Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMorgan Mason Modified over 8 years ago
1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. PowerPoint ® Lecture Slide Presentation prepared by Mary J. Sariscsany, California State University Northridge DYNAMIC PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN R O B E R T P A N G R A Z I S I X T E E N T H E D I T I O N Chapter 8 Evaluation
2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assessment and Evaluation To determine whether progress is being made toward objectives Should review all phases of education Pupil progress Teacher performance Program effectiveness Formal or Informal
3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance The collection of information about student performance Crucial in providing feedback to students, teachers, parents Allows teachers to make judgments about student performance Examine skill learning and development Attitudes and values also important
4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance Common reasons for assessment Grading When based on objective data they are more credible Motivation Improvement is a strong motivator Setting reachable goals Diagnosis Reveals problems or deficiencies
5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance Placement and equalization Helps teachers place student with peer helpers Equalizes small groups to enhance learning Program assessment Reveal effectiveness and relevancy Give direction to the program Program support Defend and support Reveal what students are expected to learn Accountability
6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assessment: Process of Learning or Product of Outcomes Process Performing movement patterns and skills with emphasis on technique Product Focus on performance in measurable increments of what learners accomplish
7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance Develop athletes or teach all students Physical education has a unique role Accomplish unique physical skill and activity outcomes Learn benefits of physical activity Important because PE is different
8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance Is perfection possible in Physical Education? No absolute and exact product Perfection of skill does not occur Even the best athletes miss
9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Performance Skill refinement or skill performance? Teach how to perform Cannot guarantee that all students will be high performers Winning or feeling good? Graduate students who feel competent and willing to perform skills throughout a lifetime of activity Process of doing one’s best is important in PE Activity and participation can be enhanced through working together
10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes Psychomotor Domain Motor skills Cognitive Domain Concepts of movement performance Affective Domain Responsibility and attitudes toward PE
11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes Assessment methods Checklist rubrics Observation checklists Rating Scales Anecdotal record sheets Peer and self-assessment Written tests
15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Assess Student Outcomes
19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Grading Arguments against a grading system Grades vary between teachers and schools Emphasis not on content and product Time consuming Instruction covers all 3 learning domains Excess attention to fitness testing (standardized test) Genetic effects on performance
20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Grading Arguments for a grading system Makes PE similar to other academic areas Communicate performance Academic respect is gained Provides accountability Rewards skilled students
21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Grading Consider the following Educational outcomes versus administrative tasks Attitude versus skill performance Relative improvement Potential or effort Negative versus positive grading Letter grades or student progress report
22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Grading
23
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Institutional Outcomes Health-Related Fitness Fitnessgram (criterion-referenced standards) Aerobic capacity Body composition Abdominal strength Upper-body strength Trunk extensor strength and flexibility Flexibility
24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Institutional Outcomes Criterion-referenced health standards Represent good health not percentile standings Classifies fitness Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ) Needs Improvement
25
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Institutional Outcomes
26
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Institutional Outcomes Effective use of fitness tests Evaluate and educate students Teach personal self-testing Establish person-best fitness performance Evaluate institutional fitness goals
27
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Physical Activity Evaluate the effectiveness of the institution Pedometers are an acceptable measure Gather four days of physical activity data
28
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Physical Activity CAPA: Children’s Attraction to Physical Activity Results: if physical education is positively influencing the student’s affective domain
29
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Physical Activity
30
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness Meaningful feedback about your own teaching Do-it-yourself approach Decide what to evaluate and the best way to record and monitor data
31
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness Keys to improve teaching Difficult to find others capable of giving evaluative feedback Feedback is private with self-evaluation Steps Determine which behavior to evaluate Evaluate a single behavior at any given time Design a coding form
32
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness Behaviors to examine Instructional time Management time Practice time Dead time Response latency Student performance
33
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness
34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lesson Planning Video: Analyzing a Four-part Lesson–C Video: Analyzing a Four-part Lesson–B Video: Analyzing a Four-part Lesson–A Why is the introductory part of the lesson considered important to a successful and well- managed class? Identify four principles to follow when teaching fitness activities to young children?
35
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lesson Planning Identify why this teacher is successful in carrying out an efficient lesson? Identify the management and discipline techniques used in this video.
36
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness
37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness
38
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluate Instructional Effectiveness
39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Instructional Feedback Types of feedback Praise and Criticism General versus Specific Corrective Instructional Feedback Nonverbal
40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Instructional Feedback
41
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Active Supervision and Student Contact Effective instructors actively supervise students through movement
42
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Your Program Evaluate regularly according to program goals Philosophy of the program Instructional procedures Curricular offerings Facilities, equipment, and supplies
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.