Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKristopher Henry Modified over 8 years ago
1
ANXIETY AND AGE
2
There is a difference in results found in lab experiments and in real life. Recall after real life events is generally better. Sympathetic arousal caused by acute stress enhances memory. This is likely to be greater in real life situations
3
When people know they are taking part in lab experiments they may not feel the same anxiety that they do in real life. This may mean that their recall does not reflect the recall which would be found in a real life situation. This means that such experiments lack ecological validity because if the setting was changed the results would be different.
4
Loftus attempted to deal with this by creating a situation which was thought to be real. While participants were waiting for the experiment to begin (or so they though) they witnessed an altercation between two people in a room. Condition 1 – the interchange was friendly and a man emerged with greasy hands holding a pen Condition 2 – the interchange was hostile and a man emerged holding knife with blood on it. Participants were less able to correctly identify the man in a photo in condition 2.
5
Loftus concluded that a weapon narrows the focus of the witness.
6
Recall after real life bank robberies is better than recall in artificial situations. This could be because participants in experiments take it less seriously and feel less anxiety.
7
Found that people who had been threatened during bank robberies had better recall than onlookers. This could be due to the level of anxiety.
8
It could be that there is an optimum level for anxiety. Recall improves up to a point and then declines if anxiety continues to increase.
9
Lab studies might not reflect what happens in real life Participants may respond to demand cues which may affect their behaviour and recall This means that the findings won’t necessarily be generalisable to real life situations due to a lack of ecological validity. There may be a certain degree of anxiety in participants taking part in experiments due to wanting to do well etc. But this may not reflect the level of anxiety they would feel in a real life situation. It may be more or less depending on what is happening. Taking part in a lab experiment may result in participants not taking it as seriously as they would in real life.
10
There is conflicting evidence about the effects of age on EWT.
11
Children are very keen to take part But often pick out the wrong person. Made more errors than college students
12
Young children can be accurate in their witness testimony But are susceptible to leading questions. They need questioning carefully. Gordon et al. 2001
13
Believes that differences between child and adult witnesses are overstated. Children can provide very accurate testimony if care is taken when interviewing
14
Studied 16-33 year olds 60 – 82 year olds No difference in recall after 35 minutes Significantly less recall for older witnesses after one week
15
Flin et al. (1992) Especially in children. Significant forgetting after 5 months compared to adults. Significant because court cases are often delayed
16
Yarney (1984) May be more prone to errors of recall than younger witnesses. 80% of elderly (70+) witnesses failed to mention that the attacker had a knife compared to 20% of younger adults.
17
Elderly participants were more susceptible to the effects of misleading information compared to middle-aged participants.
18
Used 3 age groups 18-25 35 – 45 55 – 78 The young and middle- aged were significantly more accurate at identifying photos But each age group were better when identifying photos from their own age group
19
18 – 44 year olds were more confident in their recall than 45 – 65 year olds when asked to recall physical characteristics of a young woman to whom they had spoken for 15 seconds just 2 minutes earlier. No difference in the accuracy of their recall..
20
The same criticisms can apply as before with reference to the artificiality of lab experiments. Care should be taken when using children in experiments to ensure that they are not put under stress. Deception may be needed in some experiments on EWT which also presents an ethical issue. Researcher bias may affect the way participants are questioned and this may affect the result. Individual differences should be considered as people vary in their memory ability.
21
It is wrong to say that old people make poorer witnesses. This could be a socially sensitive issue if it results in a particular age group being labelled as untrustworthy when it comes to remembering things. Overall, it is important to note that the very young and the elderly are more susceptible to misleading information and so should be questioned very carefully.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.