1. Funders typically looking for applications to demonstrate: Evidence of need for what you are proposing, and why your project is the right approach to meeting this need A set of outcomes linked directly to meeting this need Activities which contribute towards these outcomes Outcome based indicators and tracking Measuring success and learning as project proceeds Each process different and what is required/allowed to be submitted usually tightly restricted, so hard to say exactly what to use and where, but: Taking an outcomes based planning approach in submissions is likely to prove increasingly important Supported by evidence from previously developing, delivering and monitoring outcomes based programmes Developing and using evidence portfolios

2. Big Lottery Fund: How to make a good application You must be able to demonstrate Your project outcomes meet an identified need and helps to achieve the changes we want to make through the area of investment relevant to your project – and the need for your project must be backed up with evidence Your organisation can deliver the project well and achieve the proposed project outcomes Your evidence of need should be Relevant to the project you are applying to us for, specific to your client group and in proportion to the size and scale of your project Show why your project is the most appropriate way to meet the identified need Show user involvement in project development Our assessment of your application is based around your outcomes – how well your outcomes are meeting an identified need, how likely you are to achieve them and how well they fit with the aims of our funding. Outcome Indicators will tell us how you will measure progress. http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/pub_make_good_application.ppt Also includes a useful slide on writing good outcomes

3. Outcomes based planning approaches Theory of Change was the outcome based planning approach used in CPAL (and NPC model) Ultimate outcomes Long term outcome Supporting outcomes Activities Key performance indicators Big Lottery refers to the CES planning triangle Aim: the overall point of your project Intended outcomes: the difference you intend to make or the change you aim to bring about for your beneficiaries, the community or the environment Activities: the main services and activities you plan to carry out - what those working on your project will actually do, week by week Plus outcome indicators http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/er_eval_explaining_the_difference.pdf OBA (Outcomes Based Accountability)/Turning the Curve approaches Share a lot of common ground with Theory of Change, but without placing the same emphasis on the outcomes pathway Outcomes pathway

4. Making the case Able to answer the following questions for one of your projects What was it seeking to achieve – the overall aim/long term outcome How you knew it was needed What outcomes it set out to deliver - supporting outcomes/intended outcomes What it achieved, how you measured this and over what period Evidence standing by and ready to go Focus groups and interviews Impact assessments and/or distance travelled approaches Case studies Photographs, videos, press releases and/or press coverage Existing evaluations, impact assessments or return on investment/value for money studies Tailored to meet the needs of individual prospective funders

5. Making the case Outline one of your projects to a health funder or community capacity building funder What was it seeking to achieve overall? How did you know it was needed? What outcomes did it set out to deliver (supporting outcomes/intended outcomes)? What did it achieve, how did you measure this and over what period?