Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosemary Flynn Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 Two-stage sampling JF Boivin Version 14 November 2007 S:\BOIVIN\695\Winter 2007\Two-stage Sampling.ppt
2
2 1980s-1990s: Progress in use of administrative drug databases
3
3 Advantages Large Population-based Valid prescription data Long-time periods
4
4 Disadvantages Missing data on certain outcomes Temporal sequence not always clear Glucocorticoids cataracts Cataract surgery glucocorticoids Lack of data on confounders
5
5 NSAIDs and breast cancer
6
6 Previous research Poor exposure data Dose Duration Self-reports Small numbers Short follow-up Inadequate control of confounding
7
7 NSAIDs and breast cancer Cases: Saskatchewan cancer registry Controls: Saskatchewan population Drug exposure: 15 yr of computerized information Missing: - Over the counter drugs - Other confounding factors: Menarche Menopause Pregnancies Obesity
8
8 Entire population (= truth) Obese E+ E−E− cancerno cancer Not obese E+ E−E− All E+ E−E− 2 000 40 10 000 100 2 040 10 100 200 400 10 000 600 20 000 OR=0.5 32 740 2 200 440 20 000 10 100 2 640 30 100 OR=2.5
9
9 Obese E+ E−E− cancerno cancer Not obese E+ E−E− All E+ E−E− 2 200 440 20 000 10 100 2 640 30 100 not available computerized databases
10
10 What to do about missing confounder data?
11
11 Option #1 Do not conduct research on that topic
12
12 Option #2 Cohort or case-control study without data on confounder 32 740 Obese women E+ E−E− cancerno cancer Not obese E+ E−E− All women E+ E−E− ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2 200 440 20 000 10 100
13
13 Advantages Cheaper May be scientifically reasonable for certain questions
14
14 Option #3 Collect covariate data on a sample of the study subjects two-stage samples three-stage samples partial questionnaire case series only etc.
15
15 Two-stage sample Sampling approaches: simple random balanced etc.
16
16 Two-stage balanced design Obese E+ E−E− no cancer Not obese E+ E−E− All E+ E−E− cancer 227 23 125 2 23 227 125 248 250/ 32 740 (I) 2 200 440 20 000 10 000
17
17 White JE. A two-stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease. AJE 1982 Cain KC, Breslow NE. Logistic regression analysis and efficient design for two-stage studies. AJE 1988
18
18 Consent for interviews Cases:49% Controls : 39% (Sharpe et al. Saskatchewan study)
19
19 Other related sampling designs three-stage sampling partial questionnaire confounder data on cases only
20
20 Obese E+ E−E− cancerno cancer Not obese E+ E− All E+ E− 2 200 440 20 000 10 100 2 640 30 100 medical record review computerized databases Confounded data on cases only 2 000 40 200 400 ? ? ? ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.