1. Collaboration and Co-Teaching School Improvement Technical Assistance Train-the-Trainer Sessions Summer 2015 Division of Special Education and Student Services

2. What are the barriers to collaboration in your content area _________?

3. Breaking Barriers to Collaboration Improved Opportunities for Communication and Collaboration Systematic, Ongoing Professional Development Changes in School Procedures Changes in Division Policy

4. Regulations: Access to Instruction “Least restrictive environment” (LRE) means that to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are not disabled, and that special classes, separate schooling or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. (34 CFR 300.114 through 34 CFR 300.120)

5. Regulations General education qualified personnel who are knowledgeable about the students and their special education, may implement special education services in collaboration with special education personnel. (8 VAC 20-81-40. 2.c Special Education Staffing Requirements)

6. Regulations “Collaboration” means interaction among professionals as they work toward a common goal. Teachers do not necessarily have to engage in co-teaching in order to collaborate. (8VAC 20-81-10 Definitions)

7. Regulations “Co-teaching” means a service delivery option with two or more professionals sharing responsibility for a group of students for some or all of the school day in order to combine their expertise to meet student needs. (8VAC 20-81-10 Definitions)

8. What is Co-Teaching? “Co-Teaching” is one approach for helping students with disabilities access a rigorous general education curriculum in the least restrictive environment while receiving support from two certified teachers. (Conderman & Hedin, 2012; Friend & Cook, 2010; Murawski, 2008)

9. Co-Teaching Approaches 1. One Teach, One Observe. One of the advantages in co- teaching is that more detailed observation of students engaged in the learning process can occur. With this approach, for example, co-teachers can decide in advance what types of specific observational information to gather during instruction and can agree on a system for gathering the data. Afterward, the teachers should analyze the information together. Recommended Use: Frequent, for brief time periods

10. Co-Teaching Approaches 2. Station Teaching. In this co-teaching approach, teachers divide content and students. Each teacher then teaches the content to one group and subsequently repeats the instruction for the other group. If appropriate, a third station could give students an opportunity to work independently. Recommended Use: Frequent

11. Co-Teaching Approaches 3. Parallel Teaching. On occasion, student learning would be greatly facilitated if they just had more supervision by the teacher or more opportunity to respond. In parallel teaching, the teachers are both covering the same information, but they divide the class into two groups and teach simultaneously. Recommended Use: Frequent

12. Co-Teaching Approaches 4. Alternative Teaching: In most class groups, occasions arise in which several students need specialized attention. In alternative teaching, one teacher takes responsibility for the large group while the other works with a smaller group Recommended Use: Occasional

13. Co-Teaching Approaches 5. Team Teaching: In team teaching, both teachers are delivering the same instruction at the same time. Some teachers refer to this as having one brain in two bodies. Others call it tag team teaching. Most co-teachers consider this approach the most complex but satisfying way to co-teach, but the approach that is most dependent on teachers' styles Recommended Use: Occasional

14. Co-Teaching Approaches 6. One Teach, One Assist. In a second approach to co-teaching, one person would keep primary responsibility for teaching while the other professional circulated through the room providing unobtrusive assistance to students as needed. Recommended Use: Seldom

15. Roles and Responsibilities

16. Considerations for Division-Wide Facilitation of Co-Teaching Co-teaching is most successful: Implemented with fidelity Integrated into school & division long-term plans with accountability strategies Supported through professional development (Adapted from: Texas Co-Teaching Guidelines)

17. School/Classroom Self-Assessment of Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Administrative Support Interaction of Co-Teachers Evaluation of Co-Teaching Effectiveness Activity

18. Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Administrative Support 1.A mission and vision have been established and communicated regarding co-teaching. 2.A thoughtful process is in place for assigning co-teachers. 3.Administrators have defined and shared their expectations with co-teachers, including their roles and responsibilities. 4.Professional development in co-teaching has been provided to co-teachers jointly, and they have been given books, videos, etc.

19. Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Administrative Support 5. Common planning time is provided in the master schedule. 6. The master schedule is completed, with teacher assignments, in a timely manner to ensure time for co-teachers to begin collaboration and co-planning. 7. Students with disabilities are scheduled by IEP into heterogeneous classes. 8. Resources (personnel, materials, time) are committed to implementing and sustaining the co- teaching model. 9. A system is in place for co-teachers to access support.

20. Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Interaction of Co-Teachers 1.Co-teachers utilize planning time to work collaboratively. 2.Co-teachers collaboratively engage in long-range (course/semester) and short-term co-planning (unit/lesson). 3.Co-teachers demonstrate collaborative practices: parity of roles, shared responsibility for academic and nonacademic demands, shared responsibility for establishing and maintaining classroom management, shared accountability for student outcomes. 4.Co-taught classrooms have an obvious feeling of collaboration and community.

21. Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Interaction of Co-Teachers 5. Co-teachers demonstrate evidence-based practices for instruction and behavior management, and use a variety of co-teaching models. 6. There is evidence that accommodations and modifications are implemented in the co-taught classroom. 7. There is ongoing measurement of student performance, using formative and summative data to inform instruction.

22. Quality Indicators of Co-Teaching Evaluation of Co-Teaching Effectiveness 1.Administrators observe co-taught classes and planning sessions and provide feedback. 2.Evaluators (administrators, supervisors, etc.) have received specialized training for evaluating co- teaching partners. 3.Administrators and teachers analyze co-teaching’s effect on attendance, discipline and referral statistics, achievement, SOL performance, and other measures of success.

23. School Team Self-Assessment Inclusive & Collaborative School Based Practices: The Big Picture & Details Activity

24. ? Questions ?

25. Resources State Supported Demonstration Sites & PD/TA Centers

26. Co-Teaching Demonstration Sites Demonstration sites showcase general and special education teachers sharing responsibility for the achievement of all students in the general education classroom through co-teaching, collaboration. 2015-16 sites will be announced soon. http://doe.virginia.gov/support/school_improveme nt/training/index.shtml

27. Co-Teaching Demonstration Sites Visit Information Contact your regional Training and Technical Assistance Center (TTAC) to determine which sites are open and to schedule a visit.Training and Technical Assistance Center (TTAC) The number of site visits will be limited so as not to interfere with the ongoing instructional program.

28. Professional Development Centers Training & Technical Assistance Center System based at 7 universities (TTAC): VCU - regions 1 & 8 ODU and W&M - regions 2 & 3 GMU - region 4 JMU - region 5 VA Tech and RU - regions 6 & 7 TtacOnline http://www.ttaconline.org/http://www.ttaconline.org/ 28

29. More Centers Autism Center for Excellence based at VCU http://www.vcuautismcenter.org/ http://www.vcuautismcenter.org/ Center for Deaf/Hard of Hearing based at the Partnership for People with Disabilities (PPD) at VCU http://www.vcu.edu/partnership/prep.html Virginia School for the Deaf & Blind Outreach Services http://www.vsdb.k12.va.us/Outreach/http://www.vsdb.k12.va.us/Outreach/ Deaf-Blind Project Center based at the PPD at VCU http://www.vcu.edu/partnership/vadbproject 29

30. More Centers Accessible Instructional Materials Center of Virginia at GMU (AIM-VA) http://kihd.gmu.edu/aim/http://kihd.gmu.edu/aim/ Center for Transition Innovation based at the Rehabilitation Research & Training Center at VCU http://www.worksupport.com/http://www.worksupport.com/ Virginia Tiered System of Supports Research & Implementation Center “RIC” at VCU’s Center for School & Community Collaboration – Coming Soon

31. More Centers Center for Family Involvement based at the PPD at VCU http://www.partnership.vcu.edu/ http://www.partnership.vcu.edu/ Parent Education Advocacy Training Center http://www.peatc.org/ http://www.peatc.org/ 31

32. VDOE Contacts Dr. Samantha Hollins, Special Education Program Improvement Samantha.Hollins@doe.virginia.gov 804-786-2900 Dr. Teresa Lee, Special Education Instructional Services Teresa.Lee@doe.virginia.gov 804-371-8283 Dr. Pat Abrams, Special Education Instructional Services Pat.Abrams@doe.virginia.gov 804-225-2707