1. SOCRATES Program Intelligence Support
WELCOME TO
USSOCOM INDUSTRY DAY
SOCRATES Program Intelligence Support

2. Welcome! Rules of Engagement Government Team Introductions
Christopher Harrington, Director U.S. SOCOM Small Business
Gary Salava, Chief SITEC Contracting Office
Jerry McGhee, Contracting Officer
Greg Brauer, Primary Contracting Officer Representative
Heath Headrick, J2
Mike McDermott, J2
Malachi Keddington, J2
Gaylen Ordway, PEO C4 Program Manager - SOCRATES
One-Way Guard SIPR to JWICS and One-Way Guard NIPR to SIPR projects were eliminated due to Defense Information Assurance Security Accreditation Working Group (DSAWG) mandate.
SOF Information Data Layer Development Layer realigned under the DCGS-SOF program.

3. USSOCOM OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
BOI:
SOCRATES: 2458 (2245 Workstations 213 EIW's)
SOIS/JSOC: 3445 (3220 Workstations 225 EIW)
Grand Total is 5,903, supports ~8000 users
Mr. Christopher Harrington
Director, U.S. Special Operations Command
Small Business Programs

4. USSOCOM OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
Over the next 18 months
Approximately 31 +/- SITEC Application Management Task Orders will expire over the next 18 months
Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Approximate value $200M

5. Small Business Program
FY14 ($M)
FY15 ($M)
Reporting Through 30 Sep 15

6. OSBP POCs Chris Harrington, Director, Small Business Programs
Angela Mitchell, Small Business Administrator

7. The Recompete Schedule
Mr. Jerry McGhee
USSOCOM SOF AT&L KS
Contracting Officer

8. Quick Disclaimer About the Recompete Schedule
All source selection start dates are subject to change
The list is a current “as is” state of SITEC Application Management
All requirements on this list still need to be reviewed for continued performance
Some requirements may be accelerated, some may be deleted some will remain as projected for source selection
A very low percentage (<1%) of these requirements may get rolled into SITEC II enterprise if it is in the best interest of the Government.
A very low percentage (<1%) of these requirements may get recompeted on GSA Alliant
Some requirements may get deleted based on needs of the Government
Some new requirements may get added (highly likely!) to this list.

9. The Contracting Officer’s Plan on the Recompete Schedule
My plan is to publish this recompete list on GSA Alliant Small Business as an 18 month Recompete Schedule
It will remain open for 18 months on eBuy
My plan is to update the recompete schedule every quarter or as required if it is a significant acceleration.
If a requirement is deleted I will attempt to offer an explanation if at all possible.
The intent is to allow the 68 GSA Alliant Small Business prime contractors an opportunity to team and forecast their bid and proposal budgets to target requirements that are well within your capability.

10. AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY

11. USSOCOM CONUS Combatant Commands
NAVSOC
USASOC
MARSOC
NAVSOC
AFSOC
USSOCOM

12. 2015 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current Contract #
TO#
Source Selection Start Date
New Contract Award Date
Gov’t Customer
FTEs
Description
Notes
L-3
H D-0021
0001
1 OCT 2015
10 JAN 2016 J2 5
Provide training support services to USSOCOM Enterprise users at all levels of experience, covering all intelligence-related applications and subject areas. The Intel Training Team shall also work with representatives of all task orders, regardless of the vendor affiliation, to craft training appropriate to emerging subject areas.
Currently being recompeted on GSA Alliant Small Business
0007
Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) software development and system administration support for all imagery and geospatial data in a Common Intelligence Picture/Common Operational Picture (CIP/COP) architecture, to include CIP/COP software development and system administration
Being recompeted with TO 0002 on GSA Alliant Small Business

13. 2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current
Contract #
TO#
Source Selection
Start Date
New Contract
Award Date
Gov’t
Customer
FTEs
Description
L-3
H D-0021
0016
23 May 2016
24 SEP 2016 J3 1
Support all phases of solution planning, implementation, and finalized production that the WTCF OPT requires
Pragmatics
H D-0024
0001
25 May 2016
26 Sep 2016
NSWC 8
development, migration, testing, documentation, integration, and maintenance of GOTS/COTS web-based software, database development software, and application development software; provide end-user training for developed and legacy software solutions
0020
27 May 2016
28 Sep 2016 20
development, testing, migration, documentation, and maintenance of NAVSOC portal, web, application, and database services that support functionally diverse business processes within NAVSOC and its subordinate units, to include their tactical operations. Provide sustainment support for the SWALIS, SWIFT & other current and legacy GOTS / COTS applications. Support NAVSOC Knowledge Management objectives.
BAH
H D-0018
0002
1 Jun 2016
8 Sep 2016
PEO-C4 5
Implementation of PKI and development of associated software
0023
16 Jun 2016
17 Sep 2016
J32
The DefenseReady application implemented will provide USSOCOM with a single enterprise-level system that is capable of meeting current and future personnel and organization management and readiness requirements. This effort provides the overall maintenance and sustainment of the application that has been implemented.
SRA
H D-0020
25 Jun 2016 J2 4
development, migration, testing, documentation, integration, and web-based software, database development software, and application development software in support of Biometrics and Identity Operations

14. 2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current
Contract #
TO#
Source Selection
Start Date
New Contract
Award Date
Gov’t
Customer
FTEs
Description
SRA
H D-0020
0001
26 Jun 2016
27 Sep 2016
AFSOC 3
Enhancements, maintenance and support for SUASMAN, a web based application supporting DoD-wide unmanned aerial vehicle logistics and operations
BAH
H D-0018
0004
1 Aug 2016
1 Dec 2016 10
AFSOC SF Dev, Legacy App, business process, MS Project
0005
MARSOC 2
MARSOC SharePoint and web application development and maintenance
BAE
H D-0023
6 Aug 2016
7 Dec 2016 1
operational and development systems that include Microsoft (MS) Office SharePoint servers, MS Office Communicator servers, MS SQL servers, MS Internet Information servers, and other collaborative systems as directed and identified by the AF EIS program managers
L-3
H D-0021
10 Oct 2016
11 Jan 2017
PEO-C4 6
Provide both consultant and technical solutions to support ISP baseline sustainment, software-specific training, improvements, implementation, and enhancements to the ISP production, survey, and visualization systems. Including providing planning, technical, integration, testing, and software maintenance activities for the ISP
SOFM 11
database and application maintenance, development, and administration services to fulfill the requirements of the Financial Systems and Applications owned and used throughout USSOCOM/SOFM and other USSOCOM users with related financial systems requirements

15. 2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current
Contract #
TO#
Source Selection
Start Date
New Contract
Award Date
Gov’t
Customer
FTEs
Description
L-3
H D-0021
0006
10 Oct 2016
11 Jan 2017 J2 6
developing web- and server-based portals, databases, and applications. This task applies to the Intelligence Directorate, Headquarters, U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) in support of current and future mission objectives
Pragmatics
H D-0024
0003
12 Oct 2016
13 Jan 2017
JSOU 2
SharePoint portal management support, web part development and integration, and business process automation services to JSOU; provide database administration and programming services
0010
31 Oct 2016
1 Feb 2017
SOCS 7
improve HQ USSOCOM's key business processes and provide rapid response to technical issues encountered by the USSOCOM staff—to include Components and Theater Special Operations Commands (TSOC)—related to deployed workflow solutions
0011 J3 5
Provide SharePoint portal application development and management support, web part development and integration, and business process automation services for the J3 under direction of the Chief, J3 Collaboration and Information Sharing Office (CISO)
0012
USASOC
Content and Information Management services for the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) Knowledge Management (KM) Program. The contractor shall provide a wide range of KM services to USASOC, its Major Subordinate Commands and Major Subordinate Units (MSC/MSU), and warfighters around the globe
0004 3
USASOC Sensitive Activities (formerly named ACE) for planning, engineering, and testing of web portal and database intensive applications into an existing architecture.

16. 2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current
Contract #
TO#
Source Selection
Start Date
New Contract
Award Date
Gov’t
Customer
FTEs
Description
Pragmatics
H D-0024
0005
31 Oct 2016
1 Feb 2017
USASOC 16
portal, web, database, and development support in support of USASOC centric applications
BAH
H D-0018
0011
1 Dec 2016
1 Apr 2017
PEO-C4 9
SOF AT&L Enterprise Architecture expertise, SharePoint portal management support, web/portal development and integration, mobile development and integration, application programming interface development and integration, business process automation services, and configuration management services
L-3
H D-0021
0021
SOCS 4
create and sustain effective portal sites around USSOCOM's most important information and processes. This environment will consist of portal site collections for each Center, Directorate, and unique business activities for the HQ USSOCOM collaboration portal farm.
0024
11 Dec 2016
11 Mar 2017 2
Develop, administer, and maintain local MS Office SharePoint portals (NIPRNet, SIPRNet, ACCM). Portal/site administration will include user account control, management of performance, and clarification of new capabilities and requirements. Contractor database support shall include monitoring and performance tuning, identification of data repositories, and the potential for expanded use of stored 160th SOAR (A) data.

17. 2017 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business
Incumbent
Current
Contract #
TO#
Source Selection
Start Date
New Contract
Award Date
Gov’t
Customer
FTEs
Description
Pragmatics
H D-0024
0006
4 Jan 2017
5 May 2017
SRSE 34
development, systems engineering, integration, and maintenance efforts to field, standardize, modernize, sustain, and maintain the DCGS-SOF system
L-3
H D-0021
0013
8 Jan 2017
9 Apr 2017
AFSOC 1
provides generalized and specialized training throughout USSOCOM and AFSOC that is tailored to meet the local Command’s objectives. The types of training available include: ad hoc, user-specific, formal, one-on-one, classroom-oriented, and others depending on users’ needs.
0022
SOC
NORTH
application development/maintenance support for SOCNORTH. SOCNORTH will primarily be using Microsoft SharePoint portals hosted by NORAD‐NORTHCOM (N‐NC), US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), and Intel Link. In addition, SOCNORTH will be touching numerous data systems that may require data synchronization
CACI
H D-0022
0004
26 Jan 2017
27 Apr 2017
SOF AT&L K 3
Provide SPS technical, functional, system administration, and management support for the SOCOM SPS user community
BAH
H D-0018
0009
13 Apr 2017
14 Jul 2017 J6 9
HQ SharePoint and web application development and maintenance, HP Trim application development, records management and maintenance supporting KM/RM
0007
15 Apr 2017
16 Jul 2017
NAVSOC 2
support the continued analysis and development of existing business systems for the NSW Training and Resources Management System (NTRMS).

18. SOCRATES PROGRAM INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT
SOCRATES INDUSTRY DAY
SOCRATES PROGRAM INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT
19 OCT 2015

19. SOCRATES BACKGROUND
Description: SOCRATES is the USSOCOM SCI intelligence automation enterprise architecture to include the JSOC SOIS that directly supports USSOCOM’s global mission by providing a seamless and interoperable interface to SOF, DoD, national, and service intelligence information systems. It provides the capabilities to exercise command and control, planning, collection, geospatial collaboration, automated mapping services from NGA, data processing, video mapping, and a wide range of automated intelligence analysis, direction, intelligence dissemination, imagery tools and applications, as well as news and message traffic.
Key Performance Parameters:
Availability, Reliability, and Sustainment
Enterprise Protection and Enterprise Baseline Updates
Enterprise Metrics and Asset Management
SOF Intelligence KM
Net-Ready
BOI:
SOCRATES: 2458 (2245 Workstations 213 EIW's)
SOIS/JSOC: 3445 (3220 Workstations 225 EIW)
Grand Total is 5,903, supports ~8000 users

20. SOLICITATION
This acquisition is a CPFF, which includes a base performance period of 12 months and four 12-month options.
Technical is significantly more important than Past Performance, which is more important than Task Order Cost.
Three Separate CLINS
Labor
Travel
IT Acquisition
Award determination will be based on the proposal that represents “best value” to the government. This permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to award to other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

21. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW SGE Hardware/Software Operations & Maintenance
Technical Support for NGA, AFRL, and NRL Intelligence Tools
SOCRATES Intelligence Training
Application Testing
J24 Knowledge Management Support
Hardware and Software Acquisitions
Staffing
Transition-In/Out

22. PAST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Provide two examples of past performance under a federal contract/task order that show relevant past performance in which the work performed was similar in scope and complexity to the requirements described in the SOW.
The Government will evaluate the technical similarity, quality, timeliness, and customer satisfaction of the contractor’s performance. In evaluating past performance; the Government reserves the right to use data obtained from other sources as well as that provided in the proposal. This includes information contained in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

23. PRICING OVERVIEW
Offerors shall submit a cost proposal, consistent with their Alliant contract, with supporting information for each cost element, including, but not limited to: direct labor (based on Alliant Contract labor categories), fringe benefits, overhead, general and administrative (G&A) expenses, facilities capital cost of money, ODCs, and profit consistent with their cost accounting system, provisional billing rates, and forward pricing rate agreements.
The cost proposal shall include a Basis of Estimate (BoE) that explains the rationale for proposed costs and contains a concise level of detail to fully support the review of the proposal. The BoE shall discuss the methodology used to prepare the cost proposal.
Offerors shall clearly explain the application methodology for all indirect rates. These rates will be used in the evaluation when calculating the Offeror’s total cost.

24. EVALUATIONS OVERVIEW # FACTORS RATING METHOD 1 Technical Color 2
Past Performance
Assigned Rating 3
Task Order Cost/Price
(Sum of the Basic year plus the four 1-year options)
Most Probable Cost (MPC)

25. TECHNICAL RATING OVERVIEW
RATINGS
Color
Description
Blue
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Purple
Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Green
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow
Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red
Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

26. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING OVERVIEW
Past and Present Performance Factor Ratings
RATING
Description
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds
many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual
performance of the element or sub-element being assessed
was accomplished with few minor problems for which
corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Very Good
some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual
was accomplished with some minor problems for which
corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual
performance of the element or sub-element contains some
minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the
contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements
and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual
performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious
problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear
or were ineffective.

27. PRICING OVERVIEW
The Cost/Price Team will evaluate the Offeror’s cost/price proposal by determining reasonableness and realism, using one or more of the techniques in FAR CPFF Contracts (with compliance in FAR15.404), to arrive at a Most Probable Cost (MPC). The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated for award based upon the proposed price for the entire period of performance (including option years).

28. NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (NDIA)
Mike Cummins
President, NDIA Tampa Bay Chapter
Joe Wotton
Secretary, NDIA Tampa Bay Chapter

29. CONCLUSION
Questions?