1. Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Common Elements that Support Campus-Wide Innovation Copyright Andrea Nixon, A. Michael Berman, Christine Haile, and Dorothy Frayer, 2002. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the authors. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the authors.

2. Panelists Andrea NixonCarleton College A. Michael BermanCalifornia State Polytechnic University-Pomona Christine HaileUniversity at Albany, SUNY Dorothy FrayerDuquesne University

3. Transformative improvements in campus teaching and learning culture Replicable, sustainable, technology- based programs and practices Effective, enterprise-wide, learner- centered instructional systems Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Award

4. Awards to Institutions that Harness Power of IT to…. Improve quality of teaching & learning Advance use of learner-centered instruction Contain or reduce costs Provide greater access to higher education

5. Award Winners 2000University of Washington 2001George Mason University SUNY Learning Network 2002Wake Forest University, School of Medicine

6. Criteria for Award as Checklist for Successful Innovation Clear objectives related to teaching/learning Supporting elements Assessment of impact on teaching/learning Sustainability Replicability

7. What are your Teaching/Learning Objectives? Technology is the enabler, not the goal! Clear objectives drive the choices made in implementation Assessment of success: Degree to which teaching/learning is enhanced

8. Supporting Elements Institutional planning Collaboration among units on campus Training and marketing Organizational adjustments Electronic and personal help resources

9. Supporting Elements Policies (e.g., intellectual property, access) Funding Assessment mechanisms Infrastructure in place Reliability

10. Impact Plan assessment prior to project Assess immediate and long-term effects on quality of teaching and learning Interactive learning Accommodation of different learning styles and needs of non-traditional students Promotion of student initiative & responsibility Institutional costs and reputation

11. Sustainability Address possible barriers to success Faculty incentives and compensation Ownership and copyright policies Institutional motivation and support Curriculum integration How will the project be funded in the future?

12. Replicability Which elements of the project can be replicated or scaled throughout your institution? Which elements of the project may be portable to other institutions?