Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAleesha Adams Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Inclusive production of neutral mesons in ALICE Outline Motivation Experimental apparatus Results Summary Adam Matyja for the ALICE Collaboration Subatech, Nantes Cracow Epiphany Conference On the first year of the LHC 10 - 12 January 2011 Kraków, Poland
2
2 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Motivation Electromagnetic calorimeters offer a possibility to identify photons and neutral mesons in a wide p T range Charged hadrons identification limited to low p T Inclusive meson production spectrum is a good probe for pQCD and necessary for direct photons search Neutral hadrons, detected via their photonic decays, carry information about medium Studies of transport properties of quark-gluon matter Initial gluon density constraint of parameters of theoretical models in both perturbative (NLO, NNLO) and non-perturbative regime (structure function, fragmentation function) Measurements in pp collisions give reference data to compare with AA 's from neutral meson decays are background for other processes - jet studies
3
3 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Experience from RHIC 0, and direct photons in AA collisions from PHENIX The first evidence of a parton energy loss in a quark-gluon matter R AA scales with N part What is expected at LHC energies? arXiv:0806.0261v1 (2008) PHENIX, QM2008 Motivation
4
4 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja / 0 ratio in pp and AA collisions Ratio is universal for a wide energy range Needed for nuclear transport models PHENIX, PRC 75, 024909 (2007) f(m T )=(m T +a) -n, a=1.2, n=10-14 ALICE capabilities: Large p T region Both pp and Pb-Pb measurement Motivation
5
5 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja ALICE detector EMCAL PHOS CTS = ITS + TPC Experimental apparatus
6
6 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja EMCal 12 Modules per Strip Module 24 Strip Modules per Super Module Shashlik technology Tower - 77 layers: Pb - 1.4 mm Scintillator - 1.7 mm Size - 6 6 25 cm 3 Module (2 2 towers) Geometry 4/10 Super Modules are installed Next 6 are being installed in Dec. 2010 - Jan. 2011 24 48 towers in each Super Module Coverage: | | < 0.7, 80 o < < 120 o Distance to IP: 4.5 m Material budget from IP: 0.8 X 0 Energy range: 0 < E < 250 GeV Energy resolution: 10 Super Modules in EMCal Experimental apparatus
7
7 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja PHOS Technology Crystal of lead tungstate (PbWO 4 ) Size: 2.2 2.2 18 cm 3 Geometry 3/5 Super Modules are installed 1 more expected in 2012 64 56 crystals in each Super Module Coverage: | | < 0.13 260 o < < 320 o Distance to IP: 4.6 m Material budget from IP: 0.2 X 0 Energy range: 0 < E < 100 GeV Energy resolution: CPV (not installed yet) Crystals Experimental apparatus CPV - charged particle veto
8
8 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja CTS = ITS + TPC 5 m 2.5 m CTS energy resolution: E/E 2% TPC: Diameter Length : 5 m 5 m Acceptance: = 2 , | |<0.9 Readout chambers: 72 Pad readout (3 types): 557 568 Drift field: 400 V/cm Maximum drift time: 94 s Central electrode HV: 100 kV Gas: Active volume: 90 m 3 Ne-CO 2 -N 2 : 85.7% - 9.5% - 4.8% ITS: Layout 2 layers of pixel detectors 2 layers of drift detectors 2 layers of strip detectors Acceptance: = 2 , | |<0.9 Experimental apparatus
9
9 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Method Three ways of neutral meson ( , 0 ) measurement via invariant mass analysis in ALICE → photon pairs or external conversion electrons h → + (PHOS, EMCAL) h → (→e + e - ) + (→e + e - ) (CTS) Distribution of conversions Reconstructed 0 candidate through conversions Results
10
10 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Data sample ALICE minimum bias trigger ALICE has collected: about 9 M pp minimum bias events @ s = 900 GeV (0.15 nb -1 ) about 800 M pp minimum bias events @ s = 7 TeV (11 nb -1 ) Reconstruction of data just after being transferred to GRID after the end of each run Presented analysis based on subset of data sample about 8 M pp minimum bias events @ s = 900 GeV (0.12 nb -1 ) about 360 M pp minimum bias events @ s = 7 TeV (4.3 nb -1 ) - PHOS about 100 M pp minimum bias events @ s = 7 TeV (1.2 nb -1 ) - CTS Results
11
11 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Analysis selection Event selection: Correct event type and interaction trigger pp interaction At least 1 hit in SPD or beam-beam interaction by V0 detectors MB event Beam-gas events suppressed offline Primary vertex: |Z| < 10 cm Photon candidate selection: PHOS N cells 3 E cl > 0.3 GeV |A| < 1 ( 0 ) or |A| < 0.7 ( ) EMCal N cells 2 E cl > 0.5 GeV ( 0 ) or E cl > 0.3 GeV ( ) |A| < 1 ( 0 ) or |A| < 0.6 ( ) Results A = (E 1 - E 2 )/(E 1 + E 2 )
12
12 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Calibration PHOS Pre-calibration: adjusting the high voltage bias to provide the same gain Accuracy: 20-50 % Equalization of the mean deposited energy per channel by events from pp collisions Accuracy: 6.5 % Equalization of 0 peak channel-by-channel Not enough statistics yet Goal accuracy: 1 % EMCAL Pre-calibration: adjusting the high voltage bias to provide the same gain Accuracy: 20 % Calibration with cosmic rays before installation Calibration with pp data using MIP signals Equalization of 0 peak channel-by-channel Current accuracy: 7 % Goal accuracy: 1 % Results
13
13 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 → invariant mass in pp PHOS EMCAL Results
14
14 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 → →e + e - e + e - invariant mass in pp Results CTS Data Combinatorial background
15
15 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja and invariant mass in pp EMCAL PHOS Results →0→0 →
16
16 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja → →e + e - e + e - invariant mass in pp Results CTS Data Combinatorial background
17
17 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 peak and width PHOS EMCAL MC/MC with realistic calibration and non-linearity (calibration ongoing) Measured 0 mass consistent with PDG value → good energy linearity above p T 6 GeV/c cluster unfolding Notice different ranges! Results CTS DATA
18
18 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja peak and width EMCAL PHOS Measured mass consistent with PDG value → good energy linearity Results CTS
19
19 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Raw 0 and spectra in PHOS Range 0.5 < p T < 5 GeV/c for pp @ s = 900 GeV Range 0.5 < p T < 20 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV Range 5 < p T < 10 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV 0 spectra spectrum Results
20
20 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Raw 0 and spectra in EMCAL Range 0.5 < p T < 20 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV Range 2.5 < p T < 20 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV 0 spectrum spectrum Results
21
21 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Raw 0 and spectra in CTS 0 range 0.4 < p T < 7 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV range 0.6 < p T < 6 GeV/c for pp @ s = 7 TeV Results
22
22 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Systematic uncertainties Raw spectra in PHOS Absolute energy scale and decalibration: 6.5 % decalibration leads to systematic error 5 % Energy non-linearity: 17 % @ p T = 1 GeV/c 1.5 GeV/c Geometrical acceptance: 2 % Raw spectrum extraction from invariant mass peaks: 2 % Conversion probability: 3.3 % Particle identification: 3 % Total: 10 % @ p T > 1.5 GeV/c Results Raw spectra in CTS Material budget: - 6.2 % Minimum p T of the electron/positron: < 2 % dE/dx of the electron/positron: < 1 % 2 for the photon reconstruction: < 2 % Track reconstruction in the TPC: < 2 % Energy assymetry of meson decay products: 1 - 2 % Backgrond calculations: 2 - 7 % Signal integration: < 0.5 % Total: 5 - 13 % in wide range + 3.3
23
23 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 production spectrum, pp @ 900 GeV L = 0.12 nb -1 Tsallis fit with: T = 0.15 N = 8.5 Data points normalized for the cross section = 50 10 mb NLO: CTEQ5M, KKP Results P. Aurenche et al., Eur. Phys. J C13, 347 (2000)
24
24 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 production spectrum, pp @ 7 TeV L PHOS = 4.3 nb -1 Tsallis fit for PHOS with: T = 0.14 N = 6.8 Data points normalized for the cross section = 67 10 mb NLO: CTEQ5M, KKP Results L CTS = 1.2 nb -1 P. Aurenche et al., Eur. Phys. J C13, 347 (2000)
25
25 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja / 0 ratio in pp @ 7 TeV (CTS) Results World data taken from Phys RevC 75(2007) 0224909 Good agreement with PYTHIA predictions and world data measured in hadron-hadron collisions
26
26 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja 0 in Pb-Pb PHOS data @ 2.76 A TeV 1.7 M minimum bias events Cluster energy E>0.3 GeV |A| < 0.7 No track extrapolated to clusters in PHOS within 10cm Requirement on dispersion axis Combinatorial background described by event mixing 0 peak well visible above background Analysis ongoing Results
27
27 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Summary and Outlook Neutral mesons 0 and are observed in ALICE calorimeters and CTS Good agreement between independent analyses Production spectra are measured in pp collisions 0 spectrum @ 900 GeV up to p T = 5 GeV/c @ 7 TeV up to p T = 25 GeV/c meson spectrum observed in pp collisons 3 < p T < 20 GeV/c in EMCAL 5 < p T < 10 GeV/c in PHOS 0.6 < p T < 6 GeV/c in CTS 0 / ratio in good agreement with previous mesurements 0 meson visible in Pb-Pb @ s = 2.76 A TeV Ongoing analyses with Pb-Pb @ s = 2.76 A TeV in a wide range 1 < p T < 10 GeV/c R AA measurement R CP measurement New components of the ALICE detector will be inserted soon
28
28 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja DCal Same towers as for EMCal, but shorter Super Modules in Acceptance (including PHOS): = 1.4 = 60 o To be installed in 2012 Experimental apparatus DCal-1 DCal-2 DCal-3
29
29 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja BACKUP
30
30 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Calculation of event rate N 0 - number of detected 0 in selected p T -bin (raw spectrum) L - luminosity T - run time Br - branching ratio C eff - geometrical acceptance C rec - reconstruction efficiency C conv - correction due to conversion loss C trig - trigger bias correction Results
31
31 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Reconstruction efficiency MC with single 0 or and flat p T distribution EMCAL 0 PHOS PHOS 0 y = 1, = 2 Results
32
32 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Reconstruction efficiency MC with single 0 and flat p T distribution |y| < 0.9, = 2 Results CTS 0
33
33 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Theory predictions Cross section in pp pp → 0 X NLO pQCD + CTEQ5M + KPP Bands indicate possible uncertainties in QCD scale P.Aurenche, et al,., Eur. Phys. J. C13,347 (2000) LO pQCD: Pythia 6 pp → X Motivation
34
34 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Expected event rates in pp ALICE PHOS pp → 0 X, 0 → pp → X, → Expected p T range of neutral meson spectrum p T < 25 GeV/c for 0 p T < 20 GeV/c for Motivation Pythia 6 NLO pQCD + CTEQ5M + KPP
35
35 10-12 January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Combined analysis (CTS+PHOS/EMCal) h → (→e + e - ) + PHOS + CTS EMCAL + CTS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.