Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Superconducting Tunneling Through Spin Filter Barriers Mark Blamire, Avradeep Pal, Jason Robinson, Zoe Barber Cambridge University Department of Materials.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Superconducting Tunneling Through Spin Filter Barriers Mark Blamire, Avradeep Pal, Jason Robinson, Zoe Barber Cambridge University Department of Materials."— Presentation transcript:

1 Superconducting Tunneling Through Spin Filter Barriers Mark Blamire, Avradeep Pal, Jason Robinson, Zoe Barber Cambridge University Department of Materials Science Device Materials Group

2 Non-magnetic tunnel barrier – spin transport determined by electrodes only – Magnetic electrodes => TMR – Non-magnetic electrodes => no spin polarised currents Superconducting state – no spin polarised currents Ferromagnetic Insulator tunnel barrier – Barrier height spin-split below the Curie temperature – Tunneling probability for one spin sign exponentially favoured – Almost 100% spin polarised current Tunnel barriers & spin filters E ex

3 GdN films A magnetic semiconductor / insulator Reactive sputtering from Nb & Gd targets Magnetic properties depend strongly on N stoichimetry Very sensitive to oxygen levels during growth Senapati et al., PRB 83, 014403 (2011).

4 Spin-filter Josephson junctions

5 Non-Ambegaokar-Baratoff temperature dependence

6 NbN/GdN/NbN junctions

7

8 2 nd harmonic current-phase relation

9 I c (H) for different harmonics IcIc φ/φ 0 12 I=I 0 sinϕ 3 I=I 0 sin2ϕ H

10 NbN/GdN/NbN junctions Hysteretic I c (H) because of barrier magnetism SUST 26, 055017 (2013)

11 Extracting M(H) loop Add a hypothetical M(H) to H and calculate I c (H). Adjust M(H) parameters until fit optimised Distortion of first lobe (H 2+ ) minimal because GdN has large remanent moment H 2+ H 2- 2H 1

12 Effect of GdN thickness H 2- tends to zero as barrier moment increases H 1 and H 2+ halve once barrier magnetism established Eventually peak height ratio recovers to perfect Fraunhofer pattern Dominant 2 nd harmonic in current-phase relation

13 Models of spin filter Josephson junctions Symmetric spin mixers – angles α, β

14 Fit to data

15 Triplet pair generation by single spin-mixer? Singlet Triplet

16 fits

17 Tafuri Group data

18 So, what do we know? Spin filter Josephson junctions show reduced I c R n & non- Ambegaokar-Baratoff temperature dependence. ✓ Dominant 2 nd harmonic current-phase relationship. ✓ Asymmetric triplet pair formation requires asymmetric interfaces. Some evidence….. Fabricated S/FI/N junctions to explore single NbN/GdN interface

19 NbN/GdN/TiN non-superconducting

20 Zeeman-split S/I/N tunneling

21 Field-dependence offset Intrinsic Zeeman-splitting at NbN/GdN interface

22 Real device structure NbN ξ NbN ~ 5 nm Zeeman GdN NbN 3 nm

23 Zero-bias conductance peak

24 So, what do we know? Spin filter Josephson junctions show reduced I c R n & non- Ambegaokar-Baratoff temperature dependence. ✓ Dominant 2 nd harmonic current-phase relationship. ✓ Zeeman-split NbN/GdN interface. ✓ Evidence for some strongly unconventional superconductivity. ✓

25


Download ppt "Superconducting Tunneling Through Spin Filter Barriers Mark Blamire, Avradeep Pal, Jason Robinson, Zoe Barber Cambridge University Department of Materials."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google