1. c h a t h a m U N I V E R S I T Y Physician Assistant Program Development and Implementation of a Holistic Approach to Admissions Luis A. Ramos, PA-C, Susan Hawkins, PA-C, Mark Hertweck, PA-C

2. Welcome from the FDI David J. Klocko MPAS, PA-C University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

3. Turn on your computer’s speakers! Use the Audio Setup under the communicate tab if you have any problems If you don’t have speakers: Dial: 408-600-3600 Event Number: 669 683 065 ## How to Get Audio

4. Objectives Describe how diversity in the classroom, including racial and ethnic diversity, enhances the educational experience of all students Identify the key legal and policy trends associated with access and diversity efforts in higher education

5. Objectives Identify program-specific, diversity- related policies that can advance the educational goals of PA programs Construct a program’s diversity self- assessment survey and action plan Develop and implement a holistic approach to admissions at PA programs

6. Why is diversity in the classroom important? Luis A. Ramos, MS, PA-C

7. Introduction The following is a summary of the statement of the American Council on Education entitled "On the Importance of Diversity in Higher Education“ PAEA was not a member and was not listed as an endorsing organization

8. Background Educational institutions and organizations agree that diversity in student bodies, faculty, and staff is important to fulfill their primary mission: providing a quality education

9. Statement The public is entitled to know why institutions believe so strongly that racial and ethnic diversity should be one factor among the many considered in admissions and hiring

10. Reason #1 Enriches the educational experience We learn from experiences, beliefs, and perspectives different from our own This is best taught in richly diverse intellectual and social environments

11. Reason #2 Promotes personal growth Challenges stereotyped preconceptions Encourages critical thinking Helps students learn to communicate effectively with people of varied backgrounds Strengthens communities and the workplace

12. Reason #3 Prepares students to become good citizens Fosters mutual respect and teamwork Helps build communities whose members are judged by the quality of their character and their contributions

13. Reason #4 Enhances economic competitiveness Sustaining the nation's prosperity require us to make effective use of the talents and abilities of all our citizens in work settings that bring together individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures

14. Conclusion Achieving diversity does not require quotas or warrant admission of unqualified applicants It does require that we continue to be able to reach out and make a conscious effort to build healthy and diverse learning environments

15. Questions?

16. Key Legal and Policy Trends Mark Hertweck, MA, PA-C

17. Rationale for a New Policy Minority health care providers deliver disproportionate care to minority populations Racial-ethnic concordance of patient and provider results in improved communication, trust, and patient satisfaction

18. Rationale for a New Policy Patients prefer providers who share their own cultural, linguistic, and racial backgrounds Institute of Medicine recommends increased provider diversity as an action aimed at minimizing or eliminating health disparities

19. Rationale for a New Policy Underrepresented student diversity Can result in an improved educational experience for all students Could reduce or eliminate health care disparities

20. Supreme Court Decision Underrepresented student diversity Is the only rationale for race conscious admissions policies that has been accepted by the supreme court Must be applied to each individual

21. Supreme Court Decision Admit a group of students who individually and collectively are among the most capable Substantial promise for success in school Strong likelihood of succeeding in practice Contributing to the wellbeing of others Mix of students who will respect and learn from each other

22. Supreme Court Decision Focus on academic ability coupled with a flexible assessment of applicants’ Talents Experiences Potential to contribute to the learning of those around them

23. Supreme Court Decision Evaluate each applicant based on all information available on file, including Personal statement Letters of recommendations Essay describing the ways in which the applicant will contribute to life and diversity

24. Supreme Court Decision Even the highest possible scores do not guarantee admission nor does a low score automatically disqualify an applicant Policy requires admissions officials to look beyond grades and test scores to other criteria that are important to the institution’s educational objectives

25. Supreme Court Decision The policy does not restrict the types of diversity contributions eligible for “substantial weight” in the admissions process, but instead recognizes “many possible bases for diversity admissions”

26. Supreme Court Decision By enrolling a “critical mass” of [underrepresented] minority students, the institution seeks to ensure their ability to make unique contributions to the character of the institution

27. Questions?

28. The Evidence in the US Population

29. Diversity Rates Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2007 Annual Social and Economic Supplement With degrees US Population

30. The Evidence in PA Education

31. Diversity Rates Health professions programs’ diversity rates: 6-9% PA programs’: 21-25% So is there a problem?

32. URMs-Overall Rates 1997-2007 PAEA Annual Demographic Reports, AY 1997-8 through AY 2007-8 URM Overall

33. When URM rates are factored in, the profession’s rate remains the highest of all other health professions.

34. Masters Overall-URMs ‘97-’07 PAEA Annual Demographic Reports, AY 1997-8 through AY 2007-8 URM Overall

35. Call to Action: Can the Chatham University PA Program Impact the Diversity of Our Student Body? Susan Hawkins, MS, PA-C

36. Background Chatham PA Program started in 1995 Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) awarded

37. Years reflect graduation dates No DiversityNo URM

38. Diversity Rates Overall diversity rate: 3.4% 20.6 points below PA national average (24%) URM rate: 2.4% 5.6 points below PA national average (7.5%)

39. Possible Barriers Interviews (interviewer bias, language skill) Writing exercise (language skill, evaluator bias, inter-reader reliability) Cost of travel to the University Emphasis on GPA (overall and science) Number of prerequisite courses Absence of diversity as a prioritized mission of the program

40. Selection Process Class of 2009 Pre-requisite courses General Chemistry (2 semesters) General Biology (2 semesters) General Psychology (2 semesters) Anatomy/Physiology (1 semester each) or Anatomy and Physiology (2 semesters) Developmental Psychology (1 semester) Genetics (1 semester) Statistics

41. Selection Process Class of 2009 Admission Requirements Overall and science (3.0) GPAs CASPA application Baccalaureate degree Shadowing Form Written Essay (decisive factor) Interview (decisive factor) Applications received: 365

42. Rationale for Changes No outcomes correlation to support continuation of the following barriers: Developmental Psychology Genetics Statistics GPA Interview Written exercise (not conclusive)

43. Phase One -Class of 2010 Collected data on those that were inconclusive – no positive predictive value, some negative predictive value Eliminated all prerequisites which were deemed as barriers Eliminated the interview process Ranking by GPA Applications received: 525

44. Phase Two -Class of 2011 Written exercise assessment modified (remote option) No requirement to come on campus prior to selection Implemented Holistic Review Process No GPA ranking Applications received Class of ‘11: 765

45. Holistic Review Process What qualities make an excellent physician assistant? How can the physician assistant class more closely represent the population at large? What type of student do we want to have in our classroom?

46. Holistic Review Process Selection based on total credits rather than any one criterion Minimum requirements must be met Pool of applicants considered for acceptance show substantial promise for success

47. Holistic Review Process Four Major areas evaluated Sustained Academic Performance Personal characteristics Personal attributes Personal Experiences

48. Sustained Academic Performance Overall GPA of 3.5 and above or induction into a national honor society Research, publications, or presentations Advanced degrees or training

49. Personal Characteristics Cultural background Ethnicity / Race Gender Socioeconomic status

50. Personal Attributes Leadership Enthusiasm Trustworthy Honesty Motivation Confidence Tolerance Altruism Goal oriented Team player

51. Personal Experiences Life adversities and struggles Multilingual ability Contact with other cultures or travel Work experience, especially in healthcare Military or government service Voluntary service Chatham student or alumni

52. Phase Three-Class of 2012 Written exercise assessment eliminated No requirement to come on campus prior to selection Continued Holistic Review Process Applications received Class of ‘12: 1,319 Including PR cohort (149)

53. Diversity Rates by Class Class of 2009 (50 students) 2% (2% URM) 7.4% economically disadvantaged (prev. NR) 13% Male (up from 6%) 2% students over 30 y/o (up from <5%) Phase I – Class of 2010 (63 students) 5% (5% A and no URM) 3.4% economically disadvantaged 17% male 1.7% students over 30%

54. Diversity Rates by Class Phase II – Class of 2011 (72 students) 17% (7% A and 10% URM) 21% economically disadvantaged 22% male 18% students over 30 y/o Phase III - 2012 (77 students) 26% minorities (11% A, 7% AA, 8% Hisp) 12.3% economically disadvantaged 29% male 20.4% students over 30 y/o

55. Conclusion Elimination of barriers a factor in increasing diversity but not significantly Implementation of the holistic approach to admissions had a much bigger impact

56. Conclusion Further research Retention rates need to be monitored Continue to monitor the percentage of economically disadvantaged students When do we reach a critical mass?

57. We still need to make progress toward achieving a critical mass of diversity.

58. Questions?

59. Thank you for participating You will shortly receive a brief survey from Webex A new window will pop up with the survey as soon as you close your browser window We would appreciate it if you would complete the survey, to help us enhance future webinars If you have any questions, or suggestions about webinars, please contact Erica Call at the PAEA National Office at ecall@paeaonline.org