Download presentation
Published byMelvin Rose Modified over 8 years ago
1
Health Literacy among Urban Residents in Klang Valley, Malaysia
Tin Tin Su 1, Emma Mohamad 2, Hazreen A Majid 1 1. Centre for Population Health (CePH) Faculty of Medicine University of Malaya 2. School of Media and Communication Studies Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2
Content Health Literacy among Low-income Urban Residents
Cancer Awareness & Anticipated Delay in Help Seeking Practice of reading food labelling Awareness of own health status II. Exploring Health Literacy by using (HLS-Asia-Q) among urban residents in Klang Valley
3
I. Health Literacy Among low- Urban Residents
“PARTNER” Participatory Action Research Through Negotiation & Empowerment of Residents A cross sectional survey was carried out in four community housing projects in Kuala Lumpur during The majority of residents belong to low income groups.
4
The survey recruited a population-representative sample by simple random sampling.
833 households were selected. Total participants for questionnaire survey were 3722 2,360 adults (at least 18 years old) from selected households were invited for medical screening From invitees, 1,192 (50.5%) participated in medical screening
5
Cancer awareness and anticipated delay in help seeking
The awareness of cancer symptoms, anticipated delay and barriers in health seeking were accessed by using the validated Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) questionnaire. The CAM questionnaire was developed by Cancer Research UK, University College London, Kings College London and Oxford University in 2007–08.
6
Socio demographic characteristics of adult participants
Age: 39.8 year (SD 16.4) Gender: Male (47.1%) Majority are Malay (82.4%) Income: 57% of households’ monthly income < RM 2,000/month
7
Awareness of cancer signs and symptoms
Assessed by prompted and unprompted questions (unprompted) there are many warning signs and symptoms of cancer. Please name as many as you can think of:………………. (prompted) Do you think an unexplained lump or swelling could be a sign of cancer? ……persistent unexplained pain , persistent cough or hoarseness(changes in voice) ………….
8
Awareness of warning signs and symptoms
Unprompted (Recall) (%) Prompted (Recognition) Yes No Don’t Know Unexplained Lump or Swelling 18.4 61.0 20.6 62.0 23.6 14.5 Persistent Unexplained Pain 9.5 69.9 56.3 26.5 17.2 Unexplained Bleeding 7.1 72.2 20.7 52.2 29.8 18.0 Persistent Cough or Hoarseness (Changes in Voice) 1.1 78.3 39.1 37.8 23.1 Persistent Change in Bowel or Bladder 0.3 79.1 33.2 40.0 26.9 Persistent Difficulty Swallowing 0.1 79.3 37.7 37.9 24.4 Changing in Appearance of a Mole 34.6 42.2 23.2 Soar that Does not Heal 36.7 47.0 16.3 Unexplained Weight Loss 1.9 77.6 20.5 44.6 33.4 22.0 22.1% has 0 knowledge on warning sign and symptoms
9
Anticipated delay in seeking care
If you had a symptom that you thought might be a sign of cancer, how soon would you contact a doctor to make an appointment to discuss it? 589 (25%) of the participants had anticipated delay (>2 week) in help seeking
10
Components of Help-Seeking Barriers (n=2360)
Yes (%) No (%) Don’t Know (%) Emotional Barriers Too Embarrassed 14.5 77.3 8.3 Too Scared 26.5 65.0 8.5 Worried What Doctor Will Find 21.7 69.8 8.6 Service Barriers Worried about Wasting Doctor’s Time 5.0 86.4 Difficult to Talk with Doctor 8.9 82.5 Difficult to Make an Appointment 11.2 80.3 Practical Barriers Too Busy 14.7 76.7 Many Things to Worry About 11.5 58.5 30.0 Difficult to Arrange Transport 8.1 83.4
11
Logistic Regression :Predicting Delay in Help-Seeking controlling socio-demographic characteristics
Adjusted OR (CI) Prob. Symptom Knowledge 0.80 (0.77, 0.84) <0.000 Emotional Barriers None Reference At Least One 2.20 (1.71, 2.83) Service Barriers 1.26 (0.92, 1.73) 0.144 Practical Barriers 0.95 (0.70, 1.28) 0.739
12
Practice of Reading Food Labelling
Reading and Understanding Food Label (N=1624) HHH Spouse of HHH Reading food label/nutritional information 67% 75% Understanding food label 53% 59%
13
Types of Food label read (multiple response)
14
Awareness of own health status
Known Hypertension (HPT) : Hypertension diagnosed by doctor or medical staff Among 18 years and above Frequency Percent HPT_Not diagnosed 2153 89.6 HPT_Diagnosed 250 10.4 Total 2403 100.00 *Prevalence of known Hypertension NHMS 4 (2011) : 12.8 %
15
Participants with high BP Known HPT Unknown (undiagnosed)HPT
Finding from medical screening PPR Participants with high BP Known HPT Unknown (undiagnosed)HPT Kerinchi 182 46 (25%) 136 (75%) Seri Cempaka 58 11 (19%) 47 (81%) Pantai Ria 87 25 (29%) 62 (71%) Seri Pantai 15 (17%) 72 (83%)
16
Known Diabetic (DM) : Diabetes which had been confirmed by any medical personnel
Among 18 years and above Frequency Percent DM Not Diagnosed 2207 91.8 DM_Diagnosed 196 8.2 Total 2403 100.00 *Prevalence of known diabetes NHMS 4 (2011) : 7.2 %
17
Results from medical screening
Mean Std. Deviation Random Blood Sugar 6.51 3.70 Random Blood Sugar Male Female Frequency Percent <5.6 263 368 631 52.9 198 266 464 38.9 >11 39 51 90 7.6 Missing 7 0.6 Total 1192 100 Prevalence of DM (both known and unknown) in NHMS IV: 15.2%
18
Conclusions Health Literacy among low income-urban population are quite low (symptoms awareness, reliance for taking care own health) Individuals with adequate degree of health literacy are able to take responsibility of their own health, as well as their families and surrounding communities. Health promotion campaigns are essential for low income population to improve their health literacy. This effort could reduce help-seeking barriers and promote early diagnosis of diseases.
19
Current status of health literacy study in Malaysia
No national or population representative data on general health literacy Available data focused on either particular study population and/or specific disease – mostly show poor health literacy This presents a huge potential and benefit for GHL study to be conducted nationwide in Malaysia
20
II. Exploring Health Literacy by using (HLS-Asia-Q) among residents in Klang Valley
600 participants from Klang Valley (Kuala Lumpur & Selangor) Purposive Quota Sampling: 200 for each ethnicity (Malay, Chinese and Indian) The questionnaire was translated to Malay (national language) The demographic part (19 questions) and health literacy component (47 items)
21
Components of questionnaire on Health Literacy
Access Information for Health Care, Disease Prevention, Health Promotion Understand Information for Appraise Information for Apply Information for 3 to 5 questions under each domain and answers can be scored as 1-4, very difficult , fairly difficult, fairly easy, very easy
22
Access Information for Understand Information for
Health Care Disease Prevention Health Promotion Total score 16 20 12 Mean 11.5 11.95 14.45 11.57 9 11.85 Median 15 Percent of respondents ≤ 50th percentile score (low health literacy) 9.8% 7.17% 7.83% 7.5% 8.67% 7.33%
23
Appraise Information for
Apply Information for Health Care Disease Prevention Health Promotion Total score 16 20 12 Mean score 11.09 14.12 8.97 12.07 8.58 11.87 Median score 11 14 9 Percent of respondents ≤ 50th percentile score (low health literacy) 12.33% 11% 7.33% 4.16% 11.16% 9.17%
24
On going study: Parental health literacy and health status of adolescents
1) To measure health literacy among parents of Malaysian adolescents 2) To identify the association of parental health literacy and life style behavior such as smoking, alcohol drinking, diet and physical activity among adolescents 3) To assess the correlates of parental health literacy and body composition indices such as body mass index, body fat percentage, waist circumference, among Malaysian adolescents 4) To identify the association of parental health literacy and cardiovascular risk factors such as cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid level among Malaysian adolescents
25
Sample size: 1500 school children from 15 schools (urban 10; rural 5)
Study Area: Central and North Zone of Peninsular Malaysia Study Population: School Children of Form 1, aged 13 Study Design: Prospective cohort study of school children Sampling: Stratified random sampling States WPKL Selangor Perak Urban Rural Total # of Schools 96 187 74 114 124 Total # of Sample Schools 3 4 2 Sample size: school children from 15 schools (urban 10; rural 5) 7/3/2013
26
MyHEARTs Study: Adolescent Cohort
2012 MyH I 13yr N = 1361 2014 MyH II 15 yr N = 1247 2016 MyH III 17 yr 2026 MyH 2026 27y 930 old, 344 new 7/3/2013
27
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.