1. Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session

2. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord. Recommendations (20 minutes) Planning Commission Scope of Review (10 Minutes) Clarifying Questions from the Commission (20 Minutes) Recess/Community Input (15 minutes) Summary of Community Input (20 Minutes) Public Comment (30 Minutes) Planning Commission Deliberation (30 Minutes) ( Deliberation past 10PM requires a vote from the Planning Commission). 2

3. Purpose of Secondary Units Rental income Living space for family and friends A form of affordable housing 3

4. Community Process October 7, 2013 Special Meeting Community Meetings on November 4th and 12th 800 Comment Cards: 243 Questions 20-30 Thematic Questions 5 Project Themes Evening permit center hours on December 4 th and 11 th City Council Meeting on December 17th Fire and Building Code Presentation on January 14th 4 http://www.ci.east-palo- alto.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=496

5. Existing Conditions 5

6. Street Conditions 6 Gardens Neighborhood

7. Public Safety/Access 7

8. Public Safety 8

9. Non-permitted Parking Reduces Available Parking Commercial Vehicles Inoperable Vehicles 9

10. Overview of Policy Issues 10

11. Neighborhood Parking No simple answers Challenges remain in neighborhoods regardless of actions on secondary units –Parking enforcement will improve conditions in some circumstances 11

12. Neighborhood Parking This discussion is outside the scope of tonight’s focus on zoning— discussion will include the Public Works and Transportation Commission and the Police Department in terms of enforcement and road repairs. 12

13. Off Street Parking Parking issues serve as a significant impediments to garage conversion and secondary units Adequate off-street parking is critical Preservation of on-street parking also critical 13

14. Off Street Parking Planning Commission evaluate elimination of covered and enclosed parking Evaluate other Parking Ordinance revisions Retain one off street parking space for second units 14

15. Off Street Parking 15 Converted Garage 20-feet Min. P.L. No Garage Uncovered Parking

16. Off Street Parking 16 Garage (Alt. 1) 40-feet Min. Tandem Parking Side Yard (Alt. 2)

17. Off Street Parking 17 This? Not This

18. Setback Standards Council recommended: –Review of zoning setback revisions and other related modifications by PC Provided minimal impact to neighbors or public safety –Retention of the 5,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size requirement for second units. 18

19. Single Family Home Setbacks Current StandardStaff Recommendations Front Setback 20-feet (25 feet for front facing garage) reduced to 20 if a patio is incorporated into design 10-feet to house 20-feet minimum to the garage Parking in setback; not prohibited or allowed Clarify--allow parking in front setback if on the driveway Side setback: 5-feet3-feet (fire protection required) Rear Setback: 20-feet10-feet, provided a minimum 750 sq. ft of usable rear yard Lot Coverage: 50%Retain standard Floor Area Ratio: 60%Reduce to 55% in accordance with administrative policy since 2003. 19

20. Recommended Setbacks Single Family Home 20 10’ 20’ 3’ 10’ Garage S.F Home

21. Detached Second Unit Setbacks Current standardsStaff Recommendations 6-feet between ADU and main house3-feet between ADU and main house Rear setback-10-feet from the ADU6-feet from the ADU Side setback-5-feet from the side property line3-feet (fire protection required) Max Unit size of 1,000 sq. ft. depending of lot size. Retain standard Second Unit Lot Coverage <25% of the rear portion of the lot Retain standard Height-15 feet maximumRetain standard 21

22. Recommended Setbacks Detached Accessory Dwelling 22 Main Home 6’ 3’ A.D.U.

23. Neighborhood Notification Notice requirements can be implemented Processes need to be more fully evaluated State law limits City review processes for secondary units City Council asked for Planning Commission input 23

24. Neighborhood Notification Recommendations (Secondary Dwelling Unit) State law limits the City’s review of SDUs to ministerial (administrative) processes— no public hearings Notice provisions may confuse the issue and be inconsistent with State law Question: Should staff continue to evaluate this issue? 24

25. Neighborhood Notification Recommendations (Garage to Additional Living Area) 25 Notification Option 1 Notification Option 2 Require an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Require no Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Includes notice of abutting property owners/neighbors No notice of abutting property owners/neighbors Any appeal considered by Planning Commission Consistent with current established policy for permitted units

26. Guest Houses (Pool House) Guest House—Generally defined as a detached structure containing only sleeping quarters and a bathroom (no kitchen) that are not to be rented separately. A distinct policy option—Zoning Ordinance does not include guest house provisions Provides alternative to garage conversion to additional living area Concern—Ongoing enforcement of no kitchen provisions 26

27. Guest Houses Examples JurisdictionKey Provisions County of Monterey -No kitchen or cooking facilities. -Shall not exceed 600 square feet. Cannot be separately rented or leased. -A Deed Restriction not allowing conversion of units is required. Solano Beach-Shall not exceed 600 square feet. -One additional parking space for this unit. -Kitchen and cooking facilities prohibited. Fresno County (Accessory Living Quarters) -Maximum sq. ft. shall be 50% of the sq. ft. of the primary residence or 1,200 sq. ft whichever is more restrictive. -Occupancy limited to family members or temporary guest -Cannot be rented separately. Los Angeles County -Cannot be sold or rented. -Lot size must be 10,000 sq. ft. or 1.5 times the normal lot size whichever is greater. -No kitchen allowed. 27

28. Summary of Staff Recommendations Eliminate covered/enclosed parking requirement for single family homes. Require one additional parking spaces for houses with 5 or more bedrooms. Permit required parking in front setback Allow tandem parking by right for single family homes. Modify setback standards for both single family homes and detached second dwelling units. Provide direction on neighborhood noticing. Incorporate guest house provisions. 28

29. Steps Tonight—Planning Commission direction to staff on ordinance revisions? February 10, 2014: Planning Commission hearing on potential code revisions—Recommendations to City Council March 4, 2014: City Council hearing on potential code revisions 29

30. Questions? 30

31. 31

32. Reference Slides Not to be used unless needed 32

33. Neighborhood Notification Recommendations (Second Dwelling Unit) 33 Notification Option 1 Notification Option 2 Retain current processRequire no Administrative use Permit (AUP) No notice of abutting property owners/neighbors Any appeal considered byConsistent with current established policy for permitted units

34. Paved Front Yards 34 Violates water quality regulations

35. Varying Rights-of-Way Weeks Neighborhood 35

36. Non-Permitted Units 36

37. Unit Prototypes 37

38. May be bedroom(s), family room, bathroom, kitchen, etc. No separate kitchen Access through existing home Removal of garage door Building/Fire Code issues less difficult Prototype No. 1: Additional Living Area in the Garage 38 Cost-$15,000-$30,000 (New or legalization)

39. Prototype No. 2: Second Unit within Converted Garage 39 Cost-$30,000 - $80,000 (New or legalization) May include bedroom(s), family room, bathroom, kitchen, etc. Separate access and utilities required Removal of garage door One additional parking space required Building/Fire Code issues more difficult than No.1

40. Prototype No. 3: Detached Second Unit 40 Cost-$80,000 plus (New or legalization) May include bedroom(s), family room, bathroom, kitchen, etc. Separate access and utilities required One additional parking space required Building/Fire Code issues more difficult than No.2 (Virtually impossible to legalize due to structure and use classification

41. 41

42. 42

43. 43

44. 44

45. 45

46. Policy Issue #2-On Site (Off Street) Parking-Options Policy Options 2a-2b (Revise Parking Ordinance to differentiate between small and large homes) 46