1. Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 2 (AIP-2) presentation to ADC/UIC meeting, Stresa, Italy AIP-2 SBA Demonstrations and discussion of UIC/AIP-2 Coordination Nadine Alameh, George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR-09-01b Task POC 8 May 2009

2. Agenda Background AIP-2 –Schedule & Themes –Communities and scenarios –Deliverables Video Demonstrations Wrap-up –UIC/AIP coordination

3. Operational Capability Operational Capability User Needs, Scenarios User Needs, Scenarios Design, Develop, Deploy Design, Develop, Deploy Architecture Implementation Pilot (AIP) Task AR-09-01b GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Task AR-09-01a support persistent implementation requirements SBA Tasks, UIC Elaboration of GEOSS Architecture

4. Slide 4 GEO Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot Lead incorporation of contributed components consistent with the GEOSS Architecture… …using a GEO Web Portal and a GEOSS Clearinghouse search facility …to access services through GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements …in support of GEOSS Societal Benefit Areas

5. Slide 5 AI Pilot has broad international participation that could only have occurred with GEO. High interest & momentum to support GEOSS. AIP Phase 1 Results – Early 2008 Elements of the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) – Initial Operating Capability established Effective development process for GEO –CFP, Kickoff, Execution, etc. –Approximately 120 organizations participated –Methods for international coordination Prepared “Architecture Implementation Report” 10 Demonstrations of Initial Operating Capability10 Demonstrations

6. AIP Phase 2 Master Schedule

7. AIP-2 CFP Responses (37 to date) ACRF BKG Caribbean Flood Team CIESIN CNES and ERDAS Compusult EPA AirNow ERDAS Titan ESA ESIP AQ Cluster ESRI ESRI Canada EuroCryoClim NOAA/NASA GOES-R and GMU CSISS NOAA IOOS NOAA NCDC NOAA SNAAP Noblis Northrop Grumman Spot Image SURA/NIMSAT/GoMO OS USGS VIEWS Washington University in St. Louis GEONETCast GEO Grid GEO-Ukraine Giovanni ICAN ICT4EO INCOSE IP3 ISPRA JAXA KDDI Mines Paris Tech NASA World Wind

8. AIP Phase 2 Themes Emphasize SBAs identified by UIC/ADC collaboration Augment the GEOSS Common Infrastructure Slide 8

9. AIP-2 Augmenting GCI GEOSS Clearinghouses GEO Web Portals GEOSS Common Infrastructure Components & Services Standards and Interoperability Best Practices Wiki User Requirements Registries Main GEO Web Site Registered Community Resources Community Portals Client Applications Client Tier Business Process Tier Community Catalogues Alert Servers Workflow Management Processing Servers Access Tier GEONETCast Product Access Servers Sensor Web Servers Model Access Servers Test Facility

10. AIP Phase 2 Themes Emphasize SBAs identified by UIC/ADC collaboration Augment the GEOSS Common Infrastructure Develop "persistent exemplars” Elaborate GEOSS Architecture –Scenarios and Use Cases –Service and Component types –Interoperability Arrangements Slide 10

11. AIP-2 Working Groups (WGs) Community WGs –Disaster Response Flood disaster management scenario –Climate Change and Biodiversity Pika Distribution scenario Polar ecosystems scenario Arctic food chain scenario –Renewable Energy Site selection process for solar and wind energy scenario –Air Quality and Health Smoke events and AQ scenario

12. Community WG Leaders Disaster Response –Stuart Frye, NASA; –Didier Giacobbo, Spot Image Health SBA: Air Quality –David McCabe, EPA –Frank Lindsay, NASA; –Stefan Falke & Rudy Husar, Washington Univ. Biodiversity and Climate Change –Stefano Nativi, CNR; –Gary Geller, NASA/JPL Energy SBA –Thierry Ranchin & Lionel Menard, Mines Paris Tech; –Ellsworth LeDrew, Univ Waterloo;

13. AIP-2 Working Groups (WGs) Transverse Technology WGs: –Portals and Application Clients –Clearinghouse, Catalogues, Registries and Metadata –Access Services: products, sensors, models –Workflow and Processing –Test Facility for Service Registration

14. Scenarios and Use Cases Transverse Use Cases support Community Scenarios Scenarios: end user view of the value of GEOSS –Focused on topics of interest to a community –Occur in a geographic Area of Interest (AOI) –Steps in a scenario are Use Cases –Scenarios developed by Community WGs Use Cases: reusable service oriented architecture –Use cases for discovery, data access, etc –Utilize Interoperability Arrangements –Use Cases developed by Transverse Technology WGs

15. AIP-2 Deliverables (GEO Task AR-09-01b) Demonstration –Demonstration of community Scenarios implemented through transverse Use Cases –Demonstrations to be recorded and made available via WWW Persistent Exemplars –Registered services (‘continuous operation’) with 99% availability (~7 hours down time a month); on a reliable network; plan for performance scaling –Nomination to operational task (AR-09-01a) Engineering Reports To be considered for GEOSS Best Practice Registry –Community Scenarios –Transverse Technology Use Cases –AIP-2 Summary Report –Technology guides

16. AIP-2 Technology Demonstrations GEO Web Portal to Clearinghouses –Compusult - Robert Thomas –ESA/FAO – Gianni Sotis, Jolyon Martin –ESRI – Marten Hogeweg Geo-Processing with WPS: Brian Falk Publish, test, register, and monitor: Hervé Caumont

17. AIP-2 Scenario Demonstrations Renewable Energy - Facility Planner: Lionel Menard Biodiversity: Pika Distribution: Stefano Nativi Disaster Management: Stuart Frye, Didier Giacobbo AQ & Health – Smoke Event: Rudy Husar, David McCabe Biodiversity: Arctic Food Chain: Stefano Nativi Biodiversity: Polar Ecosystems: Doug Nebert

18. AIP-2 Renewable Energy Scenario 7 May 2009 Lionel Menard – Mines ParisTech & Team

19. Real Business Use Case Scenario Investors and electricity producers willing to invest in solar plants need precise and thorough information to support decision-making. On their behalf, consulting companies perform feasibility studies in order to decide where to sit power plants and which technology to use ensuring a profitable return on investment. To reach that goal, consultants need an easy and unified access to data sets. Such data sets include meteorological, geographical and environmental parameters. Download KMZ file From user concern… …to on-line data and map delivery JSR-168 Portlet Client input/output selection: Area Of Interest (AOI) Output scale Optional layers Output result as a KMZ archive containing: Solar radiation layers (GeoTIFF) Additional geographical and/or environemental layers

20. Scenario Goals 1. Federate the RE Community towards GEOSS Interoperability Concepts (provide as much as possible standard access to Energy related catalogues and resources) 2. Demonstrate interoperability concepts through a real use case for “Sitting Solar Power Plants” Scenario Achievements Identify, check and validate, candidate resources (~20) for the RE SBA & Scenario Follow a complete Search & Discovery GEOSS recommendation approach Use standards to achieve the RE scenario:  Deploy W3C Web Service providing access to solar radiation data and maps  Add selected additional Services (OGC/WMS) from GEOSS partners  Developped a RE Web Service Community Portal (www.webservice-energy.org)  Create INSPIRE ISO 19119 Metadata for each deployed resource  Build a Web Accessible Folder (WAF) for Catalogue purpose  Register resources and catalogue (WAF) in the GEOSS Registry  Successfully perform search and discovery within the GEOSS Portals  Create JSR-168 Portlet Client consuming Web Service for data and map retrieval

21. AIP-2 CC&Bio WG Demos Stefano Nativi (CNR), Gary Geller (NASA/JPL), Chris Ray (Univ. Of Colorado), Falk Huettmann (University of Alaska ), Mattia Santoro (CNR), Siri Jodha Khalsa (Univ. of Colorado), Eamonn O’Tuama (GBIF), David Thomas (WMO) ADC Meeting Stresa, Italy 7 May 2009

22. CC IMPACT ON PIKA DISTRIBUTION

23. Use Scenario distribution of pika and how it is changingThis scenario is driven primarily by scientific research on the distribution of pika and how it is changing. to investigate the interoperability process to determine valuable predictors for the impact of climate change on biodiversityGEOSS infrastructure perspective: to investigate the interoperability process to determine valuable predictors for the impact of climate change on biodiversity to model pika distributions and how they may change with climateUse observations of pika over the last 20 years, plus existing modeling demonstration systems, to model pika distributions and how they may change with climate Area of Interest The US Great Basin region (1x1 km) Scientific patrons Dr. Chris Ray (University of Colorado - CO USA)

24. IP3 Client & Workflow engine IP3 Distributed Community Catalog/Mediator WCS - T Other Non-OGC Services GBIF OpenModeller Server Non-OGC Services WPS (IP3 ENM) CSW req resp req GEO Portal req WCS WFS req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp Broker

25. CC IMPACT ON BIODIVERSITY/ECOSYSTEMS FOR THE POLAR AREA Arctic Food Chain Demo

26. Use Scenario maps of Arctic biodiversity, habitat and ecological service changesa summarized scenario runs with all relevant metricsThe scenario output will be as maps of Arctic biodiversity, habitat and ecological service changes, as well as a summarized scenario runs with all relevant metrics provided in a simple to comprehend table. The scenario models will allow to assess the amount and quality of Ecological Services provided by the ArcticThe scenario models will allow to assess the amount and quality of Ecological Services provided by the Arctic. The activities are intended to be linked with all relevant components of the IPY (International Polar Year). Area of Interest The Arctic (as defined as the 60 degree latitude circle) Scientific patrons Dr. Falk Huettmann EWHALE lab- Biology and Wildlife Dept., Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks

27. IP3 Client & Workflow engine IP3 Distributed Community Catalog/Mediator WCS - T Other Non-OGC Services GBIF OpenModeller Server Non-OGC Services WPS (IP3 ENM) CSW req resp req GEO Portal req WCS WFS req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp Broker

28. AIP-2 Results Disaster Management Scenario GEO ADC/UIC Committee Report 7-8 May 2009

29. Disaster Management Summary Activity involved data provider components and services and end user involvement from disaster management communities of interest Demonstrated capability to find, access, display, and use data from Myanmar, Ike, and Hannah events replayed from 2008 using Geoportal to discover SIREN community of interest portal and related data providers registered in the GEOSS registry Components and services remain ready to serve future needs, in particular, the Caribbean Flood Pilot GEO Task DI-09-02B

30. Theme-Based Flood Tasking and Product Generation From portal select desired theme(s) and area of interest Wizard picks appropriate workflow for desired result Wizard Mozambique Disaster Management Information System (DMIS) Workflows Estimated rainfall accumulation and flood prediction model Flood Model Selected workflow automatically activates needed assets and models Baseline water level, flood waters and predicted flooding

31. GEOSS Common Infrastructure: Application to Air Quality & Health SBA 7 May 2009 The Palazzo dei Congressi di Stresa Stresa, Italy Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working Group

32. Goals of AIP II for Air Quality Test and evaluate the GCI for AQ applications. Registering and retrieving AQ data through the Clearinghouse Connect AQ Applications to GCI Background Scenario: Use of a broad, common Pool of AQ observations to support a variety of decisions Data Needs Ambient Meteorology Emissions Models Satellite Decision Makers Policy maker assessing intercontinental transport AQ manager assessing an exceptional event Public planning activities today and tomorrow Air Quality Community Portal

33. Summary / Next Steps Find: CSW/RSS/ISO Bind: WMS/WCS Publish: ISO Metadata User Provider GEOSS Clearinghouse Summary 1.Three Standards suffice to accomplish Publish- Find-Bind 2.Basic flow of air quality through GCI has begun 3.Portals and Client Apps can now add value- adding services Next Steps 1.Consolidate Clearinghouse(s) so focus can be on value-adding services 2.Continue engaging GEO on User Requirements for the GCI

34. Topics after AIP-2 GIGAS: EC FP7 Project – GEOSS, INSPIRE, GMES –AIP-2 Deliverables to GIGAS –INSPIRE and GMES inputs into AIP-3 planning Coordination with UIC –GEOSS User Typology –UIC/CBC Decision Support CFP –AIP-3 SBA Identification: Water, Climate, AQ Planning AIP-3 –Coordination with ADC Data Tasks –CEOS Systems Engineering –GeoDRM and Security and data policy

35. References GEO –earthobservations.orgearthobservations.org GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot –www.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilotwww.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilot GEOSS registries and SIF –geossregistries.infogeossregistries.info George Percivall percivall@myogc.org Nadine Alameh nadinesa@mobilaps.com