Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures,

Published byAgnes Coleen West Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures, DAQ Fitting the data: method, software Work plan: schedule, progress Q & A CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 1

2 People Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 2 Physicists: Mac Mestayer, Joseph Newton Hall B Engineers: Renuka Ghoshal, Ruben Fair, Orlando Pastor, Probir Ghoshal Accelerator: Joe Meyers Survey, DAQ: Kelly Tremblay, Mark Taylor Shift Personnel: … + collaboration

3 Momentum Resolution vs. P,  Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 3 1 % 0.3 % Resolution is better at smaller angles because B-field is higher. 0.3 % Best resolution ~ 0.3 %.

4 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Physics Requirement Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 4

5 Strategy for Mapping and Fitting the CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Two types of distortions: 1.expected from design, (e.g. shrinkage at low temperature ) and 2.those due to small manufacturing differences (like one coil being shifted in z, or one coil not being wound as tight as another, etc.). Strategy to map and adjust the magnetic field: 1.use best estimate of coil dimensions to calculate the nominal field 2.calculate the error B-field, i.e.(B distorted - B nominal ), for various anticipated distortions due to manufacturing tolerances 3.after mapping, fit (B measured - B nominal ) to a sum of these error B-fields scaled by adjustable coefficients 4.calculate B-field tables using the distorted, displaced coils Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 5

6 % Change in B-field: plotted vs. radius coil stack too large by 2mm coil moved down, centered, up  2 mm increase in stack size can cause field distortions of up to a few parts per thousand  large radius surface of inner coil is most critical dimension Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 6 Effect of Distortion in Coil-Winding (one example)

7 Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 7 Need to know radius to ~ 0.1mm Map Field Near Coils  sensitive to distortions

8 Effect of Change in Coil Stack Height of 1 mm Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 8 ~ 18 Gauss change in field; ~ 0.1 % Measure 5cm steps in z

9 Establishing Magnetic Centerline Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 9 Magnetic field ~ radius 5 Gradient = 3 Gauss/mm at 5 cm  need to measure where B exceeds a few Gauss  need to measure B in bore at 5 cm or greater

10 How Are We Going to Map? Digital Voltage Meter Hall Probes in Sensor Block Three 1-dimensional probes measure ~ every 5cm in Z Measurement Tubes non-magnetic ~ 2” diameter Carbon Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 10 linear stage

11 Hall Probe Holder Z Y X Direction of movement of hall probe holder 3 single axis transverse hall probes, (orange dot indicates ‘sweet spot’) Hall probe holder 5 cm Hall Probe Holder Design Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 11

12 Hall Probe Holder: machined Delrin Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 12

13 Hall Probe Holder Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 13 3 Hall Probes: X, Y, Z All assembled in magnet measuring lab

14 Hub OOPS limits radial position Moved to 30cm radial location to no interfere with hub OOPS Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 14 Hall Probe Holder

15 Torus Mapper Prototype Test magnet field strength of ~2 Tesla enlarge gap to accommodate one measurement tube and assembly Procure and build prototype - sensor cylindrical sensor head containing three 1-dimensional Hall probes connection to translation rod electrical connections - tube tube assembly attachment and survey points - translation system - analysis and display software - control system: motion, data-taking runs, interlocks, Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 15 Operational and calibrated

16 Torus Mapper Prototype: Test Test operation of prototype Do all systems work? placement and survey rotating and moving of sensor signal readout under various conditions; noise measurement quick ‘real-time’ analysis of results Do procedures make sense? How long does a scan take? Verify reproducibility to better than 0.1% many scans, no changes changing step size changing position within magnet; removing, replacing changing orientation with respect to gravity Calibration of Hall probes Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 16

17 Fitting the Measurements Number of measurements – 6 (sectors) x 4 (x-y posn’s) x 3 (dim.) x 50 (z posn’s) = 3600 Method – fit measured deviation from ideal to adjustable parameters which scale tables of calculated deviations from ideal due to ‘unit distortions’ Number of parameters – 6 (coils) x [ 2 (movements) + 1 (expansion) ] = 18 Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 17 6 total; is 2 enough?

18 Definition of  2 sum over measurement points and dimensions table of measurements minus ‘ideals’ pre-calculated table of ideal field minus fields due to ‘unit distortions’ adjustable parameters Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 18

19 Torus Mapping Timelines Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 19 SepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul Conceptual Design Prototype: Sensor, Tube, Stage, Magnet Design Fixture Build Mapper Torus Ready for Installation Install, SurveyMapper Torus Commissioned Mapping Build Fitting Software; Verify Procedure

20 Physics Requirements : measure field to 0.1% accuracy at a radius known to 0.1mm Strategy:  where to map field : 4 x-y locations each sector, ~25 – 50 pts in z  measure actual, calculate deviation from ideal model  fit deviation from ideal to error tables : with adjustable strength Design and Prototyping  sensor built, ready for survey, prototype tests  fixtures designed, almost ready for procurement  analysis software: fitting shell built; testing with toy model Collaboration Involvement  join analysis effort; data-taking Summary Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 20

21 Back-up Slides Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 21

22 Mapping Measurements to a B-field Table (will it really work?) Build ROOT shell around Minuit fitting: done Build toy model of magnetic field: done Fill table (3600 pts.) with ideal fields Choose a distortion (coil 3 too big, e.g.) and fill distortion table Create an ‘error table’ by subtracting the tables Simulate measured data by ‘smearing’ distorted table Fit simulated data to scaled ‘error tables’  do you find that coil 3 is the (only) culprit?? Feb 23, 2016 CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping Mac Mestayer 22

Download ppt "Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures,"

Similar presentations

Field measurements of QEA magnets at KEK Mika Masuzawa May 30, 2006.

Field measurements of QEA magnets at KEK Mika Masuzawa May 30, 2006.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Vibrating Wire R&D for Magnet Alignment Animesh Jain, NSLS-II Project The alignment tolerance for a string of magnets.

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Vibrating Wire R&D for Magnet Alignment Animesh Jain, NSLS-II Project The alignment tolerance for a string of magnets.
CM-18 June 20071 The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.

CM-18 June The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.

X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,

Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,

LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.

Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/2004 1 I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.

Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515 1 LCLS.

Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
(FEA) Analysis P J Smith University of Sheffield 27 th November 2008.

(FEA) Analysis P J Smith University of Sheffield 27 th November 2008.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, 2006 1 LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,

Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Objectives Mapper machine Mapper software Simulation Corrections Fitting Future.

Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Objectives Mapper machine Mapper software Simulation Corrections Fitting Future.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Introduction Mapper machine Mapper software - Simulation - Corrections - Fitting.

Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Introduction Mapper machine Mapper software - Simulation - Corrections - Fitting.
Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.

Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.

DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
Page 1 Christian Grefe, DESY FLC Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Annual EUDET Meeting Paris, 08.10.2007 Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Christian.

Page 1 Christian Grefe, DESY FLC Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Annual EUDET Meeting Paris, Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Christian.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop 26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.

1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – 14.04.2014 Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting 14.04.14 Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.

Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.
ATLAS: SCT detector alignment and B field map. Steve Snow New Year 2005 This title describes work that has been growing from low priority at the start.

ATLAS: SCT detector alignment and B field map. Steve Snow New Year 2005 This title describes work that has been growing from low priority at the start.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google