1. Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute www.socopse.se

2. Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project FP6-2005-global-4, Topic II 3.1 2006-2009 Overall objective to provide guidelines and a decision support system tools for the implementation of the WFD with regard to selected priority substances

3. Participating organisations Environmental Institute (EI), Slovakia University of Southampton, School of Civil Engineering & the Environment (SOTON), United Kingdom Kiwa N.V. Netherlands Vyskumny Ustav Vodneho Hospodarstva (WRI), Slovakia Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Finland Instityt Ekologii Terenow Uprzemyslowionych (IETU/Envitech), Poland Norsk institutt for luftforskning (NILU), Norway Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientifi cas (CSIC), Spain Institut National de l´Environment Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), France Nederlands Organisatie Voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO), The Netherlands IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd (IVL), Sweden

4. Pathways of priority substances Industry, application and release patterns Primary Producer A Secondary Producer B Secondary Producer C Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Soil WWTP Conversion Adsorption Bio- accumulation Diffuse releases Production chainEnd useAqueous Environment product wastewater air

6. Project organisation WP 1 Coordination WP 2 Material Flow Analyses WP 3 Management, Technologies WP 4 Decision Support System WP 5 Case Studies Final evaluation and report SAG WP 6 Dissemination and stakeholder interactions

8. Work flow Material flow analysis European scale Substance reports Control technologies Draft Decision Support System Case studies Final Decision Support SystemFinal Report and Synthesis Web site DSS, synthesis

9. WP 2: Material Flow Analyses Leader NILU: Norwegian Institute for Air Research Objective: To describe the main flow paths and releases of Priority Pollutants in European water Major outcomes: - Material flow and emission inventories for selected substances on European scale. - Database tool for source identification and emission calculations at regional scale

10. Hg as Product 302 tonnes Electrical control & switching 25 Other uses 25 Lighting, 21 Waste Disposal Pig&Iron, 8 Residential Comb. 17 Hg as By-product tonnes Chlor alkali, 120 Dental amalgam, 70 Measuring&control 26 Batteries, 15 Other Sources Cement, 25 Non-Ferrous Metals Power Plants, 42 8.1 5.1 21.3 9.0 13.4 21.0 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 4.5 4.0 3.0 Air Water Land Export 6 1 1 6 6 50 100 10 160 1 20.0 7 2.5 6 77.9 14.5 55 50 ? ? SFA Mercury Europe Preliminary results Pacyna - NILU

11. Emissions database

12. WP 3: Inventory and assessment of existing and emerging techniques for emission reduction at the source Leader: INERIS - Institute National de l`Environnement Industriel et des risques Objectives To collect and assess the options for emission reductions of Priority Pollutants by: -Process modifications, substitution of the Priority Pollutants in the various/distinguishable applications -Available and emerging techniques for water treatment and/or product recovery

13. Main steps Surveys Biblio review Workshops WP5 case studies Questionnaires 1 st Draft SRs 2 nd Draft SRs Final SRs ERS WP2 first clues Reduction strategy SRs : Substance Reports ERS : Emission Reduction Strategy Work of WP3 Work of other WP

14. WP 3: Inventory and assessment of existing and emerging techniques for emission reduction at the source Leader: INERIS - Institute National de l`Environnement Industriel et des risques Major outcome: Substance Reports (full detail information of source control options and identified emission control techniques) and Fact Sheets (operational summaries)

15. WP 4: Decision support system (DSS) for source control of priority substances Leader: TNO, the Netherlands Organisations for Applied Scientific Research Objective to develop a DSS including supporting tools for management of PS in order to asses the effectiveness and (secondary) impacts of various measures or combinations of measure and make the right selection of measures

16. WP 4: DSS (2) Leader: TNO, the Netherlands Organisations for Applied Scientific Research The DSS will primarily be developed for authorities to make plans for the control of the PS at both European and national or river basin level The DSS will be formed by a Societal Cost Benefit Analyses, SCBA, supported by knowledge bases and tools for analyses and determination of effect

17. Step by step guidelines (handbook) for implementation of WFD on PPs Web based DSS + information handling (databases and reports)

18. WP 4: DSS (2) Leader: TNO, the Netherlands Organisations for Applied Scientific Research Major outcome: Handbook version of the DSS (print version) + Annexes Web version with additional links to Emissions database, control options database

19. WP 5: Case studies Leader: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Objective: To evaluate the decision support tool by applying it to 4 case studies in different geographical regions and to integrate results and experiences to European scale

20. Case studies Four case studies representing different geographical regions of Europe will be carried out. - West (the MAAS)TNO/KIWA - North (Baltic Sea catchment)SYKE/IETU - Central (Danube catchment)WRI/EI - South (Ter/Llobregat river basins)CSIC

21. Catchment area 1 686 km2 Population of 1 milj. inhabitants Agriculture (24 % cultivated) Industry (dairy, food, metal, paint, detergent) Drinking water source (emergency) to Helsinki Metropolitan area Irrigation source Recreation object Cultural scenery and objects Vantaa River Substances PAH PBDE Nonylphenol DEHP TBT (TPhT) Finland

22. Catchment area 1125,8 km² (Odra river basin) Population of 1 mln. inhabitants (Upper Silesia region) Agriculture (40 % cultivated) Industry (coal mining, energy sector, metallurgy, metal production, mechanical sector, chemical industry) Functions: receptor for anthropogenic water, water retention, recreation and source of water for industry Kłodnica River Substances Mercury PAH Cadmium http://www.ietu.katowice.pl/klodnica/index.htm

23. Length: 905 km; Dh: 384 m From Pouilly-en-Bassigny (Fr) through the Ardennes (Be) to the North Sea (NL) Catchment area: 34.500 km 2 Population: 8.8 million Five Countries: Fr, Lu, Be, D, NL Source of water for drinking water production, agriculture, industry Meuse characteristics PBDE, Hg, Cd, PAH, Pesticides

24. Ter and Llobregat Rivers supplies 55 and 45 % of drinking water to Barcelona and surroundings. Spain Substances PBDE Nonylphenol Pesticides

25. Upcoming events and reports Reports on material flow analysis and emissions (late 2007) Workshops on emission control measures

26. Upcoming activities – WP3 workshops on emission control 1.HCB, isoproturon, atrazine, 25 October 2007, Paris, FR 2.PAH, Cd, Hg, 29 November 2007, Katowice, PL 3.Nonylphenol, TBT, DEPH, PBDE, 14 February 2008, Nieuwegein, NL Aim of workshops: to present/discuss/update preliminary compilations of emission control methods and associated costs with industry, scientists, stakeholders......

27. Contacts www.socopse.se John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Gothenburg, Sweden john.munthe@ivl.se