1. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Configuration Steering Board Template Charts Program Title Rank, Name Office Symbol … for Annual Review/Event Driven CSBs Updated July 2014 Pre - MS B Programs

2. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e EXAMPLE “Why We Are Here Today” 2 Information to include: Reference Tech Baseline List of Deltas/Changes Approved by PEO or SAE Cost of Deltas/Changes to Program and AF Enterprise Rationale for Deltas/Changes Proposed recommendations to change the program BLUF Example: “Program” Increment III (98% expended) No significant development activity remaining “Program” Inc IV (focus of CSB) No funding vs requirements mismatches in program profile No change in requirements since Inc IV MS B, Apr 11 Potential descoping options See Notes Page

3. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3 DRAFT CH-53X UH-1/AH-1 (upgrades) JHSV JSF MH-60S MV22 GCCS-M JPALS DCGS-N CEC SSDS Mk 2 SSDS P3I MPF(F) LHA(R) Solid denotes current system Dash denotes future system Arrow to LHA(R) denotes supports LHA(R) Arrow from LHA(R) denotes LHA(R) supports Indicates program are interdependent No known issues affecting inter-related programs Resolvable interface issues affecting programs Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs Interrelationships, Dependencies and Synchronization with Complementary Systems Same as DAES slide See Notes Page

4. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 4 Program X Schedule Sample Chart FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Requirements ICD Acquisition IOC RIT MDD Annual X-Plan Milestones AFRB Requirements Review/Management Board FDDR MAIS List Design & Integration System/Architecture Studies Procurement Operations & Support Test & Evaluation OUE OT&E FOC Strategic & focused on Milestones and critical events between milestones. Must communicate schedule changes Highlight Critical Path See Notes Page

5. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Funding vs. Requirement Assessment See Notes Page Same as DAES slide

6. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 6 Requirements Changes (+/-) since last CSB New / Refined Requirements Threshold / Objective Rationale for New Req. Current Est. Weight7500 lbs / 6600 lbs AMC/A3/5 identified new weight requirement updated to allow transport in … 7650 lbs Resolution7 cm / 5 cm New threat identified by xxxx and being worked through AFROC that … 6.8 cm Etc. Do not limit to just new KPPs/KSAs or changes to CDD/CPD. Also, include updates or refinement to requirements identified by the User or other organizations See Notes Page

7. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Requirements/Affordability Analysis Programs need to provide information on any design/requirements trades that have been conducted to evaluate cost/schedule vs. performance CSB may review draft requirement documents State your affordability goals (see 5000.02 encl 2-7) Include charts depicting curves showing how cost/schedule vary with performance/capability and showing where the current requirement/design parameter falls on the curve Address any issues regarding how needed Military Utility/Capability play in the design/requirements trades 7 See Notes Page

8. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 8 Potential Descoping Options Option User Capability Assessment and Perf Impact Impact to remaining program Investment to date Savings Defer Mode S Low-to-med impact in FY08-13 timeframe: Risks denial to European airspace No impact $12M spent of an estimated $36M effort $24M Total: $3M FY08 $8M FY09 $10M FY10 $3M FY11 Reduce sensor resolutions by 50% Med impact in FY10-11 and High impact in FY12-21: Inability to … Changes critical path to xxxx; reduces schedule risk by four months $3M spent in risk reduction; total effort estimated at $87M $84M Total: $2M FY08 $7M FY09 $15M FY10 $23M FY11 $28M FY12 $9M FY13 Etc. * What would program descope to address a FUNDING CUT Provide three or four options based on input from user on requirements, impact to programs ability execute remaining program, and % of costs already invested See Notes Page

9. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 9 “Issues Opportunity” This is an opportunity to communicate/discuss program issues with the SAE Discuss affordability and requirements Discuss any issues that are of a particular concern to the PEO and PM (examples might be) OSD Oversight issues Funding instability Technical transition issues Congressional Interest New User unfunded requirements/refinements See Notes Page

10. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Backup Slides 10 AS REQUIRED

11. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e +6 mos Baseline Top Cost Drivers 1.A, % of program cost 2.B, % of program cost 3.C, % of program cost 4.D, % of program cost 5.E, % of program cost Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Cost Δ% to original baseline Cost Δ% to current baseline Schedule - IOC or FOC - (Next Major Evt) Performance (KPPs & select KSAs) KPP 1 KPP 2 KPP 3 KSA 2 KSA 5 NTO Technology Readiness Assessment N – no capability T – Threshold O - Objective +15% Critical Technologies Current Assessment Est @ Next Milestone Technology ATRL # Technology BTRL # Technology CTRL # Technology DTRL # Technology ETRL # Technology FTRL # Y +25% MS B Date: M/Yr MS C Date: M/Yr R G Y G +30%+50% R G G +10% Y +25% PAUC APUC PAUC APUC Projection Program Name See Notes Page G

12. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Program X Example: Cost vs. Msn Capability Tradespace Emerging Threat Scenarios 12 Previous Program Example NOT A MANDATORY FORMAT

13. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Program X Example: Path to Affordable Requirements 13 Previous Program Example NOT A MANDATORY FORMAT

14. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Program X Example: Anticipated FY13 Cuts Pending $13M FY13 SAC-D mark Sequestration cut = 9% of $101.4M FY13 - $450K FY12 undistrib. Descope Cap Demo C ~42% to manage sequestration FY13 cut 14 3DELRR Ledger$M FY13 Approved114.4 FY13 Mark(13.0) FY13 Sequester(8.7) FY13 Adj BA92.7 FY13 Rqd (EAC)(101.0) FY13 Delta(8.3) BLUF: Anticipated FY13 cuts are manageable with mod-low impact Contractor Costs ($M) PriorAprMayJunJulAug Nov Total KTR #129.41.71.2 0.81.736.0 KTR #224.72.82.01.91.32.034.7 KTR #326.83.31.41.30.91.535.2 Total80.97.84.64.43.05.2105.9 PDRs Demo C Demo C work ≤ $19.8M Previous Program Example NOT A MANDATORY FORMAT