Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDora Barrett Modified over 8 years ago
1
"Minerals for Development” (M4D) a Finnish initiative for transferring good practices to producing countries Prof. Elias Ekdahl, Director General Geological Survey of Finland TAIEX workshop on mineral resources Kyiv 19-20 May 2011
2
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Positive cycle Productive Capacities Economic Growth Poverty Reduction
3
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Transforming of natural resources to physical and intangible capitals: a #1 problem to solve Intangible Capital Physical Capital Natural Resources Capital SUSTAINABLE NON-SUSTAINABLE
4
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Value of metals, diamonds and uranium: local value-addition is necessary
5
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Terms of trade improvement 1980-2002: growing mineral production – reducing terms of trade !
6
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Flows of Seaborne Iron Ore Trade in 1960 - 2007: 121- 725 million tons Source: ThyssenKrupp Steel, Eurostat 11 exports in million tons 1 8 2 18.5 8.5 11 6.2 30 270 95 21.5 255 Three companies are controlling 71% of the seaborne iron ore trade: BHP Billiton, CVRD, Rio Tinto
7
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Iron ore: growing employment through refining Applied from: DTI South Africa (2010) workers/ton of iron
8
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Minerals value chain: 1-extractive, 2-value added Resources base Physical infra Capital Technology Fiscal revenues and reinvestment Employment Environmental & social performance Profits & New capital MOTORCATALYZER PUBLIC OBJECTIVES BUSINESS OBJECTIVES G ood governance Industrial policy Regulatory regime Information infrastructure Service institutes Human resources
9
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Finnish knowledge supply vs. partner countries´ demand
10
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 … continued
11
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Supply of M4D: three segments Environment Licensing Laws & regulations Sector S&T+I strategy and link to NIS Code of Conduct Service capacity Geo-environmental information Mineral policy (part of industrial policy) Diffusion of lessons learned ”Cluster building” Economic linkages Fiscal opportunities Geo-information (map, lab & IT (”public good”) Demand and enable Governance: enhance social capital and infra OwnershipRegulationsSocial benefits modes: R&D, projects, analyses, recommendations, education & training which target:
12
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 ZAMBIA / TANZANIA rich incentives, low fees limited benefits ZAMBIA / TANZANIA rich incentives, low fees limited benefits Improvents in mineral policies required ”converge but fit to local conditions” PERU/CHILE moderate incentives / considerable fees many benefits PERU/CHILE moderate incentives / considerable fees many benefits BOLIVIA/MONGOLIA demanding regulations benefit expectations high and rapid BOLIVIA/MONGOLIA demanding regulations benefit expectations high and rapid
13
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 LOBITO DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR NAMIBE DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR MILANGE DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR BAS-CONGO DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR Fe ore Cu, Co, Mn Au, Ni, Co Fe ore Energy (HEP, oil, gas) diamonds Source: AU/NEPAD (2006) SDIs currently under consideration with AU/NEPAD mining is the planned “anchor industry”
14
Elias Ekdahl 19 May 2011 Thank You !
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.