1. Mott Electron Polarization Results Riad Suleiman July 10, 2013

2. Mott Scattering Electron motion in nucleus electric field results in magnetic field in electron rest frame,, if is nucleus-electron separation, then and Interaction of this magnetic field with electron (spin) magnetic moment introduces a term in the scattering potential, Presence of spin-orbit term in scattering potential introduces spin dependence in scattering cross section which could be detected as a left/right count rate asymmetry

3. Note: Parity-conserving: Measure spin-momentum correlation of the type: Transverse (or Normal) Beam Asymmetry measured recently using the setup of parity- violating experiments at high energies (due to two-photon exchange) probes the same spin-momentum correlation as Mott Asymmetry at low energies (due to spin-orbit interaction of electron moving in a Coulomb field). Parity-violating: Measure spin-momentum correlation of the type: V V r r L L L L V V r r L L L L

4. Mott Cross Section and Sherman Function Mott cross section: where, is the un-polarized cross section, and is the analyzing power (Single-Atom Sherman Function), Sherman Function is largest for high-Z (Gold, Z=79) targets and low-energy electrons Spin-flip Amplitude Non-spin-flip Amplitude

5. Theoretical Corrections Radiative corrections Screening by atomic electrons Finite nuclear size

6. Energy Sensitivity For T=5.0 MeV, p=5.5 MeV/c. However, momentum was measured to be p=5.336 ± 0.023 MeV/c, or T=4.850 MeV For δT/T=3%, δS/S(T=4.850)=0.09%

7. Sherman Function and Target Thickness Single-Atom Sherman Function must be corrected for plural scattering (a few large angle scattering) in the target: S SA (d=0, T=5.0 MeV) = -0.5215, S eff (d=1.0 μm, T=5.0) = -0.4006 Systematic Error (∆S/S) = 2.8% Effective Sherman FunctionError (∆S/S) Theoretical corrections2.0% Target thickness extrapolation2.0% Scattering angle (0.1°)0.1% Electron energy (1.0%)0.03%

8. Measuring Mott Asymmetry How to measure the Mott Asymmetry A LR ? –For one helicity state, measure the number of left and right detector events, and –Flip the electron polarization, measure the number of events again, and –Calculate the cross-ratio (r), –Then, the Mott Asymmetry: Same for A UD False Asymmetries: –Cancel to all orders: beam current, target thickness, solid angle, detector efficiency and dead time (due to slow DAQ common to all detectors) –Cancel to first order: differences in beam polarization between the two helicity states and misalignment errors resulting in detectors at different scattering angle

9. 5 MeV Mott Beamline

10. Detector Assembly I. Scattering Angle = 172.6° II. Solid Angle = 0.18 msr

11. ΔE and E Detectors -H7415 (R6427) 1" PMT -1 mm x 1" x 1" EJ-212 Plastic Scintillator -0.125" x 1" x 2" Acrylic Light Guide -H6559 (R6091) 3" PMT -3" diameter x 2.5" long EJ-200 Plastic Scintillator painted with EJ-510

12. Old 5 MeV Mott DAQ LeCroy CAMAC 4300B Fast Encoding and Readout ADC (FERA), 10 Bit ORTEC CAMAC HM 413 HISTO-MEMORY

13. Detectors Spectra -Beam Current = 1.0 μA -Gold Target 1.0 μm -Trigger Rate 1 kHz -5 minutes of data

14. E Detectors Spectra

15. FADC Chan Signal 0E LEFT 1E RIGHT 2E UP 3E DOWN 4ΔE LEFT 5ΔE RIGHT 6ΔE UP 7ΔE DOWN 8BFM 9 10Mott Trigger 11 12Delayed Helicity 13T_Settle 14Pattern-Sync 15Pair-Sync Mott Trigger Left E Left ∆E New 5 MeV Mott DAQ Signals on Scope Signals in FADC Data

16. Calculate pedestal and Energy: Few FADC Events in LEFT Detector

18. Maximize Longitudinal Polarization on June 04, 2012  By adjusting INJTWF, P x and P y were minimized and beam polarization was measured:  After minimization, new nominal Injector Two-Wien-Flipper (INJTWF) settings during PEPPo data taking are: RunIHWPP x (%) ± StatP y (%) ± Stat 04Jun12 16:50:12OUT0.82 ± 0.92-1.22 ± 0.90 04Jun12 16:57:48IN0.45 ± 1.051.80 ± 1.02 04Jun12 17:03:38OUT0.42 ± 0.85-2.75 ± 0.85 04Jun12 17:11:00IN-0.15 ± 0.802.55 ± 0.80 Vertical Wien Angle+90.00˚ Solenoids Angle-91.45˚ Horizontal Wien Angle+86.70˚

19. Measure Longitudinal Polarization on June 10, 2012  Beam polarization was changed to horizontal transverse (P x ) with Horizontal Wien Angle changed from +86.70˚ to 0.00˚ RunIHWPP x (%) ± StatP y (%) ± Stat 6324OUT-82.96 ± 1.281.53 ± 1.28 6326IN84.03 ± 1.27-1.53 ± 1.27 6327IN85.20 ± 1.27-2.19 ± 1.28 6328OUT-84.76 ± 1.27-0.07 ± 1.28 6329IN83.45 ± 1.281.71 ± 1.28 6330OUT-84.09 ± 1.27-1.95 ± 1.28 6331IN84.16 ± 1.28-0.61 ± 1.28 6332OUT-84.54 ± 1.28-1.72 ± 1.28 6333IN82.06 ± 1.28-0.02 ± 1.28

21. Polarization Precession in 5 MeV Dipole P y is the same in Mott and Compton Polarimeters P x and P z polarization precession is: where a is electron anomalous magnetic moment, o Mott θ bend = -12.5˚ o Compton θ bend = +25.0˚ Mott, T = 5.0 MeV, θ spin = -0.16˚ Compton, p = 8.25 MeV/c, θ spin = +0.47˚ Total polarization precession, θ p = 0.63˚

22. Polarization at Compton Polarimeter At Mott: measurements on June 4 and June 10:  P x = -0.6% ± 0.6% (stat)  P y = 1.2% ± 0.4% (stat)  P z = 83.7% ± 0.6% (stat) At Compton: o cos(0.63˚) = 1.000 o sin(0.63˚) = 0.011  P x = 0.3% ± 0.6% (stat)  P y = 1.2% ± 0.4% (stat)  P z = 83.7% ± 0.6% (stat)

23. Summary  The electron beam polarization during PEPPo experiment is: P x = 0.3% ± 0.6% (stat) ± 2.8% (sys) P y = 1.2% ± 0.4% (stat) ± 2.8% (sys) P z = 83.7% ± 0.6% (stat) ± 2.8% (sys)  More work this Fall to reduce the systematic error I.New theoretical calculations II.New target thickness extrapolation