Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHubert Tyler Modified over 8 years ago
1
1
2
2 Issues in the Design and Testing of Business Survey Questionnaires: Diane K. Willimack U.S. Census Bureau Economic Census 10 11 The International Conference on Reshaping Official Statistics What We Know Now that We Didn’t Know Then – and What We Still Don’t Know
3
3 Issues in the Design and Testing of Business Survey Questionnaires: Diane K. Willimack U.S. Census Bureau Economic Census 10 11 The International Conference on Reshaping Official Statistics Lessons from 10 Years of Pretesting Business Surveys at the U.S. Census Bureau
4
4 Outline Background –U.S. Census Bureau economic programs –Characteristics of economic surveys Response process Pretesting procedures and methodology Issues and recommendations
5
5 Economic Survey Programs at the U.S. Census Bureau More than 100 economic survey programs plus economic census Authority – mandatory vs. voluntary Data collection modes
6
6 Survey organization’s perspective –Population, data, and survey design Respondent’s perspective –Response process Characteristics of Economic Surveys
7
7 The Response Process in Economic Surveys Cognitive response model PLUS Organizational processes
8
8 Cognitive Response Model (Tourangeau, 1984) 1. Comprehension 2. Retrieval 3. Judgment 4. Communication Survey
9
9 Response Process Model for Establishment Surveys (Sudman et al., 2000 ICES-2) Organizational Aspects 4. Comprehension 5. Retrieval 6. Judgment 7. Communication 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 8. 8. Business Survey
10
10 Response Process Model for Establishment Surveys Encoding in Memory / Record Formation Selection / Identification of Respondent(s) Assessment of Priorities (Motivation) 4. Comprehension 5. Retrieval 6. Judgment 7. Communication 8. 8. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. Release of the Data Business Survey from Memory and / or Records from Memory and / or Records
11
11 Pretesting Goals Identify potential response error, e.g. --- –Question clarity –Contents of records –Response strategy Suggest improvements to survey questions
12
12 Dedicated staff Consultant – client relationship with survey programs –More than 25 separate programs plus the economic census –Variety of survey types and topics Electronic mode –Usability testing Economic Survey Pretesting at the U.S. Census Bureau
13
13 Collaborative approach Voluntary participation by respondents Site visits Post-testing follow-through Multiple rounds – test, revise, re-test Pretesting Procedures
14
14 Pretesting Methodology Qualitative research Traditional cognitive interviewing methods Adaptations –Hypothetical questions / probes –Funnel approach: general specific –Directive questions / probes In-depth unstructured interviews
15
15 Six Unresolved or Persistent Issues for Economic Surveys Consequences Methodology Shortcomings Recommendations
16
16 Issue #1: Business survey response is labor-intensive, burdensome & costly Consequences –Respondents unwilling or unable to complete a draft questionnaire prior to or during the pretest interview. –Researchers unable to use some traditional cognitive methods with draft questionnaires
17
17 Pretesting methodology –Hypothetical probes Shortcoming –Hypothetical report Actual behavior Issue #1: Business survey response is labor-intensive, burdensome & costly
18
18 Recommendations –Respondent debriefings during field period Actual behavior –“Pilot” test new questionnaires in the field Conduct respondent debriefings Evaluate data quality Issue #1: Business survey response is labor-intensive, burdensome & costly
19
19 Issue #2: “Omnibus” surveys require multiple respondents or data sources Consequences –No single “right” respondent –Hindrances to gathering data Knowledge Authority Motivation –Poor data quality
20
20 Pretesting methodology –Detailed probes about data sources and communication practices Shortcoming –Unable to meet with or interview downstream informants Issue #2: “Omnibus” surveys require multiple respondents or data sources
21
21 Recommendations –New methodologies needed to research --- Data locations Company policies and practices for exchanging data internally Strategies for internal company communication –Develop data collection procedures that encourage, facilitate and support respondents’ data-gathering Issue #2: “Omnibus” surveys require multiple respondents or data sources
22
22 Issue #3: Mismatch between survey concepts and company records Consequences –Response error –Response burden
23
23 Pretesting methodology –Directive questions Shortcoming –Cognitive interviews devolve into a hybrid of cognitive probes and exploratory questions. Issue #3: Mismatch between survey concepts and company records
24
24 Recommendations –Involve methodologists in content development –Conduct in-depth exploratory interviews to identify the “business model” for the concept of interest Use directive questions Issue #3: Mismatch between survey concepts and company records
25
25 Issue #4: Questions request technical or financial data Consequences –Methodologists subject area experts –Methodologists financial accountants –Cognitive interviews may not capture discrepancies between respondents’ answers and the intent of the question
26
26 Pretesting methodology –Collaboration between methodologists and experts in subject matter or accounting Shortcomings –Different approaches Methodologists: how the respondent answers questions without help Subject area / accounting experts: instruct respondents on how to report correctly Issue #4: Questions request technical or financial data
27
27 Recommendations –Improved collaborative methods Experts aid methodologists in developing the interview protocol Methodologists report respondent behaviors; experts assess adequacy of response Experts participate in interviews as observers Issue #4: Questions request technical or financial data
28
28 Issue #5: Many / most economic surveys are self-administered Consequences –No interviewer –Heavy reliance on questionnaire to convey technical requirements of the data request –Need for detailed instructions Business Survey
29
29 Pretesting Methodology –Probes on wording, language, visual design and placement of instructions Shortcoming –Questionnaire design cannot fix every problem Issue #5: Many / most economic surveys are self-administered
30
30 Recommendation –Encourage new paradigms in --- Questionnaire development –Top-down and bottom-up –Identify collectable data with identifiable shortcomings Use of data –Consider context and utility of reported data –Consider shortcomings in data analysis and interpretation Issue #5: Many / most economic surveys are self-administered
31
31 Issue #6: Heavy reliance on cognitive interviewing to identify and correct questionnaire problems Consequence –Improper or unrealistic expectations –Difficult to evaluate effectiveness
32
32 Pretesting Methodology –Multiple iterations of design and testing – test, revise, re-test Shortcomings –Cognitive testing is --- Qualitative methodology Somewhat artificial Issue #6: Heavy reliance on cognitive interviewing to identify and correct questionnaire problems
33
33 Recommendations –Use multiple complementary methods Helps gain confidence in results –Develop and monitor meaningful objective measurements of data quality Issue #6: Heavy reliance on cognitive interviewing to identify and correct questionnaire problems
34
34 Conclusion: 10 Years of Pretesting Business Surveys at the U.S. Census Bureau Cognitive testing –Useful –Integrated into survey development
35
35 Conclusion: The Next 10 Years of Pretesting Business Surveys Challenges –Multiple research methods –Quantitative evaluation of effectiveness –Organizational behavior and the survey response process
36
36 Thank you. Questions?? Comments?? Diane K. Willimack U.S. Census Bureau diane.k.willimack@census.gov
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.