Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrederick Eaton Modified over 8 years ago
1
Module 41: Humanistic Theories of Personality
2
In the 1960’s, some psychologists began to reject: the dehumanizing ideas in Behaviorism, and the dysfunctional view of people in Psychodynamic thought. Maslow and Rogers sought to offer a “Third Force” in psychology: The Humanistic Perspective. They studied healthy people rather than people with mental health problems. Humanism: focusing on the conditions that support healthy personal growth. Humanistic Theories of Personality Carl Rogers Abraham Maslow
3
Maslow: The Self-Actualizing Person In Maslow’s view, people are motivated to keep moving up a hierarchy of needs, growing beyond getting basic needs met. In this ideal state, a personality includes being self-aware, self- accepting, open, ethical, spontaneous, loving caring, focusing on a greater mission than social acceptance. At the top of this hierarchy are self-actualization, fulfilling one’s potential, and self-transcendence.
4
Rogers agreed that people have natural tendencies to grow, become healthy, move toward self-actualization Acceptance, a.k.a Unconditional Positive Regard: acknowledging feelings, even problems, without passing judgment; honoring, not devaluing. Rogers’ Person-Centered Perspective Genuineness: Being honest, direct, not using a façade. Empathy: tuning into the feelings of others, showing your efforts to understand, listening well (NOT sympathy: people need to be heard, not to be pitied) The 3 conditions that facilitate growth (just as water, nutrients, and light facilitate the growth of a tree):
5
In the humanistic perspective, the core of personality is the self- concept, our sense of our nature and identity People are happiest with a self- concept that matches their ideal self Thus, it is important to ask people to describe themselves as they are and as they ideally would like to be. Assessing the Self in Humanistic Psychology: Ideal Self vs. Actual Self Questionnaires can be used, but some prefer open interview. Questions about actual self: How do you see yourself? What are you like? What do you value? What are you capable of? If the answers do not match the ideal, self- acceptance may be needed, not just self-change
6
Some say Rogers did not appreciate the human capacity for evil. Rogers saw “evil” as a social phenomenon, not an individual trait: “When I look at the world I’m pessimistic, but when I look at people I am optimistic.” – Rogers Critiquing the Humanist Perspective What about evil? Humanist response: Self-acceptance is not the end; it then allows us to move on from defending our own needs to loving and caring for others.
7
Some say that the pursuit of self-concept, an accepting ideal self, and self- actualization encouraged not self-transcendence but self- indulgence, self- centeredness. Humanist response: The therapist using this approach should not encourage selfishness, and should keep in mind that that “positive regard” means “acceptance,” not “praise. Critiquing the Humanist Perspective Too much self-centeredness?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.