Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Adaptive Case Management from the Activity Modality Perspective Lars Taxén Linköping University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Adaptive Case Management from the Activity Modality Perspective Lars Taxén Linköping University"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Adaptive Case Management from the Activity Modality Perspective Lars Taxén Linköping University lars.taxen@telia.com www.neana.se

2 22 Outline Point of departure The Activity Modalities and the Activity Domain A BPMN analysis Some alternative models Discussion –Reconceptualization of “business process” –Modeling in the “large” and in the “small” –Ontology of models –Implications for BPM and ACM

3 3 Point of departure …

4 4 BPM and ACM BPM and ACM need to acknowledge our human, innate predispositions for acting in the world Otherwise, we may contrive means – approaches, methods, notations, tools – that aggravates BPM and ACM rather than alleviates them

5 5 Integrationism – a new theory of communication Knowledge is not a matter of gaining access to something outside yourself; all knowledge is internally generated by the human capacity for sign-making; the external world supplies input to this creative process but does not predetermine the outcome; signs and, hence knowledge, arise from creative attempts to integrate the various activities of which human beings are capable. (Roy Harris, 2009, p. 162)

6 6 … activity …

7 7 Enacting means Aligning individual meanings - objectivation - contextualization - stabilization - spatialization - temporalization - transition - motivation Activity Modalities About something - a target Frame a context of relevance Work out relevant actions Orient ourselves in space Conceive of actions Change focus Motivated by some need The Activity Domain

8 8 The map: orientation in space - spatialization The route: actions - temporalization The scale in km: convention - stabilization Target: the travel - objectivation A context for planning the action before carrying it out An example - Travelling to the ACM workshop Motivation Present and get feed-back on my ideas

9 9 What’s in the head is reflected outside the head vision hearing taste smell touch Action External elementsInternal elements motivation objectivation contextualization spatialization temporalization stabilization transition motivational target contextual spatial temporal stabilizing transitional Neuronal workspace Evaluative circuits Long-term memory circuits Motor circuits Attentional circuits Perceptual circuits Activity domain

10 10 A BPMN analysis

11 11 Developed by an industry consortium Took six years and more than 140 meetings Specification defines 53 constructs Majority of users use about 10 Recker (2010)

12 12 Recker et al. (2010) BPMN example ‘payment process’

13 13 Recker et al. (2010) Activity domains – motive and target

14 14 Recker et al. (2010) Transitions between activity domains

15 15 Recker et al. (2010) Temporalization - work flow, actions

16 16 Recker et al. (2010) Spatialization – relevant things

17 17 Summary Activity –Activity domains: Pools and Lanes –Transition: between Pools (Message Flow) –Temporalization: Activities, events/states, control flow logic –Spatialization: Data objects, artifacts (no relationships) –Stabilization: Business rules not included in BPMN –Objectivation: Target implicit (“The payment process”) –Interdependencies between modalities: Not salient Main focus of BPMN is on the temporalization modality –Other modalities are less attended Provides a one-dimensional conceptualization of activity –Not aligned with human, innate faculties for acting

18 18 “A great deal of research and development progresses without considering one important question, that of how BPMN is actually being used in practice.” Recker (2010, p. 194)

19 19 Some models aligned with the Activity Modalities

20 20 ?

21 21 Target model - objectivation

22 22 Target model - objectivation

23 23 Integration within and across activity domains

24 24 Information model - spatialization TEST_ITEM DESIGN_ITEM Impacts (man-hours) REQUIREMENT Tested_by Included_In Directed_To (fulfillment-status) Baseline PROGRESS_CONTROL_ITEM MILESTONE CR CHANGE_PROPOSAL_ITEM TR INTEGRATION_ITEM LSV AD-package PROD_DOC PRODUCT Work Package Feature Increment Requirement Issuer has Depends_on ! ANATOMY_ITEM

25 25 Process model - temporalization In Service Support Performance Need or Incident New standards & technologies Product Solution need Changes & expectations.- Gaps Solution Sales object Define Business Opportunity Define Product Content Prepare Deployment Exhibit Product in Service Specify Product Design Market Offer Design & Verify Product Create Business SalesImplement Solution Supply Solution SC8 PC6 SC7 SC5SC1SC2 SC3,4 SC6SC6.5 PC0PC1PC2 PC3,4,5 Delivery to Order states PC0: Offer requested PC1: Order / Contract PC2: Product arrived PC3: Ready for Acceptance PC4: Customer Acceptance PC5: Product in service PC6: Solution fulfillment New Product Development states SC1: Market offer intent SC2: Product release intent SC3: Product model approval SC4: Design Implementation Decision SC5: Market offer SC6: Product quality approved SC6.5: Product ready for deployment SC7: Market release decision SC8: Full deployment acknowledged

26 26 Enterprise systems supporting integration

27 27 Discussion

28 28 Reconceptualization of “business process” Business process definition? –“Process is a series of actions bringing about a result” –Human-centric BPM, Data- and Artifact-centric BPM, knowledge-driven BPM, “the process contains data…” Business process a proxy for several modalities –Not only temporalization –“Compresses” the multi-dimensional character of the Activity Modalities into a single dimension Replace “business process” with “activity domain” –“Decompresses” activity into full modality dimensions –“Process” retained for the temporalization modality

29 29 Modeling in the “large” and the “small” BPM – “large”, business, community perspective ACM - “small”, individual perspective, agile and adaptive Same basis in the Activity Modalities –Regardless of acting in solitude or in collaboration, actors need to master all the modalities Knowledge located in the individual; constructed in the social –Vygotsky –Notions like “shared” understanding, “distributed cognition”, “organizational knowledge” and the like, are rejected

30 30 Integrationist versus representative view on models In which “world” is the model located? Models are signs in the integration of activity (Roy Harris) “Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) [is a] representation model, which specifies a set of rigorously defined ontological constructs to describe all types of real-world phenomena” Recker (2010) “real-world” represents Model

31 31 BPM (workflow)ACM (data) Implications for BPM and ACM Balance “Routines are a double-edged sword. They are helpful when they provide options, but detrimental when they hinder detection of changes in the task or environment.” Butler and Gray (2006) “route”“map”both!

32 32 Conclusion Work in progress, attempting to ground BPM and ACM inquiries in human predispositions for integrating activities Necessary to advance the current state of play Or?


Download ppt "1 Adaptive Case Management from the Activity Modality Perspective Lars Taxén Linköping University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google