIS, UK

4. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Online Survey Targeted at Heads of campus IT services Took place in early March 2007 Circulated via: –EUNIS mail lists –NREN contacts of connected organisations –National organisations –TERENA lists

5. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Areas of Survey Campus Infrastructures Network Services Governance/Funding Networking Expertise Collaboration

6. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Survey Findings - 1 Diversity of community Wide-ranging connection rates Few campus bottlenecks Some over-restrictive security Videoconferencing widely available

7. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Survey Findings - 2 Networking policy –Non-existent in some institutions –Little formal input from user community Networking staff –Wide spectrum of staffing levels –Recruitment/retention difficulties –Retraining problems (funding, career development plans) Not much collaboration between institutions

8. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Observations / Questions - 1 Coherent institutional networking policies –Includes appropriate funding Levels of security –Difficult to find right balance Promote awareness of services available –At all levels including end-users, technicians, policy makers

9. The EARNEST Foresight Study 2006 - 2007 Observations / Questions - 2 Network support staff –Increase numbers –Improve level of expertise –Limiting factor may be people not hardware Collaboration –Within institutions –Between institutions –With ‘intermediate’ networks, NRENs, etc