Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Positive “Behavior Disorders” & Supports George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Positive “Behavior Disorders” & Supports George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Positive “Behavior Disorders” & Supports George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2011 www.pbis.org www.scalingup.org www.cber.org

2 PURPOSE Examination of relationship between BD & PBIS w/ consideration of RtI, school reform, bullying, culture, & implementation science Keynote overview: All Follow-up: Administrators, coordinators, coaches, trainers, evaluators Coaching: Administrators, coordinators, coaches, trainers, evaluators

3 “Notes to Self”

4 BD & PBIS Shaping

5 “Abbreviated” SWPBS History

6 Special Education & BD

7 Sugai, G., & Horner, R. ( 1994 ). Including students with severe behavior problems in general education settings: Assumptions, challenges, and solutions. In J. Marr, G. Sugai, & G. Tindal (Eds.). The OR conference monograph (Vol. 6) (pp. 102-120). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.

8 Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M. J. ( 1996 ). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 193-256.

9 “Early Triangle” (p. 201) Walker, Knitzer, Reid, et al., CDC

10 PREVENTION SCIENCE LITERATURE Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) White House Conference on School Violence (2006)

11 “Big Ideas” from Early Years

12 Teaching Academics & Behaviors DEFINE Simply DEFINE Simply MODEL PRACTICE In Setting PRACTICE In Setting ADJUST for Efficiency ADJUST for Efficiency MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously

13 SWPBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, scalable, & logical for all students (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

14 Redesign of teaching environments…not students

15 SWPBS Theoretical Foundations Behaviorism ABA PBS SWPBS aka PBIS

16 Classroom SWPBS Areas Non-classroom Family Student w/ BD School-wide

17 SWPBS (aka PBIS/RtI) is Framework

18 SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

19 Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

20 All Some Few Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

21 Continuum of Support “Molcom” Dec 7, 2007 Prob Sol. Coop play Adult rel. Anger man. Attend. Peer interac Ind. play Label behavior…not people Self-assess

22 RtI, BD, PBIS

23 RtI Sugai, Horner, Fixsen, & Blase, 2010

24 Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

25 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems Circa 1996

26 Responsiveness to Intervention

27 ~80% of Students ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION ~15%

28 School Reform, BD, PBIS, & RtI

29 Continuum of Support for ALL “District: Literacy” Dec 7, 2007 Bianchi M.S. Specials Serrota E.S. Trek E.S. Davidson M.S. Science Masi H.S. Align supports Look M.S. Jamis E.S. Look M.S.

30 CONTEXT or SETTING CONTEXT or SETTING Teacher Practice Student Behavior School Reform District Operations Continua of Responsiveness & Support

31 Implementation of Evidence-based Practices & Systems

32 “Making a turn” IMPLEMENTATION EffectiveNot Effective PRACTICE Effective Not Effective Maximum Student Benefits Fixsen & Blase, 2009

33 Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch. Start w/ What Works Focus on Fidelity

34 Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started”

35 SWPBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org

36 Where are you in implementation process? Adapted from Fixsen & Blase, 2005

37 Preventing Bullying Behavior Sugai, Horner, & Algozzine, 2011

38 Bullying Program Component Review Purpose Maggin, O’Keeffe, & Sugai, in prep

39 Preliminary Conclusions

40 Label student Exclude student Blame family Punish student Assign restitution Ask for apology Teach targeted social skills Reward social skills Teach all Individualize for non- responsive behavior Invest in positive school-wide culture Doesn’t WorkWorks

41

42 Victim attention Bystander attention Self-delivered praise Tangibles access

43 PREVENTION De-emphasis on adding consequence for problem behavior

44 Context or Setting Context or Setting Initiator Target Bystander Staff Continuum of Behavior Fluency

45

46 www.pbis.org “Stop, Walk, Talk”

47 Reconceptualizing Culture

48 Early Conclusion… Nothing is inherently biased or culturally irrelevant about practices & systems PBIS implementation. However, we definitely can improve kid outcomes by making those practices & systems more reflective of norms, expectations, & learning histories of kids, family & community members, & school staff.

49 Behavioral Perspective on Culture

50

51 CA Sansei JA PBIS, SpEd & Kids w/ BD Sugai- Fernandez “Damn behaviorist”

52

53 Function-based Support for Tiers 2/3

54 Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan Team-based Behavior competence O’Neill et al., 1990, 1996

55 Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Desired Alternative Acceptable Alternative Typical Consequence Summary Statement O’Neill et al., 1990, 1996

56

57 Some Data

58 Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group- randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115 Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of school- wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462-473. Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133-148. Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 1-26. Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J., (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133-145. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14. Waasdorp, T. E., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (in press). The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer victimization: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions. RCT & Group Design PBIS Studies Reduced major disciplinary infractions Improvements in academic achievement Enhanced perception of organizational health & safety Improved school climate Reductions in teacher reported bullying behavior

59 Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13, 3-16. Burke, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., & Sugai, G. (2003). The efficacy of function-based interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained problem behavior: Preliminary results from a single case study. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 15-25. McIntosh, K., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Horner, R. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 8, 146-154. McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., and Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special Education, 42, 131-147. Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53-62. Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Rethinking the relationship between reading and behavior in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 100-109. Academic-Behavior Connection “Viewed as outcomes, achievement and behavior are related; viewed as causes of each other, achievement and behavior are unrelated. In this context, teaching behavior as relentlessly as we teach reading or other academic content is the ultimate act of prevention, promise, and power underlying PBS and other preventive interventions in America’s schools.” Algozzine, Wang, & Violette (2011), p. 16.

60 RTI Integrated Continuum Mar 10 2010 Academic Continuum Behavior Continuum


Download ppt "Positive “Behavior Disorders” & Supports George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google