Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySheryl Hancock Modified over 9 years ago
1
Animated Pedagogical Agents: Historical Figure Applications Bob Heller, Athabasca University bobh@athabascau.ca Mike Procter, Athabasca University mikeprocter@shaw.ca Presented at the International Workshop on Intelligent and Adaptive Web-based Education System (IAWES 2007) held in conjunction with the 15 th annual International Conference on Computers in Education, Hiroshima, Japan, November 6, 2007
2
Acknowledgements Daniel Ha – chat log analysis Lisa Jewell – chat log analysis, content developer, test chatter Meggie Yang – AIML builder Dean Mah – Web implementation Billy Cheung – Graphics, test chatter Julianna Charchun – Chat log analysis Jude Onuh – AIML programmer Funding from the Athabasca University Mission Critical Research Fund
3
Outline APA Review Historical Figure Conversational Agents Freudbot Piagetbot Animated Historical Figures Freudbot Concluding Coments
4
Animated Pedagogical Agents Definitions programs deployable on the internet with an embodied representation and interactive capabilities through one or more modalities APAs have an Artificial Intelligence backend that allows the designer to simulate communicative agent behaviour while guiding human-agent interactions towards pedagogical goals and objectives
5
Animated Pedagogical Agents Johnson, Rickel, & Lester (2000) Advantages of APA increase the “bandwidth of communication” increase computer capacity to engage and motivate The Persona effect
6
Animated Pedagogical Agents: Persona Effect Dehn & Van Mulken’s (2000) literature review Major Findings 1. User’s subjective experience yes 2. User’s objective behaviour ? 3. Performance outcomes?
7
Animated Pedagogical Agents: Persona Effect Research limitations variability in animation/visual presentation dependent measures (esp. social presence) experimental control constrained application space
8
Animated Pedagogical Agents: Persona Effect Historical Figure Applications Stronger test of the engagement function Expanded set of social roles Opportunity to use narrative Tighter synthesis between content and persona
9
Historical Figure Conversational Agents Freudbot Developed using AIML Design Principles Narrative Theory Psycholinguistic Theory with emphasis on pragmatics Content development Test chatters How much ALICE? Pilot study
10
Heller, Procter, Mah, Jewell, & Cheung (2005) Proof of concept Instructional set Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Freudbot
11
Method 53 participants (81% women) recruited through the web Random assignment to instructional set condition Focused on self-report measures of chat experience and analysis of conversational log Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Freudbot
12
Findings Neutral evaluation overall Those who would chat again (64%) had significantly higher ratings than those who would not Freudbot experience “ It was pretty cool the way it felt like I was actually interacting with Freud... he's deceased though, yeah, but the picture, the fast answers... made me pay attention to the answers alot more than if I had been simply reading a text written by someone else. Plus it was cool to feel like I could voice my own opinion with the most well-known psychoanalyst of all time.” Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Freudbot
13
Findings No effect of instructional set Historical Figure and Quizbot applications were highest rated Expansion was strongly supported Need for improvement Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Freudbot
14
Heller & Procter (2007) Developed Piagetbot based on Jean Piaget Leverage development costs of Freudbot Focused on learning outcomes under two different interfaces: Text-based vs. Chat- based Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Piagetbot
15
Method 59 participants (85% women) recruited through the web Random assignment to interface condition (text vs. chat) Focus on self report measures and learning outcomes Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Piagetbot
16
Text Interface Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Piagetbot
17
Chat Interface Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Piagetbot
18
Findings Logical interface associated with better learning outcomes. Logical interface was associated with higher ratings Piagetbot and Freudbot were equally rated Those who would chat again (60%) had significantly higher ratings than those who would not Historical Figure Conversational Agents: Piagetbot
19
Animated Historical Figures Animating the conversational agents Strong test of the engagement function of APAs Lower threshold of believability Avoids many of the visual variables Haptek Character Software – People Putty text to speech, lip sync, facial expressions, personality parameters
20
Objectives Effects of animation (no image, static image, animated image) Effects of targeting Role of learning styles Animated Historical Figures: Freudbot
21
Method 88 participants (81% women) recruited through the web Random assignment to interface condition (no image, static image, animated image) Animated Historical Figures: Freudbot
22
Preliminary Findings The no image condition associated with significantly higher ratings than the two other conditions that did not differ from each other Those who would chat again (64%) had significantly higher ratings than those who would not overall and within conditions Animated Historical Figures: Freudbot
23
Concluding Comments Animation needs to better integrated with communicative acts Room for improvement in conversational performance Across all 3 studies, appox 2/3 will chat again
24
Thank you
25
Animated Pedagogical Agents IntelliMedia Centre for Intelligent Systems – U of North Carolina http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/intellimedia/ Herman the Bug Cosmos Whizlow
26
Animated Pedagogical Agents Centre for Advanced Research on Technology in Education (CARTE) – USC http://www.isi.edu/isd/carte/ STEVE ADELE
27
Animated Pedagogical Agents Teachable Agents – Vanderbilt U http://www.teachableagents.org/overview.html Autotutor – U of Memphis http://www.autotutor.org/ Research on Innovative Technologies for Learning – Florida State U http://ritl.fsu.edu/_Website/index.asp - Pedagogical Agent Learning Systems
28
Animated Pedagogical Agents Embodied Conversational Agents - Northwestern U Media Lab – MIT http://agents.media.mit.edu/ http://agents.media.mit.edu/
29
Conversational Agents AKA Chatbots, Chatterboxes, Talk bots SmarterChild ALICE – Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity http://www.alicebot.org/
30
Conversational Agents
31
ELIZA (1966) “Its name was chosen to emphasize that it may be incrementally improved by its users, since its language abilities may be continually improved by a "teacher". Like the ELIZA of Pygmalion fame, it can be made to appear even more civilized, the relation of appearance to reality, however, remaining in the domain of the playwright.” Weizenbaum, 1966, p. 2 Like ELIZA, ALICE relies on simple pattern matching and iterative/incremental adjustments Artificial Intelligence Markup Language (AIML)
32
Conversational Agents ALICE/AIML Strengths Open source and XML compliant Numerous AIML parsers Numerous front-end options Loebner contest winner Large user group http://www.pandorabots.com http://www.pandorabots.com ALICE’s brain is free Easy language to learn
33
Conversational Agents ALICE/AIML Weaknesses Content generation Maintenance (AKA Targeting) Bending the will of ALICE Hard language to master
34
Historical Figure Application Emile http://www.hud.ac.uk/hhs/research/emile/emileframeset.htm Shakespeare http://www.pandorabots.com/pandora/talk?botid=c6937cfb3e354738
35
Discussion Historical figures vs. coaches Course Assistant Expanding the scope Quiz pal English as Second Language Teacher Speech Rehab Therapist
36
Animated Pedagogical Agents Gulz and Haake (2006) Focus on motivation & engagement as the promise of APAs & the importance visual form and look APA engagement can directly influence behaviour and cognition APAs must be believable & lifelike (like synthetic agents in entertainment applications) to maintain/strengthen the illusion of social exchange.
37
Animated Pedagogical Agents Limited range of application ‘Constrained’ by backend systems Historical Figure Applications - greater potential to maximize engagement
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.