1. Green Labs Symposium | March 15, 2016 Travis Wanat, Senior project manager Department of Facilities Efficient building design and operation Fueling high performance nano-research

2. Agenda Building design and integration with campus Program development and benchmarking Energy conservation measures Performance / flexibility / efficiency Site selection Construction

3. Design and campus integration 1

4. AEC Team Wilson Architects Turner Construction Company (CM) BR+A Consulting Engineers (MEP/FP/Sustainability) LeMessurier. (Structural) Kleinfelder (Civil/Materials Management) Haley & Aldrich (Geotech/Foundations) Pressley Associates (Landscape) Acentech (Acoustics & Vibration) Rolf Jensen & Associates (Code) Fennessy Consulting Services (Cost) Cavanaugh Tocci Associates (Audio-Visual) MoharDesign (Interiors) Ripman Lighting Consultants (Lighting) Abbie Gregg Inc. (Cleanroom Planner) Cleanroom Construction Associates (Cleanroom Consultant) Hallam ICS (Process Engineering) RFD (Process Benches) Vitatech (EMI) Curtainwall Design Consulting (Curtainwall Consultant) Anis Building Enclosure (Exterior Envelope Consultant)

5. AEC Team

6. Overview: Schedule 2010 Feasibility Study 2012 Programming / Design 2014 Enabling Phase 2015 Construction Phase 2018 Occupancy

7. 27,800 NSF Under Filter

9. BIO ENGINEERING CHEMICAL ENG PHYSICS CHEMISTRY … PHYSICS MECHANICAL ENG ELECTRICAL ENG PHYSICS … CHEMISTRY CMSE LNS … RLE RLE MIT.nano MTL MECHANICAL ENG LEES MATERIALS SCIENCE LMP NSE … LNS AERO ASTRO CIVIL ENG S A+P CHEMISTRY MECH ENG MATERIALS SCIENCE

13. Programming, benchmarking 2

14. Program MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE CHEMISTRY UNDERGRAD TEACHING CLEAN ROOM IMAGING / SUBFAB PROTOTYPING LABS

15. Programing a shared use facility Defining stakeholders Engaging multiple user groups for program input Defining environmental criteria for research

16. Safety Code requirements Integrating energy conservation measures Maintaining high performance program Enabling efficient operation Designing for capacity and flexibility

17. Best in class energy performance 140 Energy conservation measures (ECM’s) evaluated 60+ ECM’s were implemented 15 college and university cleanrooms analyzed

18. Best in class energy performance Stretch Energy Code Requirements Above: outperform requirements Beyond: exceed requirements, considered unique strategies

19. Best in class energy performance Exhaust heat recovery Variable Volume exhaust and Make-up 100% Filter coverage in cleanroom ceiling VAV RAHU, based on occupancy and/or particle counters Class 100 Cleanroom air change rate below 165 ACH Local reheat with low-temp make-up air Heat recovery from sub-cooling chiller Relaxed cleanroom dewpoint, allowing  49  F Tdp

20. Benchmarking targets Heat recovery from cleanroom exhaust VAV exhaust / make-up Low pressure RAHU’s w/ pressurized plenum and 100% filter coverage Reduced RAHU ACH with demand controlled flow Reheat coils in RAHU’s to provide local reheat Heat recovery from sub-cooling chiller Relaxed Cleanroom Dewpoint, allowing  49  F Tdp

21. VAV impact

22. Results and projected performance

23. Projecting LEED Gold Overall design is expected to achieve 19 points under EAc1 Optimize Energy Performance This is based on 51% energy cost savings compared to the LEED baseline.

24. Finding the right site 3

25. Site selection A B C D E

26. Vibration impact Rail and subway

27. Vibration impact Streets

28. Vibration impact Rail, subway, and streets