1. Triggers, Fitters and VErtex LOcators Manchester Christmas Meeting 2010 Adam Webber 21/12/10 VELO

2. Hlt2Mu2Tracks 1 The trigger:  L0 (hardware)  Hlt1 – Inclusive (software)  Hlt2 – Inclusive/Exclusive (software) The Idea: Extend on Hlt2MuTrack… B μ D/K/… π/k ν The problem:  Not very good efficiency with current triggers  Efficiency is split between ~3 Hlt1 and ~5 Hlt2 lines Signal Efficiency (± 0.1 %) Efficiency w.r.t. previous trigger level (%) L072.9 Hlt159.781.9 Hlt251.786.6  Rectangular cuts optimisation on several million real MinBias events and several thousand signal MC (from several different channels) L0 (40->1MHz) Hlt1 (1k->30kHz) Hlt2 (30->2kHz)

3. Status 2 An optimistic outlook (loose L0): ChannelEfficiency/Rate (%) (each w.r.t previous trigger level) L0Hlt1Hlt2Topo (“or” of all) Hlt2 Mu2Tracks Bd->DsMuNu78.883.058.592.9 Bs->DsMuNu80.884.963.596.1 Bd->K*MuMu89.889.665.889.9 Bs->JpsiPhi95.892.059.894.7 MB (mu=2.016.64.522.14.1 A more realistic outlook (tighter L0): ChannelEfficiency/Rate (%) (each w.r.t previous trigger level) L0Hlt1Hlt2Topo (“or” of all) Hlt2 Mu2Tracks Bd->DsMuNu70.186.158.379.0 Bs->DsMuNu72.487.763.685.9 Bd->K*MuMu88.789.960.189.7 Bs->JpsiPhi94.493.659.887.6 MB (mu=2.06.46.71.765.3

4. B,B lifetime ratio 70s0 The Plan:  Take the ratio of Bs and B yields in bins of lifetime  Signal trigger acceptance functions cancel when we take their ratio  Separate B from Bs by fitting the mass spectrum  (make these plots nicer…)

5. 2 Highs and Lows  Observed: Time  Expected: Happiness My

6. 2 Highs and Lows  Observed: An exponential decay followed by a rise at larger proper lifetime Time  Expected: An exponential decay Happiness My

7. 2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B followed by a rise due to cosh(ΔΓ s t) term.  Observed: An exponential drop followed by a rise at larger proper lifetime  More than we bargained for. From a simple fit we can measure ΔΓ s as well as the ratio of B lifetimes. “Fantastic” – we said. Time Happiness My

8. 2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B with increasing proper lifetime.  Observed: An rapid rise followed by a drop at larger proper lifetime  The reality: I plotted #B/#Bs instead of #Bs/#B. Correcting this flips our plot… Time Happiness My

9. 2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B with increasing proper lifetime.  The reality: used exp(-Γ)=exp(-τ) instead of exp(-Γ)=exp(-1/τ) by accident… Time Happiness My  Observed: An rapid rise followed by a drop at larger proper lifetime  Conclusion: Unexpected bias in selection. Requires investigation.

10. VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 1: Lower sensor operational voltage: V Resolution = pitch/√12

11. VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 1: Lower sensor operational voltage: smaller V Resolution = weighted mean of several strips

12. VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 2: Lower strip threshold. Make more multi-strip clusters. Proof of principle: Would be here if I’d gone home after dinner last night…

13. Merry Christmas!!! I also grew a pretty good moustache. But it had to go after some classic quotes from my girlfriend: “I think I love you a little bit less” “It makes me feel sick” and