Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

June 1, 2015 Smart Modernization Natural Gas Infrastructure Expansion.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "June 1, 2015 Smart Modernization Natural Gas Infrastructure Expansion."— Presentation transcript:

1 June 1, 2015 Smart Modernization Natural Gas Infrastructure Expansion

2 Pipeline Safety & Infrastructure Replacement

3 Commitment to Safety Safest Energy Delivery System in America The natural gas industry has a long-standing record of providing natural gas service safely and effectively to more than 177 million Americans and is dedicated to the continued enhancement of pipeline safety.

4 2013 NARUC Resolution RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners… encourages regulators and industry to consider sensible programs aimed at replacing the most vulnerable pipelines as quickly as possible along with the adoption of rate recovery mechanisms that reflect the financial realities of the particular utility in question; and be it further; RESOLVED, That State commissions should explore, examine, and consider adopting alternative rate recovery mechanisms as necessary to accelerate the modernization, replacement and expansion of the nation’s natural gas pipeline systems

5 The overall trend is positive Nine states moved to adopt programs in 2013, alone NJ, MA, PA & DC adopted pipeline safety measures in 2014 West Virginia recently passed legislation States address this issue differently The basis for these decisions is always just and reasonable rates for consumers Accelerated Infrastructure Replacement Programs

6 Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Expansion

7 “Smart Modernization” Infrastructure replacement programs, if designed and coupled properly, provide the opportunity to put new technology in the ground which could allow for greater pipeline capacity and pressure in a given area. With greater capacity, utilities are better positioned to expand to serve more customers.

8 Drivers for Natural Gas Demand & Infrastructure Expansion Low price of natural gas Reductions in consumer energy prices Economic development opportunities Environmental quality (GHG reduction, efficiency) Energy security New technologies (NGVs, CHP, etc.) The low price of natural gas has attracted investment by utilities. Where natural gas is available, a builder will put it in 84 percent of the time. Natural gas will have 80 - 90 percent of the market where lines reach, but there is a significant amount of construction and/or area beyond reach of utility lines.

9 The Traditional Expansion Model Under traditional models, utilities utilize tests to determine whether or not an expansion project is economical. Should the project not satisfy the utility’s preferred test(s), the company would have to decide whether to invest in a new line at a projected loss or invest under the condition that new customers compensate them for any revenue shortfall. This compensatory fee is known as Contribution in Aid of Construction (CIAC). CIAC fees can result in new customers having to shoulder a large, up-front payment to the utility. Utilities have traditionally built new lines only after a sufficient number of customers in a project area have committed to take gas service.

10 Impediments to Expansion Economic viability Main line costs vary depending on topological and environmental factors The average cost is approximately $1 million per mile A utility must determine whether increased throughput from expansion will be sufficient to cover the costs of expanding a line Under traditional rate constructs, it is often not economical Other issues Permit streamlining Land access Workforce coordination Historical tests & policies may impose redundant and uneconomic obstacles to system expansion.

11 Role of State & Local Governments Re-evaluate economic tests used for assessing line expansion investments Authorize PUCs to allow system expansion costs to be recovered through general tariffs Provide subsidies for expansion of gas networks to unserved areas that meet established density criteria (via economic development grants or state-backed bonds) Promote fuel conversion through information dissemination Adopt policies that move beyond a site-based approach to energy efficiency and move toward the use of the full fuel cycle Consider including natural gas expansion in comprehensive state energy planning As concerns over natural gas supply and price subside, there is a strong justification for PUC policies that would support system expansion. PUCs and other state policymakers might consider the following:

12 Working Together With Utilities Secure commitments from large anchor customers Mitigate initial customer charges Amortize consumer conversion costs Educate potential customers Gather bundled customer commitments

13 States with Infrastructure Expansion Programs 35 states presently have or are considering an innovative infrastructure expansion program or policy

14 Cost Recovery Through Tracker, Rider or Surcharge Economic Development Program Comprehensive Energy Planning State Loans or Bonds Alaska Maine North Carolina Connecticut New York Virginia Mississippi Tennessee Vermont Georgia (STRIDE) Pennsylvania (GET Gas) Minnesota (New Area Surcharge) Virginia and West Virginia recently passed legislation Michigan and New York are presently considering legislation

15 The Declining Trend of Natural Gas Emissions

16 Cleaner Air and Reduced Emissions According to the Energy Information Agency and the Environmental Protection Agency less than 0.24% of produced natural gas is emitted from systems operated by local natural gas utilities. Less than 0.24% of produced natural gas is emitted from systems operated by local natural gas utilities. Distribution system emissions have dropped 22% since 1990

17 Natural Gas Distribution Shrinking Emissions by the Numbers 65,100 – miles of cast iron & bare steel pipe replaced with PE plastic pipe 300,000 – added miles of distribution mains 18 million – number of new customers served (32% increase) 16% - emissions decline since 1990 *Note that this is due to an uptick in emissions related to higher throughput in 2013, relative to lower consumption in 2012. 0.26% - EPA estimated distribution system emissions as a percentage of U.S. Gross Production *Numbers reflect data collected from 1990-2013

18 Kyle Rogers Vice President, Government Relations krogers@aga.org (202) 824-7218 Find Us Online www.aga.org www.truebluenaturalgas.org http://twitter.com/AGA_naturalgas www.facebook.com/naturalgas www.linkedin.com/company/50905 ?trk=tyah


Download ppt "June 1, 2015 Smart Modernization Natural Gas Infrastructure Expansion."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google