1. Gaza Reconstruction and Recovery Group Progress on common programme cycle management framework 25/11/15

2. Outline of this presentation 1. The planning framework: DNA and ERP 2. Stakeholder mapping 3. Recording issues, challenges, their mitigation and opportunities 4. Measuring progress: M&E

3. Ad 1: Global plan: the Gaza recovery and reconstruction framework 2014 - 2017 2014 - 2017 in Gaza, Palestine for 1,8 million people to transition from relief efforts to longer-term development Targets achieved in 5 sectors: infrastructure, productive, livelihood and social protection, social development, governance

4. Ad 1: Sectors, sub sectors and cross cutting issues

5. Ad 1: Planned timeline following ERP (not in 2015 DNA and ERRP) 4 months Humanitarian response 4 months Early recovery Assessments Funding 2014 2 months humanitarian response 8 months early recovery Detailed assessments and planning 6 months reconstruction Response to residual humanitarian needs 2015 12 months reconstruction Response to residual humanitarian needs 2016 12 months reconstruction Response to residual humanitarian needs 2017

6. Ad 2: Stakeholder map Palestinian Authority ; Line Ministries and authorities: PWH, PEA, PWA, MLG, MOSA, MOA, etc Local government and departments: governorates, municipalities Gaza Political factions and institutions Israel political leadership and institutions Gaza civil society Gaza private sector International civil society and NGO's International partners ; UN agencies, Worldbank, EC, Arabic country donors, traditional donors, other donors

7. Ad 2: Stakeholders: champions and detractors Gaza Recovery and Reconstruction Plan: infrastructure, productive, livelihood and social protection, social development, governance,

8. Ad 3: Recording challenges, opportunities and issues: what are the mitigation instruments and who is responsible? OpportunitiesChallengesIssuesLevel Local Gaza Palestine International

9. Ad 4: Measuring and communicating results: why? Purpose: To inform/ be accountable to affected people; To increase national ownership To increase stakeholder engagement; To inform policy, strategy and programme; To improve programme efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability; To identify issues, challenges, weaknesses, opportunities and strengths;

10. Ad 4: Planning framework DNA and ERP provides: – Much Gaza baseline information; – And could be more granulated; A 4 year planning framework – Sector and sub sector wise; – However could be more area based, vulnerability targeted, or benchmarked in quality, quantity and time – Local area based planning is proposed, however is it implemented? Issues and challenges are mentioned, and some management solutions proposed

11. Ad 4: Baseline information GoP, governorates, municiplaities DNA (I)NGO’s, UN, WB Palestine partners: EU, Sources 2014 Do no harm principle used, some proxy baseline info. Has gender, vulnerability sufficiently been raised. Is the information “SMART”. Quality Direct or indirect? Survey? PCBS? Per sector and sub sector. Per area: governorate, municipality Sources: assessments, reports Means of verification

12. Ad 4: Planning per sector, some considerations 3 time frames ( “short” or “relief” - 6 months, “medium” or “early recovery” - 12 months, and “long” or reconstruction – timing unclear, till end 2017? ), 5 sectors, 14 sub-sectors, 5 governorates, 25 municipalities.. Is the planning sufficiently “SMART”? Is decentralized planning sufficiently practiced? Which stakeholders are active in which sector and sub sector? In which governorate and municipality? Which funds have been pledged for which sector and when?

13. Ad 4: Indicators for informing the PA The following information is collected and shared by NORG: Pledges by donorsResponse and disbursement Assessments by sector made available Housing, shelter IssuesHousing, electricity, water, economy, health, Achievements by sectorHousing, electricity, water, economy, health, education Monitoring instruments and sources Ministry reports, donor/ partner reports (especially Qatar, Saudi, Kuwait), UNRWA, UNDP, UNOPS, World Bank, GRM (construction material, contracts)

14. Ad 4: Eg: Housing sector data gathering 1.1. Housing 11.1.1. Financial Assistance for reconstruction and rehabilitation of totally, severely and partially damaged housing units in the Gaza Strip governorates. 1.1.1.1. No. of totally damaged housing units reconstructed "self-help modality" HU11.028HU 1.1.1.2. No. of totally damaged housing units reconstructed "Housing Schemes" HU 1.1.1.3. No. of severely damaged housing units repaired and rehabilitated HU6.821HU 1.1.1.4. No. of partially damaged housing units repaired and rehabilitated HU152.670HU 21.1.2. Transitional Support (Rental/Host family support for IDPs) 1.1.2.1. Number for households who receive transitional cash support for rental of alternative housing HH17.849HH 1.1.2.2. No. of Temporary shelters for IDPs ShelterTBDShelter 31.1.3. Reintegration Package - One-time household items allowance for those with uninhabitable housing( assuming 500$ x 17,057 households) 1.1.3.1. No. of household who received reintegration package one time HH17.849HH 41.1.4. Establishment of Information Management Systems and monitoring while strengthening MOPWH 1.1.4.1. Existing operational MIS within MOPWH established % of achieveme nt TBD% of achieve ment 51.1.5. Urban and neighborhood planning within the five most damaged localities in the municipalities of Beit Hanun, Beit Lahiya, Gaza City, Khuza’a and Ash Shoka 1.1.5.1. Number of Urban plans prepared Nr of plans5 1.1.5.2. Number of municipalities having enhanced spacial planning Nr of municipalit ies 5 61.1.6. Technical assistance ‘self-help’/ owner driven approach for improved housing, skills and building practices 1.1.6.1. Number of households who received Technical Assistance HH17.057HH 71.1.7. Public information and outreach for informed decision making 1.1.7.1. Number of Communication materials/spots published ?? TBD?? 81.1.8. Access to building materials for Reconstruction1.1.8.1. Number of households who received construction materials for those who have damaged houses ??1.302?? 91.1.9. Legal Assistance to address protection, rights and improved speed and efficiency in reconstruction 1.1.9.1. Number of households/individuals who received legal/Admin Support HHTBDHH 101.1.10. To resume service delivery and access to goods and services 1.1.10.1. Number of IDPs Provided with temporary water and sanitation services IDP's (?)TBDIDP's

15. Ad 4: proposed steps to develop M&E 1.Finish indicators; responsible? 2.Baseline definition. Suggest to include: a) source; b) date collected; c) Verification by GoP; 3.Agree on benchmarking: annualized or time defined planning is necessary!! 4.Develop further the architecture for more efficient and timely data collection. 5.Suggest: developing an online tool/ software, operational by end January. ToR to develop? UNOPS? 6.Suggest: strengthen UNSCO’s coordination role with eg the establishment of a “PMSU” or other functionality. 7.Suggest: enhance NORG’s capabilities with MIS & GIS, and online registering. ToR’s to develop. Possibly on the medium term with PCBS?