Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPercival Norton Modified over 8 years ago
1
08/08 A rmaments C ooperation I nternational
2
08/08 Defense Acquisition Management Framework Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System Operations & Support BA Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support C Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development Full Rate Production Decision Materiel Development Decision Sustainment Disposal Low Rate Initial Production Full-Rate Prod & Deployment Integrated System Design System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration
3
08/08 Defense Acquisition Management Framework Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System Foreign Military Sales USD (Policy) LOAs Operations & Support BA Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support C Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development Full Rate Production Decision Materiel Development Decision Sustainment Disposal Low Rate Initial Production Full-Rate Prod & Deployment Integrated System Design System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration DISAM
4
08/08 Defense Acquisition University DISAM Defense Acquisition Management Framework Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System Foreign Military Sales USD (Policy) LOAs International Armament Cooperation Programs USD (AT&L) International Agreements Operations & Support BA Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support C Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development Full Rate Production Decision Materiel Development Decision Sustainment Disposal Low Rate Initial Production Full-Rate Prod & Deployment Integrated System Design System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration
5
08/08 International Programs Security Handbook Very few U.S. defense articles will not be sold or shared with an ally sometime during the article’s life Planning for foreign participation must start early in the acquisition process FMS 20XX ? DoD Acquisition Strategy
6
08/08 Plan for potential foreign participation: 1.Cooperative Opportunities Document (COD) 2.Program Protection Plan (PPP) 3.Technology Assessment/Control Plan (TA/CP) 4.Delegation of Disclosure Authority Letter (DDL) 5.Program Security Instruction (PSI) DoD Acquisition Strategy
7
08/08 Anti-Tamper (AT) Measures SAMM requires ALL LOAs for materiel to include this note: The USG may incorporate Anti-Tamper protection into weapon systems and components that contain Critical Program Information. The AT protection will not impact operations, maintenance, or logistics provided that all terms delineated in the system technical documentation are followed.
8
08/08 Purchaser Decision Model IDENTIFIED REQUIREMENT CONDUCT DOMESTIC RDT&E & PRODUCTION PARTICIPATE IN COOPERATIVE PROGRAM
9
08/08 Purchaser Decision Model IDENTIFIED REQUIREMENT CONDUCT DOMESTIC RDT&E & PRODUCTION PARTICIPATE IN COOPERATIVE PROGRAM BUY EQUIPMENT Other EQUIPMENT US EQUIPMENT
10
08/08 Purchaser Decision Model IDENTIFIED REQUIREMENT CONDUCT DOMESTIC RDT&E & PRODUCTION PARTICIPATE IN COOPERATIVE PROGRAM BUY EQUIPMENT Other EQUIPMENT US EQUIPMENT PARTICIPATE IN COOPERATIVE PROGRAM
11
08/08 Russia & India Collaborate on Fighter By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESS, MOSCOW, 10/17/07 Russia and India will collaborate on building a new fifth generation fighter plane. We are collaborating on missiles, a new combat plane and on a multipurpose transport plane... demonstrating the strategic nature of Russo-Indian cooperation,” Kurian Antony said at a high-level meeting in Moscow. The Russian Defense Minister pointed out the importance of military cooperation between the two countries currently shown in the joint construction of the Su-30 MKI fighter plane and the T-90 tank. In fact, India is no longer content simply to purchase arms but now favors joint productions thanks to the transfer of technologies.
12
08/08 Objectives 1. Operational Interoperable systems Broader military-to-military contact Shared logistics support 2. Economic Share RDT&E costs on new systems Reduce production costs through larger & longer runs Reduce support costs through shared infrastructure 3. Technical Access the best global technology 4. Political Strengthen relationships Incentive for arms export restraint 5. Industrial Bolster industrial base
13
08/08 OSD and MILDEPs ASD (GSA) ASD (GSA) Director, Planning and Analysis Director, Planning and Analysis Dir, Pacific Armaments Cooperation Dir, Atlantic Armaments Cooperation Secretary of the Army Secretary of the Navy SAF/IA USD (AT&L) Director International Cooperation GENERAL COUNSEL USD (C) SECDEF ________________ DEP SECDEF SECDEF ________________ DEP SECDEF Secretary of the Air Force DASA-DE&C ASA (ALT) ASN, RD&A Navy IPO http://www.acq.osd.mil/ic/handbook.pdf USD (I) USD (P) DSCA DSS
14
08/08 Overseas Armaments Cooperation Offices Army – Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Japan, Singapore, UK Navy – UK, Japan, Chile Air Force – UK, Japan, Germany, France
15
08/08 Armaments Cooperation Countries with dedicated armaments cooperation personnel: Australia Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary India Israel Italy Japan Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Poland Romania Singapore South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom
16
08/08 Armaments Cooperation SAMM C2.5.2.7.2 Personnel dedicated to Armaments Cooperation are not funded by Security Assistance Functional guidance from USD (AT&L) International Cooperation Under supervision of SCO Chief SCO Chief responsible if no dedicated Armaments Cooperation personnel assigned
17
08/08 Armaments Cooperation SCO Functions – SAMM C2.T3 Advisor to US National Armaments Director (NAD) DoD liaison for planning defense industrial development in host nation POC for host MOD and foreign firms on DoD acquisition and logistics practices Oversee cooperative arrangements Assist NDPC to evaluate host security POC for US defense industry visits
18
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
19
08/08 IEP Objectives Exchange of scientific and technical information in mutual interest areas to: Avoid duplication of R&D Access technological advances Identify areas for further collaboration Promote interoperability
20
08/08 IEP Policies Foreign R&D capabilities must contribute to satisfying a U.S. military requirement Conducted on a reciprocal, balanced basis Exchanges limited to narrowest subject area practicable Parties bear own costs No manufacturing or production data No loan/leases of equipment
21
08/08 IEP Participants Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Czech Republic Denmark Egypt Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Indonesia Israel Italy Japan Jordan Korea Luxembourg Malaysia Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Philippines Poland Portugal Singapore Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Turkey United Kingdom
22
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
23
08/08 ESEP Objectives Form a cadre of internationally experienced professionals Gain insight into other: research methods organizational management structures Cultivate future cooperative endeavors
24
08/08 ESEP Policies Career development PCS assignments for 1-2 years Generally at GS-12/13 or O-3 Level One-for-one exchange not required Not a training program
25
08/08 ESEP Agreements South Korea Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Singapore Sweden United Kingdom Australia Canada Egypt France Germany Italy Israel Japan
26
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
27
08/08 1. Commercially products or dual-use technology from domestic or international sources 2. Production or modification of already developed U.S. or Allied military systems or equipment 3. Cooperative development program with one or more Allied nations 4. New joint Service development 5. New Service-unique development Defense Acquisition System Order of Preference DoD Directive 5000.01
28
08/08 FCT Separate US funding source to test foreign equipment to determine if it will satisfy a US defense requirement Objectives: Improved capability Cost avoidance Reduce acquisition lead-times
29
08/08 Kerr Recovery Rope UK FCT Camo Netting (ULCANS) Sweden FCT Chem-Bio Detector UK/Germany FCT & MOU Smoke Grenade Launcher UK MOU Mine Clr/Actuate IS MOU & FCT Hunter/Killer Sight (cooler) Germany FCT Armor UK & Canada MOUs Ammunition Germany FCT Ammo Rack Germany MOU 120mm Gun Germany MOU Fire Control Canada MOU Chemical Decon Norway FCT M240 Machine Gun Belgium MOU
30
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
31
08/08 1. Commercially products or dual-use technology from domestic or international sources 2. Production or modification of already developed U.S. or Allied military systems or equipment 3. Cooperative development program with one or more Allied nations 4. New joint Service development 5. New Service-unique development Defense Acquisition System Order of Preference DoD Directive 5000.01
32
08/08 The DOD and a foreign defense ministry by written agreement jointly manage an RDT&E and/or production effort to satisfy a common requirement by sharing work, technology and costs Cooperative RDT&E and Production Definition
33
08/08 Foreign Partner JSF Investments 1.United Kingdom $2.000B 2.Italy $1.000B 3.Netherlands $0.800B 4.Turkey $0.175B 5.Canada $0.150B 6.Australia $.0150B 7.Denmark $0.125B 8.Norway $0.125B Total$4.525B
34
08/08 Joint R&D Joint/Concurrent Production + = MOU Cooperative RDT&E and Production
35
08/08 Cooperative Production
36
08/08 F-16 Multinational Co-production
37
08/08 Co-production Cooperative Development and Production U.S. R&D U.S. Initial Production FMS History Co-assemble Co-produce LOA MOU Technical Data MOU + Joint R&D Joint/Concurrent Production Joint Management Co-production vs. Cooperative Development and Production
38
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
39
08/08 Defense Trade Two Way Street Two Way Street
40
08/08 Domestic Preference Laws Discriminate against foreign offers Buy American Act of 1933 Non-DoD, Large US business – Add 6% to foreign offer Non-DoD, Small US business – Add 12% to foreign offer DoD, Any US business – Add 50% to foreign offer
41
08/08 Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Egypt Finland Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey U.K. France Germany Greece Israel Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Reciprocal Procurement MOUs DFARS 225.872-1
42
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
43
08/08 Categories of logistic support, supplies, services: Base Operations Support Storage Services Billeting Transportation Petroleum/Fuel Spare Parts Repair Services Food Facility Use Training Services Clothing Medical Services Port Services Communications International Cooperative Logistics
44
08/08 Types of agreements: Cooperative Military Airlift Agreements (CMAAs) War Reserve Stocks for Allies (WRSA) Host Nation Support (HNS) Acquisition & Cross-Servicing Agreements (ACSAs) Cooperative Logistics
45
08/08 Acquisition & Cross- Servicing Agreements (ACSA) Bilateral international agreements that permit cooperative logistics support for exercises or contingencies DoD Directive 2010.9 CJCS Instruction 2120.01 Payment options Cash Replacement in Kind Equal Value Exchange
46
08/08 PACOM(9) PACOM (14) JFCOM (2) NORTHCOM (1) CENTCOM (11) SOUTHCOM (7) SOUTHCOM (10) Australia Korea Japan Thailand * EUCOM (44) Denmark Belgium Hungary Luxembourg Bahrain Jordan Tonga 101 Agreements (*39 w/expiration dates) Rep of Macedonia Portugal Canada ACT Argentina Estonia Finland Slovakia Latvia Peru * New Zealand* Singapore Ukraine Switzerland South Africa Senegal Bulgaria Austria Albania Pakistan* Tajikistan* Israel Gabon Greece Tunisia Turkey Czech Republic Poland Italy Spain NAMSO SHAPEUnited Kingdom Bosnia & Herzegovina* Germany France Netherlands Norway Lithuania Romania* Georgia* Qatar* Philippines* Colombia* El Salvador* Croatia * ACSAs by Combatant Commander Uzbekistan* UAE Mongolia * Honduras* Dominican Republic* Botswana* Cape Verde* Moldova* Kazakhstan* JS J4 (1) Afghanistan* Ireland* Chad* Slovenia* Armenia* Uganda* Rwanda*Ghana* Malaysia Azerbaijan* Lebanon DROC Mali Serbia Oman* Sri Lanka* Mozambique Sweden* Montenegro AFRICOM (20) Liberia Burkina Faso Mauritania Djibouti* Ethiopia*Benin NicaraguaIndonesia Maldives Date: 12 October 2011 Brunei* Chile* Ecuador*Uruguay* Sao Tome & Principe NAMO NC3O
47
08/08 IAC PROGRAMS 1.Information (Data) Exchange Program 2.Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program 3.Foreign Comparative Testing Program 4.Cooperative RDT&E & Production Programs 5.Defense Trade 6.Cooperative Logistics
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.