Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarry Lang Modified over 8 years ago
1
Famine Early Warning Systems Network February 2, 2016 FOOD SECURITY IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2015-16 EL NIÑO
2
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK1 Key Messages A strong El Niño has resulted in severe drought in Central America, the Caribbean, Ethiopia, and southern Africa. This event comes on top of other ongoing large-scale emergencies (Yemen, South Sudan, Nigeria, and Syria). In countries covered by FEWS NET ~38 million people will require emergency food assistance during FY16. This reflects a 30% increase compared to FEWS NET’s estimates for FY15. More than half of the countries FEWS NET covers, and roughly 30% of the population in need during FY16 have been directly affected by El Niño-related climate impacts. The major impacts of the drought in Southern Africa will not be felt until FY17. Though the 2015/16 droughts are some of the worst on record, famine-level mortality is very unlikely given improved safety nets, lack of conflict in the affected areas, and improved information and early warning analysis. There is at least a 50% chance of a transition to La Niña in 2016, increasing the likelihood of drought in the Horn of Africa during late 2016. FEWS NET focuses on food security impacts; water/health, broader socio-economic impacts and developmental losses also must be considered.
3
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK2 El Niño impacts on rainfall October 2015 – March 2016 (Forecast) June – September 2015 (Observed)
4
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK3 Estimated FY16 emergency food assistance needs FY16: ~38 million people in Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse in FEWS NET countries Assistance needs are +30% vs. FY15 Half of FEWS NET countries and ~30% of food insecure households are directly impacted by El Nino ■ ■ ■ ■ Large-scale food security crises not related to El Nino
5
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK4 ETHIOPIA
6
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK5 FEWS NET analytical process Regular visits by FEWS NET staff to areas of concern HEA outcome analysis covering ~100 livelihood zones in Amhara, Tigray, Oromia, and SNNPR 8 month outlook to be released in February Representative household surveys in three zones planned for March/April
7
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK6 ETHIOPIA Mar-Sep 2015 rainfall as a % of normal Source: FEWS NET/USGS CHIRPS
8
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK7 ETHIOPIA: Estimated food security outcomes, Jan-Mar 2016 Source: FEWS NET
9
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK8 Surface water availability per capita as a % of the 1981-2014 average Main season maize crop production compared to the baseline year Source: FEWS NET/USGS WRSISource: FEWS NET/NASA
10
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK9 Other key assumptions Sharp declines in the availability of labor opportunities. Limited coping capacity compared to the baseline year. Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) o Delivery of 6 months of transfer to ~8 million beneficiaries o Utilization of a 16% contingency to expand PSNP caseload Generally stable livestock prices, wages in agropastoral areas. Normal Belg and Kiremt rainfall in 2016. Some risk of continued dryness in northern pastoral areas.
11
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK10 % of households facing a deficit according to HEA outcome analysis Source: FEWS NET
12
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK11 Issues related to response Ethiopia appeal: 46% funded, 34% for food sector (OCHA, 1/30) pipeline break anticipated in April. Port functioning: Djibouti problematic; WFP already moving food through Berbera, planning to use Port Sudan Non-food needs: Water availability expected to be very problematic, large MAM/SAM caseload likely.
13
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK12 SOUTHERN AFRICA
14
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK13 2015 maize production levels were poor Botswana Lesotho Malawi Mozambique Namibia South Africa Swaziland Zambia Zimbabwe Regional 2015 maize production levels compared to the five-year average Source: FEWS NET calculations with data from SADC and government ministries
15
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK14 Current regional maize grain stocks are below average Private Gov’t and institutional Household Madagascar / Malawi Mozambique South Africa ** / * Zambia Zimbabwe * Imports from international markets have helped to fill gaps. Source: FEWS NET and SAGIS Maize price compared to the 5-year average Grain stocks compared to average Source: FEWS NET and SAGIS
16
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK15 Source: FEWS NET/NOAA ARC2 Areas affected by drought in Southern Africa, November 1, 2015 - January 31, 2016
17
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK16 Below-average rains forecasted for coming months NMME Precipitation Standard Anomalies: Feb – Apr 2016 Source: NOAA Probability of rainfall <lower tercile Feb – Apr 2016 Source: ECMWF Probability Forecast for Precipitation, Feb-Apr 2016 Source: IRI
18
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK17 South Africa (late Jan): Fallow field in surplus producing area Zambia (Jan 13th): Wilted maize, Sesheke Zimbabwe (Jan): Stunted maize crop Mozambique (Jan): Cattle in Maputo province
19
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK18 High risk of price shocks during 16/17 consumption year Regional maize deficit expected for a 2 nd consecutive year o Supplies for 2016/17 year expected to be significantly below average o International imports unlikely to fully offset gap o Currency issues and port capacity may constrain imports Intraregional trade o SA will continue to export to traditionally grain deficit countries though export levels will likely be below average. o Zambia’s role as regional supplier expected to be significantly lower last year. Katanga Province in DRC, among other areas, is likely to be affected o Concerns about MW and ZW capacity to import Areas where price shock risk is highest o Malawi, southern and central Mozambique, southern Zimbabwe, Katanga Province (DRC)
20
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK19 Food insecure population projections Regional food security crisis likely to be worst since 2002/03. Currently 2.5 million people are in Crisis (IPC Phase 3) in Southern Africa (Malawi, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Lesotho). Conservatively, the size of the IPC 3+ population could double compared to previous levels, peaking between December 2016 and February 2017. SOUTHERN AFRICA: Estimated food security outcomes, Jan-Mar 2016 Source: FEWS NET
21
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK20 Other areas affected by El Nino EAST AFRICA: Mar-Sep 2015 rainfall as a % of normal Source: FEWS NET/USGS CENTRAL AMERICA/HAITI: Jan – Sep 2015 drought rank Source: FEWS NET/USGS
22
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK21 Global staple food availability likely to remain near average Source: FEWS NET
23
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK22 A transition to a La Nina is possible in 2016 Typical La Niña impacts on rainfall Source: FEWS NET/NOAA/USGS
24
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK23 Key Messages A strong El Niño has resulted in severe drought in Central America, the Caribbean, Ethiopia, and southern Africa. This event comes on top of other ongoing large-scale emergencies (Yemen, South Sudan, Nigeria, and Syria). In countries covered by FEWS NET ~38 million people will require emergency food assistance during FY16. This reflects a 30% increase compared to FEWS NET’s estimates for FY15. More than half of the countries FEWS NET covers, and roughly 30% of the population in need during FY16 have been directly affected by El Niño-related climate impacts. The major impacts of the drought in Southern Africa will not be felt until FY17. Though the 2015/16 droughts are some of the worst on record, famine-level mortality is very unlikely given improved safety nets, lack of conflict in the affected areas, and improved information and early warning analysis. There is at least a 50% chance of a transition to La Niña in 2016, increasing the likelihood of drought in the Horn of Africa during late 2016. FEWS NET focuses on food security impacts; water/health, broader socio-economic impacts and developmental losses also must be considered.
25
__________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK24 Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) PHASE 1 Minimal Households are meeting their basic food and nonfood needs without unsustainable coping strategies. PHASE 2 Stressed Household food consumption is minimally adequate. Households are unable to afford some essential nonfood expenditures without unsustainable coping strategies. PHASE 3 Crisis Households face food consumption gaps or are only meeting minimal food needs through unsustainable coping strategies. URGENT ACTION REQUIRED PHASE 4 Emergency Households face extreme food consumption gaps or are experiencing extreme loss of livelihood assets that will likely lead to food consumption gaps. PHASE 5 Famine Households have a near complete lack of food and/or other basic needs. Starvation, death, and destitution are evident. ! Phase classification would likely be worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.