1. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 (a) Microchannel configuration with the orifice throat and exit area and experimental placement of the kidney stone and (b) experimental setup Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Flow rate as a function of inlet pressure Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Bubble cloud emerging from the probe exit at different cavitation intensities with assessment of effective range of bubbles and assessment of effective volume Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Penetration length as a function of cavitationnumber Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Effective volume as a function of cavitation number Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Experimental results of kidney stone amount (mg) as a function of time (min) at 9790 kPa pressure for the probe–specimen distances of 0.5, 2.75, and 7.75 mm Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Experimental results of kidney stone erosion rate (% min −1 with respect to the initial mass) as a function of time (min) at 9790 kPa pressure for the probe–specimen distances of 0.5, 2.75, and 7.75 mm Figure Legend:

8. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 Comparison of experimental erosion rate with predictions of the proposed correlation Figure Legend:

9. Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Probe-to-Specimen Distance Effect in Kidney Stone Treatment With Hydrodynamic Cavitation J. Med. Devices. 2015;9(3):031001-031001-8. doi:10.1115/1.4030274 (a) SEM image of an unexposed sample and (b) SEM image of exposed sample (exposed for 20 min at a probe–specimen distance of 2.25 mm) Figure Legend: