1. Effects Of Positioning Of Complex Seating Systems (Tilt-in-space Wheelchairs) On Swallow Performance In Adults With Dysphagia And Severe Brain Injury Sarah Haynes Head of Speech and Language Therapy

2. Background Patient population Postural management Dependency (Langmore1998) Traditional dysphagia practice (Shannahan et al 1993, Davies 1994, Avery- Smith 1997) Optimal? ( Stambolis et al 2003) Research

3. Aim Identify whether changes in wheelchair positioning affect swallowing performance in adults with dysphagia and severe brain injury by: Increasing/ decreasing swallowing efficiency in pharyngeal phase Affecting risk of laryngeal penetration and aspiration Providing estimates of direction and magnitude of effect of posture on swallowing function and on risk of aspiration

4. Positions in Tilt-in-space 90 0 upright 20 0 tilt back 90 0

5. Inclusion Criteria Recruitment: 26 Age : 18-60 Single incident neurological insult FEES referral TIS History of aspiration / risk Sit 90 0 flexion

6. Methodology FEES assessment (8 x 5ml boluses) Position: tilt or upright Blind rated Primary outcome measure: Composite swallow efficiency score: 8 point P-A scale (Rosenbek 1996,Colodny 2002) Secondary outcome measures: Including head position

7. Results In 20 0 Tilt N= 21 improved swallow efficiency Reduced swallow delay Residue site: vallecula and pyriform sinuses In 90 0 upright N= 4 improved swallow efficiency Increased pharyngeal swallow delay Silent aspiration Residue all sites ( Murray 1996) NB: N=1 both good

8. Comparing Swallowing Efficiency in Upright and 20 0 Tilt Back

9. Results Mean composite swallow efficiency score in upright and tilt back positions + 1 SD. * Swallow efficiency (composite score= CS) Upright CS=7.96875 20 0 tilt back CS= 5.08173 T Test = 0.000788 ( P <0.05) Reduced score in tilt = swallow success.

10. Results LOT post injury, age, gender, aetiology, or tracheostomy status Head position Tilt =statistical significance Beneficial effect on swallow efficiency

11. Comparison of swallow efficiency in upright and 20 0 tilt back in individual participants

12. Benefits of 20 0 Tilt Oral phase and gravity (Inagaki et al 2007) Pharyngeal response time Pharyngeal residue Risk and incidence of aspiration Reduced physical effort/ hypertonicity (Herman & Lange 1999, Ekberg 1986, Morris & Klein 2000) Respiration (Chan et al 1999, Morton et al 2002) Immediate effects (Gisel 2000)

13. Practical Importance Clinical applications Challenge traditional practice One size does not fit all! Evidence for FEES and videofluoroscopy Tilt-in-space prescription NBM Reduce LOS/ acute admissions? (Field & Weiss 1989)

14. Recommendations Consider alternative position Instrumental swallowing examinations 20 0 tilt back 90 0 upright Prior to feeding Team assessment Optimum position for eating Limitations of study

15. References 1.Avery-Smith, W. “Management of neurologic disorders: The first feeding session.” Dysphagia: Diagnosis and Management (Second Edition), edited by M.E.Groher, Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 219-36, 1992 2.Chan A, Heck CS. The Effects of Tilting the Seat Position of a Wheelchair on Respiration, Posture, Fatigue, Voice Volume and Exertion Outcomes in Individuals with Advanced Multiple Sclerosis. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas, 3.2 1999): 1-14. 3.Colodny, N. “Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) using the penetration- aspiration scale.” Dysphagia 17 (2002) 308-315 4.Davies, PM. Starting Again: early rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. 1. Springer-Verlag, 1994. 5.Dejaegerl, E, et al. “Effect of body position on deglutition.” Digestive diseases and sciences 39.4 (1994): 762-765. 6.Drake, W, et al. “Eating in side-lying facilitates rehabilitation in neurogenic dysphagia.” Brain Injury 11.2 (1997): 137-142. 7.Ekberg, O. “Posture of the head and pharyngeal swallowing.” Acta Radiologica 27 (1986): 691-696. 8.Field, LH and CJ Weiss. “Dysphagia with head injury.” Brain Injury 3.1 (1989): 19-26. 9.Gisel, EG, et al. "Whole body" mobility after one year of intraoral appliance therapy in children with cerebral palsy and moderate eating impairment.” Dysphagia 15 (2000): 226-235. 10.Herman, JH and ML Lange. “Seating and positioning to manage spasticity after brain injury.” Neuro-rehabilitation 12 (1999): 105- 117. 11.Inagaki, D, et al. “Influences of body posture on duration of oral swallowing in normal young adults.” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 14 (2007): 414-421. 12.Kagaya, H, et al. “Body positions and functional training to reduce aspiration in patients with dysphagia.” Japan Medical Association Journal 54.1 (2011): 35-38. 13.Langmore, SE, et al. “Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: How important is dysphagia?” Dysphagia 13 (1998): 69-81. 14.Morris, SE and MD Klein. Pre-feeding skills. 2nd ed. TX: Therapy Skill Builders, 2000. 15.Morton, R, et al. “Aspiration with dysphagia: the interaction between oro-pharyngeal and respiratory impairments.” Dysphagia 17.3 (2002): 192-6. 16.Murray J. Manual of Dysphagia assessment in adults. San Diego: Singular Publishing 1999 17.Rosenbek, JC, et al. “A penetration - aspiration scale.” Dysphagia 11.2 (1996): 93-98. 18.Shanahan, TS, et al. “Chin-down posture effect on aspiration in dysphagic patients.” Archives of Physical Rehabilitation 74 (1993): 736-739. 19.Stambolis, V et al. “The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young normal healthy volunteers.” Dysphagia 18.1 (2003): 39-45. 20.Umeda, Y, et al. “Effect of the reclining position in patients after oral tumour surgery.” J Med Dent Sci 58 (2011): 69-71. 21.West, JF and F Redstone. “Alignment during feeding and swallowing does it matter? A review.” Perceptual and Motor skills 98 (2004): 349-358.