Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.

Published byVirginia Sherman Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy."— Presentation transcript:

1 Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy

2 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 2 Centrality dependence We can describe p-p and central Au-Au average ratios. Can we detail the centrality evolution? Look at the particle enhancements. E(i) = Yield AA /Npart Yield pp /2 STAR Preliminary Solid – STAR Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV Hollow - NA57 Pb-Pb √s NN = 17.3 GeV

3 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 3 Centrality dependence STAR Preliminary Use stat. model info: C – p-p Strangeness suppressed GC – central A-A Strangeness saturated Transition describes E(i) behaviour T =170-165 MeV assume same T for p-p and Au-Au K. Redlich Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

4 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 4 Centrality dependence STAR Preliminary K. Redlich Correlation volume: V= (A NN ) ·V 0 A NN = N part /2 V 0 = 4/3  ·R 0 3 R 0 = 1.1 fm proton radius/ strong interactions T = 170 MeVT = 165 MeV Seems that T=170 MeV fits data best – but shape not correct Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

5 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 5 Varying T and R Calculation for most central Au-Au data Correlation volume: V 0  R 0 3 R 0 ~ proton radius strong interactions Rapid increase in E(i) as T decreases SPS data indicated R = 1.1 fm K. Redlich Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

6 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 6 N part dependence STAR Preliminary K. Redlich Correlation volume: V= (A NN )  ·V 0 A NN = N part /2 V 0 = 4/3  ·R 0 3 R 0 = 1.2 fm proton radius/ strong interactions T = 165 MeV  = 1 T = 165 MeV  = 2/3 T = 165 MeV  = 1/3 Seems to be a “linear” dependence on collision geometry Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

7 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 7 PHOBOS: Phys. Rev. C70, 021902(R) (2004) More on flavour dependence of E(i) STAR Preliminary PHOBOS: measured E(ch) for 200 and 19.6 GeV Enhancement for all particles? Yes – not predicted by model Similar enhancement for one s hadrons Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

8 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 8 Hagedorn temperature (1965) –Resonance mass spectrum grows exponentially –Add energy to system produce more and more particles –Maximum T for a system of hadrons. Blue – Exp. fit T c = 158 MeV r(m) (GeV -1 ) Green - 1411 states of 1967 Red – 4627 states of 1996 m (GeV) filled: AA open: elementary [Satz: Nucl.Phys. A715 (2003) 3c T H ~ 160 MeV T  S =  E increase √s ↔ increase S

9 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 9 Entropy and energy density Landau and Fermi (50s) Energy density,  available for particle creation Assume S produced in early stages of collision Assume source thermalized and expands adiabatically Preserve S Ideal fluid S correlated to  via EOS dN ch /d  is correlated to S

10 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 10 Entropy and √s Approximate EOS for that of massless pions. Assume blackbody s = S/V related to  s = Fn(√s)

11 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 11 N ch as measure of entropy Entropy in Heavy Ion > Entropy in p-p? J.Klay Thesis 2001 Different EOS? QGP?

12 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 12 Heavy-ion multiplicity scaling with √s PHOBOS White Paper: Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 i.e. As function of entropy There is a scaling over several orders of magnitude of √ s

13 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 13 HBT radii Entropy determines radii No obvious trends as f n of √s  HBT radii from different systems and at different energies scale with (dN ch /dη) 1/3 power 1/3 gives approx. linear scale nucl-ex/0505014 Lisa et al. ≈ 400 MeV (RHIC) ≈ 390 MeV (SPS) Works for different m T ranges

14 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 14 Eccentricity and low density limit At hydro. limit v 2 saturates At low density limit Apparent complete failure. Especially at low density! Voloshin, Poskanzer PLB 474 (2000) 27 v 2 different as f n N part and energy PHENIX preliminary

15 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 15 Fluctuations matter Important for all Cu-Cu and peripheral Au-Au PHOBOS QM2005

16 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 16 “low density limit” scaling now works Now see scaling Again dN/dy i.e. entropy important Energy range scanned from √s= 4-200 GeV

17 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 17 Strangeness vs entropy Solid – STAR Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV Hollow - NA57 Pb-Pb √s NN = 17.3 GeV No scaling between energies But does become ~linear at higher dN ch /d  dN ch /d  n pp ((1-x)N part /2 + xN bin ) n pp = Yield in pp = 2.29 ( 1.27) x = 0.13   

18 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 18 PHOBOS White Paper: Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 1000 5.5 TeV 5 6 6.4 = RHICx1.6 Most central events: dN ch /d  ~1200 LHC prediction I

19 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 19 LHC prediction II R o = R s = R l = 6 fm Most central events: dN ch /d  ~1200 dN ch /d   ~10.5

20 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 20 LHC prediction III Most central events: dN ch /d  ~1200 S ~ 20 But I suspect I’m not in the low density limit any more so v 2 /  ~ 0.2

21 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 21 LHC prediction IV dN  /dy = dN  /dy ~20-30 dN  /dy = dN  /dy ~4-6 dN  /dy = dN  /dy ~0.5-1 Most central events: dN ch /d  ~1200      0303

22 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 22 Models readily available to experimentalists Models4 parameter Fit SHARE V1.2THERMUS V2 AuthorsM. Kaneta et al. G. Torrieri, J. Rafelski et al. S. Wheaton and J. Cleymans EnsembleGrand Canonical Canonical and Grand Canonical Parameters T,  q,  s,  s T, q, s,  s,  q,  I3, N, C,  C T, B, S, Q,  s, R T,  B,  S,  q,  C,  s,  C, R Feed Downpossibledefault is with % feed-down default is no feed- down (harder to manipulate)

23 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 23 First make a consistency check Require the models to, in principle, be the same. 1.Only allow the least common multiple of parameters: T,  q,  s,  s 2.Use Grand Canonical Ensemble. 3.Fix weak feed-down estimates to be the same (i.e. at 100% or 0%).

24 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 24 The results RatioSTAR Preliminary          p/p      p                  1.01±0.02 0.96±0.03 0.77±0.04 0.15±0.02 0.082±0.009 0.054±0.006 0.041±0.005 (7.8±1) 10 -3 (6.3±0.8) 10 -3 (9.5±1) 10 -4 1.01±0.08 after feed-down increase  s decrease T 1  error Not identical and feed-down really matters Similar T and  s Significantly different errors. Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV

25 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 25 “Best” predictions (with feed-down) 0-5% THERMUS  B 45 ± 10 MeV  S 22 ± 7 MeV  Q -21 ± 8 MeV T168 ± 6 MeV ss 0.92 ± 0.06 SHARE  q 1.05 ± 0.05 (23 MeV) ss 1.02 ± 0.08 (5 MeV) T133 ± 10 MeV ss 2.03 ± 0.6 qq 1.65 ± 0.5 ss 1.07 ± 0.2 Kaneta  B 8.0 ± 2.2 MeV  S -10.3 ± 4.5 MeV T154 ± 4 MeV ss 1.05 ± 7 Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV STAR Preliminary

26 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 26 Predictions from statistical model Behavior as expected

27 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 27 Comparison between p-p and Au-Au T171 ± 9 MeV ss 0.53 ± 0.04 r3.49 ± 0.97 fm Canonical ensemble T168 ± 6 MeV ss 0.92 ± 0.06 r15 ± 10 fm Au-Au √s NN = 200 GeV STAR Preliminary p-p √s = 200 GeV STAR Preliminary

28 Helen Caines Strasbourg – May 2006 28 Conclusions dN ch /d  is strongly correlated with entropy dN ch /d  scales as log(√s) Several variables from the soft sector scale with dN ch /d  HBT v 2 at low densities Strangeness centrality dependence Statistical models Currently differences between models All get approximately the same results Also predict little change in strangeness at LHC Soft physics driven by entropy not N part

Download ppt "Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy."

Similar presentations

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,

Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.

ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
CERN May 30 2007 Heavy Ion Collisions at the LHC Last Call for Predictions Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions.

CERN May Heavy Ion Collisions at the LHC Last Call for Predictions Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions.
Strangeness production in STAR Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration.

Strangeness production in STAR Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, 2003 1 Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.

Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.
STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,

STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,
Source Dynamics from Deuteron and Anti-deuteron Measurements in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Hugo E Valle Vanderbilt University (For the PHENIX Collaboration)

Source Dynamics from Deuteron and Anti-deuteron Measurements in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Hugo E Valle Vanderbilt University (For the PHENIX Collaboration)
QM08 J. Schukraft 1 What else can one do with ? pp at LHC: plenty of everything..  Lots of energy: 14 TeV  Lots of time: several months/year Lots.

QM08 J. Schukraft 1 What else can one do with ? pp at LHC: plenty of everything..  Lots of energy: 14 TeV  Lots of time: several months/year Lots.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.

Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.
1 A simple model to study the centrality dependence of observables from SPS to RHIC energies inspired by the first CuCu results to extract the physics.

1 A simple model to study the centrality dependence of observables from SPS to RHIC energies inspired by the first CuCu results to extract the physics.
Helen Caines Yale University SQM – L.A.– March 2006 Using strange hadron yields as probes of dense matter. Outline Can we use thermal models to describe.

Helen Caines Yale University SQM – L.A.– March 2006 Using strange hadron yields as probes of dense matter. Outline Can we use thermal models to describe.
1 Statistical Models and STAR’s Strange Data Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.

1 Statistical Models and STAR’s Strange Data Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
Hadronic Resonances in Heavy-Ion Collisions at ALICE A.G. Knospe for the ALICE Collaboration The University of Texas at Austin 25 July 2013.

Hadronic Resonances in Heavy-Ion Collisions at ALICE A.G. Knospe for the ALICE Collaboration The University of Texas at Austin 25 July 2013.
ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept. 2001 in Datong, China.

ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept in Datong, China.
Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.

Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.
Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)

Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)

Similar presentations

Ads by Google