Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySheena Parrish Modified over 8 years ago
1
Communicative Language assessment Ministry of Education Seminars & Workshops Jahanbakhsh Nikoopour nikoopour2000@gmail.com
2
1.The Traditional Approach grammar-translation approaches to language teaching Translation, free composition, essay writing, & grammatical analysis difficult to score objectively no statistical techniques applied to validate the tests simple, but unfair to students The subjective judgment of teacher
3
2.The Structuralist Approach audio-lingual and related teaching methods objectivity, reliability, and validity of tests considered measure discrete structure points multiple-choice format (standardized tests) follow scientific principles, have trained linguists and language testers
4
3.The Integrative Approach Involves the testing of language in context & is concerned primarily with meaning & the total communicative effect of discourse Is concerned with a global view of lang Is often designed to assess the learner’s ability to use two or more skills together Does not separate lang skills into neat divisions to improve test reliability Cloze & dictation best characterize the integrative tests
5
4.The Communicative Approach Chomsky’s (1965) distinction of competence and performance Competence & performance Hymes’s (1972) proposal of communicative competence Canale & Swain’s (1980) framework of communicative competence: 1.Grammatical competence 2. Sociolinguistic competence 3.Discourse competence 4.Strategic competence
6
Framework of Communicative Language Ability
7
Bachman’s (1990)’s framework of communicative language ability: Language competence: grammatical, sociolinguistic, and discourse competence (Canale & Swain): organizational competence grammatical competence textual competence pragmatic competence illocutionary competence sociolinguistic competence Strategic competence: performs assessment, planning, and execution functions in determining the most effective means of achieving a communicative goal Psychophysiological mechanisms: characterize the channel (auditory, visual) and mode (receptive, productive)
8
Communicative Language Ability
9
4.The communicative approach Based on the needs of the learners Use is concerned with how people actually use language for various purposes while usage concerns the formal patterns of language Communicative tests are concerned primarily, if not totally, with how language is used in communication The attempt to measure different language skills in communicative tests is based on the view of language referred to as the divisibility hypothesis CTs cover the four lang skills & are designed on the basis of communicative competence
10
Four principles of communicative test design 1. start from somewhere: test makers should state clearly what they expect test takers to perform 2. concentration on content: Tasks should be constructed based on the testees’ relevant needs 3. bias for best: test makers should create a test that can exploit test takers’ performance at their best 4. working on washback: test writers should create clear scoring criteria to both teachers and test takers. Course objectives and test content are also put into consideration in the hope of promoting positive washback.
11
Five requirements for setting up a communicative test Meaningful communication: The test meets their personal needs. It promote & activate language which is useful for them. Authentic situation: Lang cannot be meaningful if it is devoid of context Unpredictable language input: In reality, it is impossible to predict what speakers will say Creative language output Integrated language skills: the use of combined language skills
12
Qualities of a good test Test reliability Construct validity Authenticity Interactiveness Impact practicality
13
authenticity The language in the test is as natural as possible Items are contextualized rather than isolated Topics are relevant and meaningful for learners Some thematic organization to items is provided Tasks represent, or closely approximate, real-world tasks
14
Types of assessment practices Diagnostic assessment Formative assessment Summative assessment Self-assessment Authentic assessment Alternative assessment Performance assessment
15
Main benefits of self-assessment Diminished intimidation Personal involvement and attitude Awareness Motivation Self-direction Beneficial long-term and post- course effects
16
Authentic assessment Performance assessment- any form of assessment in which the student constructs a response orally or in writing. It requires the learner to accomplish a complex and significant task, while bringing to bear prior knowledge, recent learning, and relevant skills to solve realistic or authentic problems (O’Malley & Valdez, 1996; Herman, et. al., 1992).
17
Alternative assessment Self and peer-assessments Oral production-student self-checklist, peer checklist, offering and receiving holistic rating of an oral presentation Listening comprehension- listening to TV or radio broadcasts and checking comprehension with a partner Writing-revising work on your own, peer- editing Reading- reading textbook passages followed by self-check comprehension questions, self-assessment of reading habits (page 416, Brown, 2001)
18
Examples of authentic assessment Portfolio assessment Student self-assessment Peer assessment Student-teacher conferences Oral interviews Writing samples Projects or exhibitions Experiments or demonstrations
19
Characteristics of Performance- based assessment Constructed response Higher-order thinking Authenticity Integrative Process and product Depth versus breadth
20
Four Steps in test construction 1. Determining What kind of test is to be made? What is the precise purpose? What abilities are to be tested? How detailed & accurate the results must be? How important is the backwash effect? What constraints are set by the unavailability of expertise, facilities, time of construction, administration, and scoring? Who will take the test? What is the scope of the test?
21
2. planning Describing the purpose of the test Describing the characteristics of test takers, the nature of the population of the examinees for whom the test is designed Defining the ability we want to measure Developing a plan for evaluating the qualities of test usefulness: reliability, validity, authenticity, interactiveness, impact, & practicality Identifying resources & developing a plan for their allocation & management Determining format 7 timing of the test Determining levels of performance Determining scoring procedures
22
3.Writing Communicative test writers should: Be experienced in test construction Be quite knowledgeable of the content of the test Have the capacity in using language clearly and economically Be ready to sacrifice time and energy
23
4. Reviewing The test items should not be reviewed immediately after its construction, but after some considerable time It should be reviewed by other teachers or testers (it is preferable if native speakers are avaiable to review the test)
24
Assessing Listening Identifying letters/numbers/words/ names Identifying functions/conversational expressions The item format Listen & put a check Listen & draw Listen & circle/match/underline Listen & write
25
Assessing speaking Responding to conversational expressions Identifying & saying the names of objects Answering questions about the items in a picture The item format Interviewing (the examiner asks questions about the students) Picture naming ( the examiner shows a picture and asks the students to label the item) Picture description (the examiner asks questions about the items in a picture) Role playing (the examinees role play the conversations)
26
Assessing Reading & writing Identifying word-meaning relation Understanding simple statements Understanding simple questions The item format Look/read & put a check or cross Look/read & draw Look/read & underline Look/read & write Look/read & circle Look/read & match
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.