1. 1 AMS Annual Meeting; 12 th Annual Symposium on New Generation Environmental Ops Satellite Systems New Orleans, LA - January 13, 2016 Decompressed, Calibrated, Navigated, and Resampled ABI L1b Band 7 (3.9um) from a GOES-R Data Ops Exercise Uses GOES-R Mission Validation Test Data Set (MVTDS) generated by ABI Proxy Team at CIMSS Image Courtesy of GRATDAT and David Pogorzala Matthew Seybold GOES-R Data Ops Manager and PRO Team Lead NESDIS/OSPO/SPSD Jon Fulbright PRO Team Deputy Lead NESDIS/GOES-R/GSP

2. 2 GOES-R PRO (Product Readiness & Ops) Team 13A-2 Dev I&T Harris CWG Fred Wu (STAR) AWG Jaime Daniels (STAR) GRB Simulators Harris IT Services Interfaces with External (Non-GOES-R) Assets Product Operations Manager “OSPO DOM” Matt Seybold (OSPO) Deputy – Jon Fulbright Alg & Product Dev Lead Randy Race Product Quality Lead Jon Fulbright Product Ops Lead (includes Cal/Val L2+) “PAL” Wayne MacKenzie (OSPO) UPS Ops Lead (GRB, HRIT/EMWIN) “PAL” Acting – Kathryn Miretzky User Services Kathryn Miretzky Cal/Val L2+ & L1 Support Elizabeth McMichael L1 Cal Tools Dave Pogorzala Change Support Ryan Williams GOES-R Assets Non-GOES-R Assets User Services Support NRAP Dan Nietfeld Vacant Positions Dev Support TBD NOAA Fed (OSGS) Quality Support TBD NOAA Fed (GOES-R) Slide Collaborators: The entire PRO Team and many external collaborators from CWG, AWG, Harris, and NWS PRO is the primary user readiness interface from GOES-R to data consumers (Dev, Quality, Product & Service Ops, User Coordination Structured specifically for ease of transitioning user readiness & support activities from the GOES-R Program to OSPO User Services Support TBD NOAA Fed (OSPO) UPS Ops TBD NOAA Fed (OSPO) NWS & Sat P.G. NWS & NESDIS NRAP NWS Liaison Deputy – Dan Nietfeld

3. 3 Outline PRO Talks at AMS Data Release Strategy Data Access Interfaces L1b Status User Support

4. 4 PRO Team Talks at AMS Pre-LaunchPost-Launch L1b L2+ Talk 4.2, Matthew Seybold & Jon Fulbright Talk 4.3, Wayne MacKenzie A shared approach to deliver content from our team to you the users Encourage your visitation to all of the PRO team talks and posters

5. 5 PRO Team Posters at AMS Pre-LaunchPost-Launch 1/13 1/12 Poster 749 Data Rehearsals Kathryn Miretzky Poster 734 Post-Launch Tests Elizabeth McMichael Poster 357 Algorithm Change Process Ryan Williams Poster 768 GRATDAT L1b Tool David Pogorzala

6. 6 DATA RELEASE STRATEGY

7. 7 GOES-R Schedule Milestones

8. 8 Data Release Strategy Ground Segment internal flow of instrument data: Commences upon completion of each instrument’s outgassing – Data will flow for path integrity test purposes to PDA and AWIPS – Data will flow for instrument vendor and CWG Cal/Val purposes to LZSS – Data will not be released from LZSS, PDA, AWIPS to any other downstream consumers other than instrument vendors, CWG, and CLASS. The Unique Payload Services (GRB, HRIT/EMWIN, DCS) will also not yet distribute data. – First media image(s) for ABI will be released after Orbit Raising and initial image navigation and radiometric assessment

9. 9 Data Release Strategy External product distribution (PD): Commences upon completion of each instrument’s Post-Launch Tests (data will have Beta Maturity) – Unique Payload Services [GRB, HRIT/EMWIN, DCS] will be populated – LZSS, PDA, AWIPS will flow data to their respective, integrated, downstream consumers – Estimated dates for completion of each instrument’s Post-Launch Tests: SUVI @ L+77, ABI @ L+87, EXIS @ L+89, MAG @ L+92, SEISS @ L+139, GLM @ L+148 (See chart on next slide) Internal Flow

10. 10 Data Release Strategy Operations Handover from GOES-R to OSPO: L+6 Months Internal Flow External Distribution

11. 11 Data Release Strategy GOES-R Assignment to East or West Position: L+12 Months Internal Flow External DistributionOperations Handover

12. 12 Data Release Strategy Internal Flow L+15 Days External Distribution L+78 Days Operations Handover L+6 Months East/West Assignment L+12 Months Instrument Distribution Commences SUVIL+78 ABIL+88 EXISL+90 MAGL+93 SEISSL+140 GLML+149

13. 13 Product Maturity Levels Beta—the product is minimally validated and may still contain significant errors, based on product quick looks using initial calibration parameters. Provisional—product performance has been demonstrated through a large, but still (seasonally or otherwise) limited, number of independent measurements. The analysis is sufficient for limited qualitative determinations of product fitness-for-purpose, and the product is potentially ready for testing operational use. Full—product performance has been demonstrated over a large and wide range of representative conditions, with comprehensive documentation of product performance, including known anomalies and their remediation strategies. Products are ready for operational use. For each L1b and L2+ to advance to each of the three validation maturity levels, it must go through a PS-PVR. The purpose of the PS-PVR is as follows: Provide sufficient evidence through presentation of calibration/validation analyses and findings that the GOES-R data products have achieved each validation maturity levels according to program definitions. Appropriate path(s) forward for resolving remaining data products issues must be presented. Review panel will review materials and declare products at a maturation level, or provides guidance on work expected to achieve the expected level. Review panel consists of stakeholder members such as OSPO, STAR, OSGS, NWS and more. Peer Stakeholder Product Validation Review (PS-PVR)

14. 14 Data Release Strategy Declaration of Maturity Milestones occurs at Peer-Stakeholder Product Validation Reviews (PS-PVRs) Internal Flow L+15 Days External Distribution L+78 Days Operations Handover L+6 Months East/West Assignment L+12 Months

15. 15 PLPT Science Validation Success Criteria: Determination GOES-R LIRD, MRD, PORD Requirements Instrument Design, Fabrication, and Test Instrument Performance Model Analysis to Predict On-Orbit Product Performance GOES-R CONOPS Defined PLPT * Analysis Methods and Val Reference Data Spatial/Temporal Coverage Limits (in RIMPs) PLPT Analysis to Determine On-Orbit Product Performance Comparison between determined and predicted on-orbit product science performance GOES-R Post-Launch Validation: The process of determining that the deliverable item satisfies its intended use in its intended environment. GOES-R Pre-Launch Verification: The process of determining that the deliverable item meets specified requirements, using methods such as test, demonstration, analysis, and inspection. BENCH -MARK * Post Launch Product Test

16. 16 DATA ACCESS INTERFACES

17. 17 ESPC Data Distribution of GOES-13/14/15 & GOES-R (Effective when PDA & GOES-R both Operational) CLASS NSOF in Suitland, MDWCDAS in Wallops, VA GOES-R PDA Users NSOF: NOAA Sat Ops Facility WCDAS: Wallops Command and Data Acquisition Station AWIPS: Sectorized CMI GRB: ABI & Spc Wx L1b + GLM L2 GVAR: L1b PDA: L1b & all L2+ GEODIST: McIDAS ADDE GOES-R Data System GOES-13/14/15 Data System Data Distribution Users GOES- 13/14/15 GOES-R AWIPS GRB GVAR GOES- 13/14/15 Primary Ground Segment Sites AWIPS Legend & Notes Only GOES-13/14/15 Both GOES-13/14/15 & GOES-R McIDAS GEODIST Users

18. 18 PDA (Product Distribution & Access) Enterprise (GOES, POES, Others) GUI-based customer data access portal Replaces current ESPC systems (DDS, NDE, GOES satepsdist, etc.) Provides data catalog w/ 7-day (GOES-R), 4-day (JPSS), & 3-day (on-orbit) stores Allows NetCDF4 (w/ CF metadata) users to manage access (product customization, selection and transfer method) – No longer one-size-fits-all – Data Shaping Capability – Flexible – Sectorize – Time Frequency – Mesoscale Domains – Mode Changes Supports FTPS and SFTP protocols Supports push and pull interfaces Source of data for – NCO (and EMC) Model ingest of GOES Radiances, Derived Products, and AMVs – AWIPS L1b/L2+ Derived Products Access granted to real-time users by OSPO Data Access Review Board (DARB) External Interface Testing is already ongoing with CLASS, NWS, DoD, and others Operational Readiness Review (ORR): Summer 2016, First Ops data: S-NPP Fall 2016 See Rich Baker poster today for complete timelines & integration status (#739)

19. 19 OSPO will continue to provide McIDAS ADDE access for GOES-13/14/15 data to operational users GOES-R data will be served in netCDF4 format via PDA – Users who previously employed middleware for tailoring will be able to utilize PDA tailoring capabilities for GOES-R data For users who seek to ingest GOES-R data and produce McIDAS Area files – A McIDAS-X software update coming out this month (ver 2016.1) is required to ingest GOES-R data – It natively performs netCDF4 to McIDAS AREA format conversion -to- Format Translation of GOES-R Data

20. 20 L1B STATUS

21. 21 Status for Ground Implementation of L1b Algorithm Improvements 13A-21 Instrument & Data Flight baseline Ground baseline Update planComments ABI CDRL 80 Rev ECDRL 80 Rev CSync via WRs: - WR 233: Bad detector mask - WR 267: Moon corrupting spacelook - WR 268: Scan encoder bit flip In_Work, DO.03 delivery GLM CDRL 80 Rev E CDRL 46 Rev G CDRL 80 Rev B CDRL 46 Rec C - Assess performance as implemented - Hold TIMs focused on CDRL changes - Write prioritized WRs to update L0 compatibility delivered in DO.01.00.01 SUVI CDRL 80 Rev E Sync’d via WR: - WR 321: Update to CDRL 80 Rev E Delivered in DO.02 EXIS CDRL 80 Rev G Promoted operational prototypeDelivered in DO.01 SEISS CDRL 80 Rev F Promoted operational prototypeDelivered in DO.01 MAG MAGN-04 Rev D Promoted operational prototypeDelivered in DO.01 Prototype approach maintains existing functional (but possibly performance challenged) algorithm baseline, plus an updated “prototype” algorithm in the same software release. The choice of which to run is by configuration. Favorable performance assessments by PWG determine which algorithm to operate. PG/PD processing issues are being discovered via rehearsals (DOEs, GREs) and resolved via established change management processes with goal of completion by DO.04 build DO.04 is likely the last build with patches for several months and then algorithms freeze until post-launch updates

22. 22 USER SUPPORT

23. 23 GOES-R Rebroadcast (GRB) Simulators Self-contained hardware & software with pull out keyboard and screen Available for 90-day loan periods with potential extensions Includes training & tech support Loans commenced Nov 2013 and slated through 2019 Requests: – GRBSimulator@noaa.gov Project Manager at Harris: – eczopkie@harris.com (Ed Czopkiewicz) http://www.goes-r.gov/users/grb.html

24. 24 Status of GRB Simulator Loan Project 14 borrowers, some were return customers 7 are manufacturers 5 now offer GRB solutions 2 more currently working on GRB solutions Supporting NWS Site Acceptance Tests Informed vendors of GRB packet size change which will require new round of loans for vendor regression tests and subsequent support from vendors to their customer’s sites 2 nd meeting of the “GRB User & Vendor WG” is Jan 27, 2016 Loans continue and user outreach increasing Depot Repair Available Out To User At Factory Locations Current Past / Completed HITS-Omaha UW - SSEC RT Logic Honeywell Sea Space General Dynamics Harris Industry Day & NOAA Sat Conf May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 GRB Sim 1 GRB Sim 2 GRB Sim 3 GRB Sim 4 GRB Sim 5 EEC Telespace Global Imaging Quorum Communications NHC, Miami Marta Systems Future GST NWS, College Park Lockheed Martin Unisys CIRA/CSU

25. 25 Status of GRB Simulators Locations Current Past / Completed HITS-Omaha UW - SSEC RT Logic Honeywell Sea Space General Dynamics Harris Industry Day & NOAA Sat Conf May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 GRB Sim 1 GRB Sim 2 GRB Sim 3 GRB Sim 4 GRB Sim 5 EEC Telespace Global Imaging Quorum Communications Current Status Sim 1 – At Marta Systems in Santa Paula, CA Sim 2 –At GST, Inc. in Greenbelt, MD Sim 3 – At Harris Melbourne factory to support PTR # 15096 for GRB packet size change Sim 4 – At Harris Omaha Depot awaiting shipment to NHC at Miami, FL Sim 5 – At Harris Omaha Depot awaiting shipment to NWS at College Park, MD Projected Loans Sim 1 – Marta Systems has current loan through 8 May 2016 Sim 2 – GST, Inc. has current loan through 20 Apr 2016 Sim 3 – Harris Melbourne has possession through 1 Feb 2016. Potential borrowers are Lockheed Martin or Unisys. Sim 4 –NHC in Miami, FL to support NWS GRB Antenna program sometime in Feb 2016 Sim 5 –NWS in College Park, MD to support NWS GRB Antenna program – TBD. Anticipate Feb or Mar 2016 time frame NHC, Miami Marta Systems Future GST NWS, College Park Lockheed Martin Unisys CIRA/CSU Depot Repair Available Out To User At Factory

26. 26 GOES-R Product Help Team Dual Capabilities – GOES-13/14/15 – GOES-R ESPC Help Desk at NSOF – Help Ticket submissions ESPCoperations@noaa.gov (301) 817-3880 – Anomaly Notifications Future Subscription Service – RSO Requests to SDM User Services Coordinators – Natalia Donoho (OSPO Enterprise) – Jason Taylor (OSPO Enterprise) – Kathryn Miretzky (specific to GOES-R) NESDIS OSPO (Operations) NSOF NCWCP

27. 27 AMS Annual Meeting; 12 th Annual Symposium on New Generation Environmental Ops Satellite Systems New Orleans, LA - January 13, 2016 ABI Composite of L1b Radiances from Bands 1,3,5 using GRATDAT. Data captured from DOE-3 using Mission Validation Test Data Set (MVTDS). Image courtesy of David Pogorzala. Matthew Seybold matthew.seybold@noaa.gov (443) 985-9172 Jon Fulbright jon.fulbright@noaa.gov (301) 286-8997

28. 28 BACKUP

29. 29 Data Access by Phase, Data Type, User, and Interface

30. 30 Status - GLM L1b Algorithm GS currently has frozen baseline from Oct 2012 DOE-3 revealed defects in implementation, system configuration, and test data WR-1073 (GLM events are not in the same locations as the L2+ groups and flashes) currently in work for delivery in DO.03 Additional WRs will resolve defects as root causes are determined MVTDS test data updated to represent consistent RTEP configuration Flight baseline update CDRLs delivered late Sept 2015 Extensive TIMs held on 10/14/15 and 12/2/15 focused on changes LM presented overview and Harris discussed assessment of new Flight CDRLs Additional TIM in January planned to resolve details Conducting weekly INR working meetings between Flight and Ground SMEs Further updates to CDRLs will be needed to capture resolutions Path forward Assess performance of the frozen baseline using updated MVTDS and identify defects Fix defects in current frozen baseline code through WRs Produce a prioritized list of WRs for Flight changes via updated CDRLs and TIMs Implement change WRs by priority into an operational prototype to support PLT 13A-30

31. 31 Steps to L1b L1b Image L1β DataL1α Data L1a Data L0 Data 0101010011011 1100010101010 100011010…