Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLoraine Cole Modified over 8 years ago
1
BO1-1 Calorimeter Trigger 402.06.03 W. H. Smith, L3 Manager, Calorimeter Trigger, 402.06.03 Director’s Review Draft January 21, 2016 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 1
2
WBS definition Basis of Estimate Schedule Cost and Labor Profiles Risk and Contingency R&D status and plans ES&H and QA Summary 2 Outline Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith
3
3 402.0X Organization Chart to L3 (L4 for tracker) Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith 402.06 Trigger Jeff Berryhill (FNAL) 402.06.03 Calorimeter Trigger Wesley Smith (UW) 402.06.04 Muon Trigger Darin Acosta (UF) 402.06.05 Track Correlator Rick Cavanaugh (UIC)
4
W.S. (U. Wisconsin) – US CMS HL-LHC L3 Calorimeter Trigger Project Manager CMS Trigger Project Manager 1994-2007, Trigger Coordinator 2007 – 2012 Trigger Performance and Strategy Working Group 2012 - 2015 US CMS L2 Trigger Project Manager (construction and operations) 1998 – present US CMS Phase 1 Upgrade L2 Trigger Project Manager 2013 – present Sridhara Dasu (U. Wisconsin) US CMS L3 Manager for Calorimeter Trigger (construction and operations) 1998 – present US CMS L3 Manager for Phase 1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 2013 – present Author of original and upgrade cal. trig. Algorithms 1994 – present Pam Klabbers (U. Wisconsin) – Cal. Trig. On-site Manager CMS Regional Calorimeter Trigger Operations Manager (more than a decade on RCT project) CMS Deputy Trigger Technical Coordinator Jeff Berryhill CMS & US CMS Phase-1 Stage-1 Calorimeter Trigger Project Manager Tom Gorski (U. Wisconsin) – Cal. Trig. Electrical Engineer – Lead Engineer Over a decade of engineering on the CMS Calorimeter Trigger Delivered final phase of original Regional CMS Calorimeter Trigger Delivered Phase 1 Layer-1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade Electronics Ales Svetek (U. Wisconsin) – Cal. Trig. Firmware Engineer 3 years on Phase 1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade Firmware (4 years ATLAS Beam Conditions Monitor Firmware, DAQ, Commissioning, Detector Operations) Marcelo Vicente (U. Wisconsin) – Cal. Trig. Firmware Engineer 3 years on Phase 1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade Firmware + HCAL Firmware 2 Years on ECAL Phase 1 Upgrade Trigger Primitive Generation Electronics (oSLB, oRM) Jes Tikalski (U. Wisconsin) – Cal. Trig. Software Engineer 3 years on Phase 1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade Software and embedded systems 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 4 CMS Calorimeter Trigger Personnel
5
WBS Definition 5 Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith
6
Level-1 Trigger Architecture 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 6 U.S. covers fraction (mostly regional) Calorimeter Regional Trigger Calorimeter Global Trigger
7
402.06.03.01 Calorimeter Trigger Management 402.06.03.01.01 Calorimeter Trigger Milestones, Interfaces 402.06.03.01.02 Calorimeter Trigger Travel 402.06.03.02 Regional Calorimeter Trigger 402.06.03.02.01 Regional Calorimeter Trigger M&S (Detail Next Slide) 402.06.03.02.02 Regional Calorimeter Trigger Engineering 402.06.03.02.03 Regional Calorimeter Trigger Technical Work 402.06.03.02.04 Regional Calorimeter Trigger FW 402.06.03.02.05 Regional Calorimeter Trigger SW 402.06.03.03 Global Calorimeter Trigger 402.06.03.03.01 Global Calorimeter Trigger M&S 402.06.03.03.02 Global Calorimeter Trigger Engineering 402.06.03.03.03 Global Calorimeter Trigger Technical Work 402.06.03.03.04 Global Calorimeter Trigger FW 402.06.03.03.05 Global Calorimeter Trigger SW 402.06.03.04 Calorimeter Trigger Infrastructure 402.06.03.04.01 Crates and Power Supplies M&S 402.06.03.04.02 Cables, Fibers and Patch Panel M&S 402.06.03.04.03 Test Facilities M&S 402.06.03.04.04 Infrastructure Engineering 402.06.03.04.05 Infrastructure Technical Work 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 7 402.06.03 WBS: Calorimeter Trigger I
8
402.06.03.02.0X, (X=1,2) (Regional, Global) Calorimeter Trigger M&S 402.06.03.02.0X.1 Cal. Trig. Preproduction Optics 402.06.03.02.0X.2 Cal. Trig. Preproduction FPGAs 402.06.03.02.0X.3 Cal. Trig. Preproduction Misc. Comp. 402.06.03.02.0X.4 Cal. Trig. Preproduction PCB Fabrication 402.06.03.02.0X.5 Cal. Trig. Preproduction Assembly 402.06.03.02.0X.6 Cal. Trig. Optics 402.06.03.02.0X.7 Cal. Trig. FPGAs 402.06.03.02.0X.8 Cal. Trig. Misc. Comp. 402.06.03.02.0X.9 Cal. Trig. PCB Fabrication 402.06.03.02.0X.10 Cal. Trig. Assembly 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 8 Calorimeter Trigger M&S Detail
9
EB/EE/HB/HE: Process individual readout granularity cells from Calorimeter Back-end (Trigger Primitive Generation – TPG) electronics to be optimally matched with track trigger information Produce Tau, Jet, e/γ clusters…. New Endcap calorimeter TPG electronic produces clusters with Tau, Jet, e/γ topologies which are then processed for optimal matching with track trigger info. Data processed by input Regional Layer and then final Global Layer providing the output. Similar to current calorimeter trigger, essentially scaled to higher number of channels involved. Tasks: Isolation, duplicate removal, boundaries, global energy sums Produces/refines candidate objects/clusters to send to the different track correlator processors o Logic is based on adaptation of Particle Flow ideas to L1T o Different correlators for muons, e/γ, Tau, Jet…. Also provides stand-alone calorimeter trigger 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 9 Calorimeter Trigger Design
10
Crate BCrate CCrate A Processor Track Correlator …… Regional Processing: Global Processing: Model for L1 Cal. Trigger Hardware 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 10 Base processors on existing CMS Virtex7 trigger processor cards cluster ECAL using fine granularity information for e/γ candidates for track matching/veto + track isolation, and use wider H clusters behind for veto, etc. Global Trigger Stand-alone calo. trig. output: e/γ, τ, jet, E tmiss, E T HCALECAL HGCAL HF HCALECAL HGCAL HF HCALECAL HGCAL HF
11
L1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade Calorimeter Trigger: Process individual crystal energies instead of present 5x5 towers Higher resolution matching to tracks: ΔR < 0.006 Improvement in stand- alone electron trigger efficiency + rate→ 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 11
12
M&S costs are based on escalated prices of similar components used for the Phase 1 upgrade of the L1 trigger. Details on next slide Labor costs are estimated from engineers currenlty on staff, or on standard rates as needed. Effort calculated as per the Phase 1 Trigger Upgrade Project. International travel is estimated at $3K per trip, and domestic travel is estimated at $1K per trip. 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 12 Basis of Estimate
13
21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 13 Cost Estimate (from CMS Phase 2 TP) EB Channels (via Back-End Elect)61200# of xtals EE Channels (via Back-End Elect) – New Endcap61000 Use # of Shashlik channels temporarily until #’s from HGCAL available HB/HE Chan. (via Back-End Elect)13824From HCAL Phase 1 HF Channels (via Back-End Elect)1728 From HCAL Phase 1 but combine 2 measurements/PMT Information per channel (bits)12assume 10 bits energy and 2 bits quality Total Bits1653024 Bandwidth (bits/sec)6.61E+13Data transmitted at 40 MHz Card BW (bits/sec)4.92E+11 Assume present cards with 80x10 Gbps links running 192 bits at 40 MHz with 80% packing efficiency No. cards in Layer 1135 Cards This number of cards assumes the present Phase 1 Upgrade Boards Add 33% more cards for Layer 2179 Cards Multiply by 15 k$/card + 15% Spares + 16 k$/12 Cards Infrastucture3.5 M$ NB: Estimate done with Phase 1 CTP7 (Virtex7) card capabilities and costs. For Phase 2 Expect UltraScale, Ultrascale+ FPGA costs higher, but fewer boards used (next slide).
14
Cost Driver: FPGAs 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 14 Virtex 7 Ultrascale Ultrascale+ Virtex 7 used in CMS Phase 1: 80 x 10 Gbps transceivers = 800 Gbps Ultrascale+: 120 x 30 Gbps transceivers = 3600 Gbps (e.g. 4.5 x V7) Virtex 7: retail cost now: $7.5K ea. Ultrascale+: unofficial estimated retail cost: $15K ea. (e.g. twice V7 cost) (~ 50% of Phase 1 Cal. Trig. cost)
15
15 Construction Schedule Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith FY25 FY24 FY23FY22FY21FY20 FY19FY18 FY17 CD4 CD1 CD2 CD3 CD0 Specification and Technology R&D Trigger TDR Pre- production Installation LS 2 LS 3 Physics LHC Schedule CDR PDR CD3A FDR Prototyping and Demonstrators Production Readiness Review Production and Test Test & Commission
16
16 Cost Cost = AY $M (No Contingency) L3 AreaM&S*LaborTotalR&D Calorimeter Trigger884K2079 K 2963K535K 21-Jan-2016 W. SmithPhase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade *Includes Travel
17
17 Cost Profile Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith
18
18 Labor FTE Profile (double click to edit numbers) Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith
19
C&S understood since based on Phase 1 Trigger Upgrade Systems experience Cards are extrapolations of existing Phase 1 Trigger Upgrade Cards C&S based on experience of the same team that built and wrote software and firmware for Phase 1 Trigger Upgrade 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 19 Cost and Schedule Risks
20
Senior Engineer becomes unavailable (Low Risk) Hire new engineer, subcontract to consulting firm, use FNAL engineer Software or Firmware does not meet requirements (Low Risk) Hire extra expert effort to recover schedule and help personnel Boards are delayed (design, manufacture or testing) (Low Risk) Hire extra effort to speed up testing schedule Vendor non-performance (Low Risk) Acquire spending authority to use alternative vendors (while original funds are being unencumbered). Input or output electronics (non-trigger) delayed (Low Risk) Built in capabilities of trigger electronics provide signals for their own inputs & outputs 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 20 Managed Trigger Risks & Mitigation
21
Safety: follows procedures in CMS-doc-11587, FESHM L3 Manager (W.S.) responsible for applying ISM to trigger upgrade. o Under direction of US CMS Project Management. Modules similar to others built before, of small size and no high voltage Quality Assurance: follows procedures in CMS-doc-11584 Regularly evaluate achievement relative to performance requirements and appropriately validate or update performance requirements and expectations to ensure quality. QA: Equipment inspections and verifications; Software code inspections, verifications, and validations; Design reviews; Baseline change reviews; Work planning; and Self-assessments. All modules have hardware identifiers which are tracked in a database logging QA data through all phases of construction, installation, operation and repair. Graded Approach: Apply appropriate level of analysis, controls, and documentation commensurate with the potential to have an environmental, safety, health, radiological, or quality impact. Four ESH&Q Risk levels are defined and documented in CMS-doc-11584. 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 21 Trigger ESH&Q
22
After full testing at institute, shipped to CERN All tests recorded (of all types) for individual boards in database Tests use and validate software and firmware test release Acceptance Testing in Electronics Integration Center (EIC) at CERN Individual labs for CSC and Calorimeter Trigger Boards retested to validate institute test results Tests use software and firmware test release Integration Testing in EIC Row of racks with DAQ, Trigger, Central Clock, Crates of other subsystem electronics Operation of a vertical slice with electronics to be tested installed. Tests use and validate software and firmware commissioning release Integration Testing at P5: Global Runs/Parallel Operation Test with all CMS with cosmics when beam not running/with beam when running Electronics installed in final locations with final cables Full-scale tests with full CMS DAQ/Trigger/Clocking Tests use software and firmware commissioning release Handover to Operations at P5: Global Runs/Parallel Operation After testing completes, continue with Global Runs/Parallel Operation Validate software and firmware initial operational release 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 22 QA/QC: Testing and Validation
23
Phase 2 Trigger Algorithm R&D Goal: Allow development of calorimeter, correlation trigger electronics – specify: o Planned Algorithms o Necessary trigger primitives o Link counts and formats Plan (with CMS HL-LHC Technical Proposal Milestones): Initial definition of trigger algorithms, primitive objects and inter- layer objects (TP.L1.1) – 2QCY16 Baseline definition of trigger algorithms, primitive objects and interchange requirements with subdetectors. (TP.L1.3) – 2QCY17 Detailed Software emulator demonstrates implementation of core phase 2 trigger menu with baseline objects (TP.L1.4) – 4QCY17 o Used to inform the final implementation of the trigger hardware. 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 23
24
Phase 2 Trigger Hardware R&D - I 2 R&D activities: Calorimeter Trigger Processor Track Correlator Processor Hardware R&D Milestones - I Initial demonstration of key implementation technologies (TP.L1.2) – 4QCY16 o e.g. > 25 Gb data links, general applicability across Phase 2 o Start Construction of initial prototype circuits for demonstration of feasibility of trigger design, leads to: Definition of hardware technology implementation baseline (TP.L1.5) – 1QCY18 o Testing and revisions of prototypes. o Used with algorithm and emulation baseline to define what is needed for → 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 24
25
Phase 2 Trigger Hardware R&D - II Hardware R&D Milestones – II Full-function prototypes produced which allow local comparison with emulator (TP.L1.6) – 4QCY18 o First boards which have sufficient channels, processing capability and bandwidth optical links to meet the requirements of the final boards o These boards will cover only a portion of the trigger processing logic, however, and only local comparisons will be possible between hardware behavior and the emulator. Demonstrator system shows integration and scaling, global/full- chain comparison with emulator (TP.L1.7) – 4QCY19 o End-to-end comparisons over a slice of the detector which include multiple full-capability prototype boards and the prototype full-capability infrastructure o Goal of demonstrating a prototype system with its infrastructure and testing environment capable of being connected to its front end detector for test-beam validation to follow. Final Milestone: Phase 2 Trigger TDR (TP.L1.8) – 1Q2020 o Based on results from Trigger Demonstrators. 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 25
26
Phase 1 upgrade: two generations (V5, V6) before production boards—similar path reasonable for Phase 2 Phase 2 upgrade working terminology: “APDx”—Advanced Processor Demonstrator, APD1 for gen-1, APD2 for gen-2, etc. o Evolution of the successful CTP7 architecture, staying current with advances in FPGA, SoC, PCB, embedded OS and optical technologies o Supported by simpler auxiliary boards as necessary (RTMs, etc.) APM—Advanced Processor Module—Phase 2 production platform Today: CTP7 a very capable “Gen 0” demonstrator Supporting Phase 2 Tracking Trigger and Calorimeter Trigger R&D Comparatively “young” platform (< 2 years old) w/ new technology Receiving interest from other groups as an upgrade and/or Phase 2 R&D platform 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 26 Phase 2 Cal. Trig. Demonstrators
27
CTP7 “Gen zero” demonstrator 12 MGT MicroTCA backplane links 67 Rx and 48 Tx 10G optical links Modular V7 firmware architecture for ease of customization Currently have 4 different configurations in P5 and R&D use 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 27 CTP7 as a Phase-2 Demonstrator 12 Backplane MGT Connections (plus DAQ) 10G capable frontpanel optical links, 67 Rx and 48 Tx
28
MicroTCA.0—the MicroTCA for Phase 1 MicroTCA.4—a standard with a rear transition module (RTM) about the same size as a double-width AMC MicroTCA.4 shares payload power between AMC and RTM New Vadatech chassis (VT815) supports 12 full size AMC+RTM combinations with 120W per slot ATCA—older standard, physically larger Shape of the RTM in ATCA limits its utility, but overall ATCA provides about 2X the board and frontpanel area as MicroTCA.4 IPMI: CMS-common IPMI solutions (MMC, System Manager) supplied by Wisconsin can easily migrate to ATCA Board costs and FPGAs Xilinx UltraScale at about same cost/gate as Virtex-7, but gate/MGT ratios are higher in UltraScale—MGTs drive part selection in CMS FPGA costs are going to dominate over form factor costs in the high performance applications 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 28 Upgrade Form Factors
29
Processi ng FPGA(s) Next-gen FPGA and ZYNQ SoC devices General upgrade to embedded Linux platform over CTP7 Direct optical interfaces for the ZYNQ PL section DDR4 SDRAM on main FPGA for higher density and bandwidth Optical module mix for compatibility with current and next-gen optical links 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 29 APD Architecture Example Processin g FPGA(s) ZYNQ SoC High BW DDR4 SDRAM System Memory GbE Control Path Optical Interfaces Front Side Optical Interface Flash File System Flash File System Backplane/RTM MGT Links
30
Summary 30 Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade21-Jan-2016 W. Smith
31
R&D Program will result in designs for the Trigger Upgrade that will meet technical performance requirements Scope and Specifications of Trigger Upgrade are sufficiently well-defined to support the C&S estimates Upgrade based upon common hardware platforms and components ES&H, QA plans, C&S based on experience with original trigger construction and Phase-1 upgrade Management and Engineering teams are experienced with sufficient design skills, having designed and built original CMS trigger and Phase-1 Upgrade 21-Jan-2016 W. Smith Phase 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade 31 Conclusions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.