1. Comparison Report: VS 6/13/2006 Brandon Wu Network Media Development Dept. Personal Solution Business Group SONY Corporation

2. 2006/6/13 Confidential GrouperRevver Business Model HD Content Support Hardware Integration Well developed advertisement system In-stream video advertising Banner advertising Contextual advertising Sponsorship advertising Ads attached to the end of clips ×Revenue dilution: ad revenue is distributed to creators, Revver, and people who shares the videos with others. Tracking technology on video clips Scalability achieved through the proprietary P2P software Existing software is already capable of transferring large size files Low cost for hosting company ×Viewing devices (downloading) would required a hard drive ×However, the distribution will be largely affected by the bandwidth of local clients ×Not suitable for media creation devices (uploading), which often stay offline when not in use. Client side application allows for multiple file uploading For large content providers, FTP direct uploading is available Stable storage of contents Remain control over distributed contents ×Servers bear the huge hosting and bandwidth cost ×P2P software in the pipeline but not integrated yet (www.dijjer.org) Integration with iPod / PSP (via RSS) One click webcam recording function The technology might be expandable to other hardware ×Microsoft technology required (.Net and WMP 9) N/A

3. 2006/6/13 Confidential GrouperRevver Content Filtering User Attraction Technology Relied on users reporting Low labor cost ×Copyrighted content not actively protected All videos reviewed by staff Better protection for copyrighted contents and against inappropriate contents Trusted Author Program will reduce labor cost ×Higher labor cost Integration with popular SNS sites Ability to share with groups, create rules for videos Friendly sharing environment (private/public options) ×Less differentiated from other video sharing sites Creators can earn money by uploading videos Users can earn money by sharing videos Stronger incentives for users than just expressing themselves ×Less suitable for sharing casual videos with family/friends ×Video reviewing process slows down the sharing of videos Constant innovation of new features Integration with other popular sites Focused on serving the creators - DRM Management Experienced Silicon Valley veterans Previous experiences in the Startup space – connection in San Jose Well connected with big media companies in Hollywood Understanding of the media entertainment industry Entertainment background, more direct and aggressive attitude

4. 2006/6/13 Confidential Conclusion Grouper is a better fit for eyeVi –Well developed advertising system in line with eyeVi’s business model –P2P technology applicable for HD contents in the future –Flexibility: experience in working with different hardware technologies and integrating with other websites –However, Grouper’s content filtering system might need to be adjusted for eyeVi to have a stronger control over the contents hosted Compared with Revver, Grouper appears to be better prepared for the technology required for eyeVi On the other hand, if eyeVi’s focus switches to targeting big media content providers, Revver’s relationship with Hollywood could be a big help