1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Federal Subsistence Board January 12-13, 2016 Work Session

2. 1)Program Overview 2)Historical Overview 3)Programmatic Review 4)Revised Process 5)Draft Monitoring Plan Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program

3. The mission of the Monitoring Program is to identify and provide information needed to sustain subsistence fisheries on Federal public lands for rural Alaskans through a multidisciplinary collaborative program. Mission

4. Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program 1)Administered through the Office of Subsistence Management (OSM) 2)Advance projects that are strategically important to the Federal Subsistence Management Program 3)Coordinate and enhance subsistence research and communicate information

5. Regions

6. Historical Overview

7. Allocation of Funds by Region Regional allocation guideline for Fisheries Resource Monitoring Funds. Region Department of Interior Funds Department of Agriculture Funds Northern 17%0% Yukon 29%0% Kuskokwim 29%0% Southwest 15%0% Southcentral 5% 33% Southeast 0%67% Inter- regional 5%0%

8. Program Review 1)Objective review process 2)Increased interaction through a proactive approach 3)Outreach strategy 4)Technical Review Committee (TRC) 5)Transparency 6)Consistency 7)Quality

9. Technical Review Committee 1)Standing interagency committee of senior technical experts from State and Federal agencies 2)OSM Assistant Regional Director determines appointments 3)Current members -BIA, BLM, NPS, FWS, USFS, ADFG and OSM

10. Technical Review Committee 4)Review and rank submitted proposals 5)Interdisciplinary approach – equal composition of biologists and anthropologists

11. Policy and Funding Guidelines  Projects of up to four years duration may be considered in any year’s monitoring plan.  Studies must not duplicate existing projects.  A majority of Monitoring Program funding will be dedicated to non-Federal agencies.  Long term projects will be considered on a case by case basis.

12. Policy and Funding Guidelines  Activities that are not eligible for funding include: a)habitat restoration and enhancement b)hatchery propagation and stocking c)contaminant sampling d)primarily outreach or education

13. How the FRMP Funding Process Works

14. STEP 1- Proposal Development 1) The Office of Subsistence Management assists Regional Advisory Councils with Priority Needs development 2) Principal Investigators work with Regional Advisory Councils and/or communities to develop proposals a) Best to work throughout year, not right before submission due date 3) The Office of Subsistence Management provides technical assistance as needed/requested a) Postcard/letter updates b) Training session at the Winter All Councils meeting

15. STEP 2- Proposal Submission 1)A Complete project package must be submitted on time Follow Notice of Funding Availability/Opportunity 2)A proposal must align with the overall FRMP mission and address all five specific criteria : Strategic Priority / Priority Needs Technical-Scientific Merit Investigator Ability and Resources Partnership-Capacity Cost Benefit

16. STEP 3- Proposal Evaluation 1)Enhance the Monitoring Program 2)Assure program transparency 3)Identify and fund high quality research and monitoring projects that address priority subsistence information questions or needs 4)Maximize funding opportunities

17. STEP 3- Proposal Evaluation (cont.) Key modifications to the proposal review process include: 1)Specific guidelines for assessing how and whether a proposed project has addressed each of the five criteria 2)Receive a single consolidated review from each participating agency 3)Agencies cannot rank their own proposals.

18. STEP 4- Proposal Ranking Responsibility of the Technical Review Committee: 1)Develop a draft Monitoring Plan 2)Evaluate and score each proposal for: Strategic Priority / Priority Needs Technical and Scientific Merit Investigator Ability and Resources Partnership and Capacity Building Cost/Benefit The final score determines the ranking of each proposal.

19. STEP 5- RAC Input and Comments Regional Advisory Councils: 1) Review TRC rankings and proposal summaries 2) Provide comments to accompany proposals to the FSB a) How proposals align with priority needs b) Comments on proposal rankings c) Proposal summaries d) Process

20. STEP 6- FSB Review and Final Monitoring Plan 1)ISC reviews process, TRC rankings and RAC comments and provides comments/recommendations to the FSB 2)FSB reviews process and products a)Endorse a Final Monitoring Plan 3)OSM ARD reviews all comments and finalizes Monitoring Plan

21. Develop an ongoing conversation Integrate people, knowledge and science Transparency Make sure FRMP data is available Outreach strategy

22. 2016 Fisheries Resources Monitoring Program 45 projects received 1 project determined not eligible (habitat restoration) 44 total projects analyzed and ranked 31 SST 13 HM/TEK