Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAusten Booth Modified over 9 years ago
1
ICEC26-ICMC2016 New Delhi, India
2
Rossi Mendez Sales Engineer – HHS Author: Stefan Schaap Project Engineer – HHS
4
March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 3
5
Demaco Design Scope TL-SE TL-SW TL-FB5 TL-NW ICEC-ICMC 2016 4 Distribution Box DB3 SIS100 Distribution Box DB4 Demaco Design Scope March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 4 TL-SW TL-NW TL-FB5 TL-SE
6
SIS100 TL TL-Design Option 1 TL-Design Option 2 1. Functional Specifications 2. Design Code 3. Transfer Pipe Dimensions 4. Pipe Configuration 5. TL in ARC-Part SIS100 6. Spool Layout 7. Thermal Expansion 8. Safety Assessment 9. Heat Load 10. Sensors 11. Vacuum 12. Testing 13. Time & Resources 14. Project cost March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 5
7
BENDED LINE STRAIGHT LINE March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 6 Main considerations: Space constraints Process constraints Flow constraints (such as pressure drop) Constructability Operability Manufacturing cost Case Scenario 1 Case Scenario 2
8
Pros Evenly distributed forces Follow the shape of the building, optimum use of available space. Cons More expensive Complex manufacturing sequence Pros Easy manufacturing Follow the shape of the building Cons Lateral bellow forces It requires more space March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 7 Case Scenario 1 Bended Pipe Case Scenario 2 Straight Pipe Case Scenario 2 Straight Pipe
9
Transfer Line North West (TL- NW) Transfer Line South West (TL-SW) Transfer Line South East (TL-SE) Transfer Line FB5 (TL-FB5) March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 8 Design Code Acquire Data Select relief device Fail Scenarios Locate Relief devices Define Protected System 50K/80K System – 0.2W/cm² Demaco common practice 4K System - 0.6 W/cm² (W. Lehmann and G. Zahn)
10
March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 9
11
Case Scenario 2 Case Scenario 1 March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 Pressure Safety Valve (PSV) ∆P ≤ 3%x P set Design Code EN13648-3 AD2000-A2 Case Scenario 1 Vacuum Barrier & Safety Valve Case Scenario 2 Safety Valves March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 \ Case Scenario 2 10 Case Scenario 1 Valid for all CPP
12
Demaco recommends to use a straight line, even though a bended line may be convenient (stress distribution). This type of transfer line is common for manufacturers of transfer line. Straight transfer lines are more economical (30% less) than bended transfer lines. Safety assessment- measures are necessary to protect the line from excessive pressure during Loss of Insulating Vacuum (LIV). Safety valve locations in the 4K supply line and 4K suction line are critical (Safety Assessment – TL-NW) due to pressure loss in the TL. Vacuum barriers / safety valves are viable options for protecting transfer lines against LIV. Demaco recommends use of vacuum barriers with a reduced number of safety valves. March 16 ICEC-ICMC 2016 11
13
XFEL-DESY / Germany Multiple Helium transfer lines LHe
14
DESY / Germany Multiple Helium transfer lines and Valve Boxes LHe
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.