Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.

Published byEstella Brown Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by 20inch PMTs. Num of tubes: 11146(SK-I), 5200(-II), 11129(-III,IV)  t~2m Outer Detector viewed by 1885 8inch PMTs 42 m 39.3 m 1000m (2700m.w.e.) Mt. Ikenoyama (1396m) Kamioka, Japan SK Acrylic (front) + FRP (back) SK-ISK-IISK-IIISK-IV 1996-2002-2006-2008- Elec. Upgrade

3 3 proton ,K,…   e e   / e ~ 2 @E <a few GeV cos  =-1(upgoing) L~13000km cos  =1(downgoing) L~15km cos  =0 Zenith angle distribution ~Up/Down symmetric (In the case of NO oscillation) e  Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

4  Energy spectrum of neutrino FCPCPCUP-Stopmu UP-Thrumu 4 Up-going Muons Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

5 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK5  Identify Electron-like(Showering) particles and Muon-like particles using Cherenkov ring Pattern and Angle likelihood DATA MC(ALL) MC(  CCQE) Muon Decay Electron

6 6 SK-I+II+III  –  oscillation (best fit) null oscillation Sub-GeV samples are divided to improve sensitivity to low-energy oscillation effects Live time: SK-I 1489d (FCPC) 1646d (Upmu) SK-II 799d (FCPC) 827d (Upmu) SK-III 518d (FCPC) 636d (Upmu)  -like e-like momentum Preliminary Jul. 24, 2010

7 7 Results of both zenith angle analysis and L/E analysis are consistent. SK provides the most stringent limit for sin 2 (2 θ 23 ). Results of both zenith angle analysis and L/E analysis are consistent. SK provides the most stringent limit for sin 2 (2 θ 23 ). SK-I+II+III Preliminary Zenith Physical Region (1  )  m 23 2 =2.11+0.11/-0.19 x10 -3 sin 2 2  23 >0.96 (90%C.L.) L/E Physical Region (1  )  m 23 2 =2.19+0.14/-0.13 x10 -3 sin 2 2  23 >0.96 (90%C.L.) Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

8 8 Consider both matter effect and solar term simultaneously. Matter effect: possible enhancement of e is expected in several GeV energy region and in Earth core  13 and mass hierarchy could be studied. Solar term: possible enhancement of e in sub-GeV region  23 octant degeneracy could be studied. Interference: CP phase could be studied. (when sin 2  13 >~0.05). Consider both matter effect and solar term simultaneously. Matter effect: possible enhancement of e is expected in several GeV energy region and in Earth core  13 and mass hierarchy could be studied. Solar term: possible enhancement of e in sub-GeV region  23 octant degeneracy could be studied. Interference: CP phase could be studied. (when sin 2  13 >~0.05). Matter Solar term Interference Full 3-f osc. analysis: all parameters are considered simultaneously. PRD81, 092004: either matter effect or solar term is considered with approximations (cannot test the interference part) Interference Matter effect Solar term Difference in # of electron events: (The  flux difference is also expected.) Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

9 99% C.L. 90% C.L. 68% C.L. best Excluded by CHOOZ at 90% C.L. 9 SK-I+II+III - Normal hierarchy - Preliminary 1 0.840.400 - Inverted hierarchy -.0015.0035 300.0015.0035.0015.0035.0015.0035 0 0.4 0 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

10 - Normal hierarchy - ParameterBest point90% C.L. allowed68% C.L. allowed ∆m 2 23 (x10 3 )2.11 eV 2 1.88 - 2.75 eV 2 1.99 - 2.54 eV 2 sin 2  23 0.5250.406 - 0.6290.441 - 0.597 sin 2  13 0.006< 0.066< 0.036 CP-  220º-140.8 - 297.3º - Inverted hierarchy - ParameterBest point90% C.L. allowed68% C.L. allowed ∆m 2 23 (x10 3 )2.51 eV 2 1.98 - 2.81 eV 2 2.09 - 2.64 eV 2 sin 2  23 0.5750.426 - 0.6440.501 - 0.623 sin 2  13 0.044< 0.1220.0122 - 0.0850 CP-  220º121.4 - 319.1º165.6 - 280.4º  2 min = 468.34 /416dof  2 min = 469.94 /416dof SK-I+II+III 10 No significant preference on hierarchy. No significant constraint on CP phase at 90% C.L. No significant preference on hierarchy. No significant constraint on CP phase at 90% C.L. Preliminary (sin 2  12,  m 2 12 ) are fixed at (0.304, 7.66x10 -5 eV 2 ) Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

11 Full 3-flavor (NH) (1.88<  m 2 23 <2.75) e-3 0.406 < sin 2  23 < 0.629 (0.93 < sin 2 2  23 ) Global-best (2.22<  m 2 23 <2.60) e-3 0.401 < sin 2  23 < 0.615 (0.95 < sin 2 2  23 ) 2-flavor Full 3-flavor 99%C.L. 90%C.L. 68%C.L.  2 -  2 min distributions Consistent results are obtained. No deviation of sin 2  23 from 0.5. Allowed region of  m 2 23 is a bit larger than that of the 2-flavor analysis as the effect of CP phase is also taken into account. Consistent results are obtained. No deviation of sin 2  23 from 0.5. Allowed region of  m 2 23 is a bit larger than that of the 2-flavor analysis as the effect of CP phase is also taken into account. 2-flavor (90%) Full 3-flavor (90%) 90%C.L. allowed region (1dof,  2 =  2 min +2.71) 99% C.L. 90% C.L. 68% C.L. best Jul. 24, 201011Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

12 12 Best fit is in the inverted hierarchy case Normal hierarchy (NH):  2 min = 469.94/416dof Inverted hierarchy (IH):  2 min = 468.34/416dof  ∆  2 = 1.6 No significant difference Multi-GeV samples tend to favor inverted hierarchy. There are also some contributions from Multi-GeV  - like samples favoring IH to NH. NH IH Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

13  Under the CPT theorem, P(   ) and P(   ) should be same.  Test oscillation or oscillation separately. 13 SK-I+II+III Preliminary No evidence for CPT violating oscillations is found Anti-neutrino: Neutrino:  m 23 2 =2.2x10 -3 eV 2 sin 2 2  23 =1.0  m 23 2 =2.0x10 -3 eV 2 sin 2 2  23 =1.0 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

14 14 New Electronics (QBEE) Readout (Ethernet) Periodic trigger (60kHz) Clock Event build with variable time windows SK-I,II,III: partial data above threshold (Num. of hits) were read (1.3  sec window x3kHz) SK-IV: All hits above pulse height threshold are read, then apply complex triggers by software. SK-I,II,III: partial data above threshold (Num. of hits) were read (1.3  sec window x3kHz) SK-IV: All hits above pulse height threshold are read, then apply complex triggers by software. Collect all hits every 17  sec. PMT signals Typical event time windows: Super-Low-Energy (SLE) events (<~6.5MeV): -0.5/+1.0  sec Normal events(>~6.5MeV): -5/+35  sec Supernova Relic (SRN) candidates(>~10MeV, No OD): -5/+535  sec T2K events: -512/+512  sec at T2K beam spill timing high rate (~3kHz) decay electrons neutrons Wider dynamic range for charge measurement of each channel (>2000pC) No dead time up to ~6MHz/10sec for Supernova burst neutrinos Apply precise event reconstruction to remove more low-e BG events in real-time Wider dynamic range for charge measurement of each channel (>2000pC) No dead time up to ~6MHz/10sec for Supernova burst neutrinos Apply precise event reconstruction to remove more low-e BG events in real-time Precise analysis in parallel in real-time x5 x100 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 (2010) 428 T2K GPS from J-PARC Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

15 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK15 SK-III (1.3us gate width)SK-IV (40us gate width) Detection Efficiency = 72.6% Detection Efficiency = 88.4% Expected decay curve Identified data Expected decay curve Identified data Parent muon Decay Electron  ~2us Wider gate width of SK-IV enables detection of muon decay electrons at T~1us efficiently

16 16 SK-IV Sub-GeV Multi-GeV Sub-GeV Multi-GeVPC e-like  -like Stable Data taking!  –  oscillation null oscillation SK-IV 449 days data Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

17 Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK17  Recent update on Atmospheric neutrino oscillation from SK-I,II,III  2 Flavor nm-nt oscillation result  Full 3 Flavor including Solar term & CP, Mass Hierarchy  “Consistent with 2 flavor result, No preference of Hierarchy  CPT violations search  “No evidence”  Electronics Upgrade (SK-IV)  Improvement on Decay-electron tagging efficiency  Stable Atmospheric neutrino data taking  Super-Kamiokande Talk/Posters  M. Miura(Nucleon decay) 24-Jul-2010 09:20; BSM Session  H. Sekiya(Solar neutrino) Poster  M. Smy (Low-energy anti neutrino detection) Poster

18

19 19 PRL97,171801 (2006) Tau MC BKG MC Data    multi ring decay-e  like selection; eff  =43%, S/N=5% (Downward going) Likelihood variables Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK (a) Visible Energy (b) Max. decay-e distance from vertex (c) Ring Candidates (d) Sphericity in the lab frame (e) Clustered sphericity in COM frame

20  Best-fit tau excess: 138+/-48(stat.)+15/-32(syst.)  Expected: 78+/-26(syst.) 20 PRL97,171801 (2006) zenith angle distribution of tau enrich sample tau enrich sample is consistent with    oscillation (Likelihood) Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

21  1983 Kamiokande started observation to search for Proton decay  1987Kamiokande observed SN1987a  1991Construction of SK started  1996SK started observation  1998“Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos”  1999K2K started  2001Accident  2002Partial reconstruction SK-II started K2K-II started (-2004)  2006Full reconstruction SK-III started  2008Replacement of DAQ electronics SK-IV Started  2009T2K started “Evidence…”(1998) 21Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

22 Atotsu Entrance Super-Kamiokande XMASS (Mar. 2008~) KamLAND (Tohoku Univ.) IPMU APIMS GC Ge det. Rn det. … (Mar.08~) 40m CANDLES (Mar. 2008~) CLIO (Gravitational Wave) Laser extensometer (Geophysics) Gadolinium project R&D (10mx15mx8~9mh, March 2010~) NEWAGE Superconductive gravimeter 22Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK

Download ppt "Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by."

Similar presentations

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.

Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.

11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.

Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
SN Physics Workshop September 17 th 2009 Michael Smy UC Irvine Super-Kamiokande Results.

SN Physics Workshop September 17 th 2009 Michael Smy UC Irvine Super-Kamiokande Results.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.

Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I (1996-2001) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.

G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.

Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.

Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,

First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.

1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.

21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
S K Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in SK-I An Updated Analysis Alec Habig, Univ. of Minnesota Duluth for the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration With much.

S K Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in SK-I An Updated Analysis Alec Habig, Univ. of Minnesota Duluth for the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration With much.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.

T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.

New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP2005 - Lisbon July 22, 2005.

Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrinos

Atmospheric Neutrinos
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.

Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.

1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
H.Sekiya, Jul 30 th 2008, Philadelphia, ICHEP2008 Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande.

H.Sekiya, Jul 30 th 2008, Philadelphia, ICHEP2008 Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google