Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Biomarkers from Dynamic Images – Approaches and Challenges

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Biomarkers from Dynamic Images – Approaches and Challenges"— Presentation transcript:

1 Biomarkers from Dynamic Images – Approaches and Challenges
Mike Hayball Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd (A Feedback PLC Company) Big Data, Multimodality & Dynamic Models in Biomedical Imaging Wednesday 9th March 2016, Isaac Newton Institute, Cambridge

2 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
Quantitative Imaging Quantitative imaging is the extraction of quantifiable features from medical images for the assessment of normal or the severity, degree of change, or status of a disease, injury, or chronic condition relative to normal. (Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance – QIBA) Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

3 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
Imaging biomarkers A quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) is an objective characteristic derived from an in vivo image MEASURED on a ratio or interval scale as indicators of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or a response to a therapeutic intervention. (Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance – QIBA) Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

4 Quantitative Dynamic imaging
Quantitative imaging biomarkers from time series of images: Nuclear Medicine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Transmission X-ray - Iodinated contrast X-ray Computed Tomography - Iodinated contrast Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Injected contrast Arterial Spin Labelling Diffusion Weighted Imaging Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

5 “Colour Perfusion” Imaging
Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

6 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
Present Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

7 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
History - Axel Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

8 Anatomy vs Function Conventional CT good resolution, poor function
PET/Nuclear Medicine Good Function, poor resolution Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

9 Anatomy and function Contrast Enhanced CT
good resolution, subjective function Functional CT Apply quantitative techniques to single location CT

10 Perfusion Imaging Fast injection of iodinated contrast
s images in seconds Assumptions CT number proportional to iodine concentration Retention time in tissue > time to peak Contrast pharmaceutically inert By Gccwang - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

11 Dynamic sequence

12 TDC generation time

13 Fick Principle (1) 𝑄 𝑡 =𝐹 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑎 𝑡 − 𝐶 𝑣 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 Well mixed volume Q(t)
FCa(t) FCv(t) 𝑄 𝑡 =𝐹 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑎 𝑡 − 𝐶 𝑣 𝑡 𝑑𝑡

14 Fick Principle (2) Well mixed volume Q(t) FCa(t) 𝑄 𝑡 =𝐹 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑎 𝑡 𝑑𝑡

15 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
Fick Principle (3) Assuming no outflow during the inflow phase Requires a fast injection of contrast Contrast accumulation is at peak when the arterial concentration reaches maximum 𝑄 𝑡 =𝐹 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑎 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑄(𝑡) 𝑑𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥 =𝐹 𝐶 𝑎 (𝑡) 𝑚𝑎𝑥 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

16 Perfusion Imaging Initial bolus Recirculation
Arterial enhancement following fast bolus injection

17 Perfusion Imaging Enhancement in a tissue voxel following bolus injection

18 Perfusion Maximum gradient
Comparison of integrated arterial TDC and tissue TDC

19 Perfusion Integrated artery Tissue TDC
Integrated artery and tissue TDC matched curves

20 Perfusion Perfusion = Maximum gradient in tissue
Maximum enhancement in artery

21 Sample Data

22 Region of interest analysis
80

23 Thresholding Threshold Applied

24 Smoothing Binomial smooth

25 Maximum enhancement Measures the peak enhancement for each pixel
Maximum enhancement (HU) 0.00 23.60 Measures the peak enhancement for each pixel Can be used as an indicator of blood volume

26 Time to maximum Measures the time of peak enhancement for each pixel
Time to maximum (s) 7.00 17.00 Measures the time of peak enhancement for each pixel Indicates time of arrival of the blood supply Can be used to diagnose stenosis

27 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
History – Miles et. al. Applications: Stroke imaging Cardiac imaging Liver imaging Oncology Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

28 Alternative approaches
Mullani-Gould Peak Method 𝐹= 𝐶( 𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ) 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑎 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 Similar approach to maximum gradient but requires removal of recirculation Deconvolution / constrained convolution More susceptible to noise Improved by additional time points (-> increased dose) Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

29 Example - brain perfusion
Perfusion (ml/min/ml) 1.00 Maximum enhancement (HU) 0.00 23.60 0.00

30 Example - abdominal perfusion

31 Example - myocardial perfusion
10 20 30 40 -100 100 200 300 400 Time(s) Time Density Curve HU RV LV Aorta

32 Example - myocardial perfusion
220 6.00 Perfusion (ml/min/ml) 1.5 ml/min/ml 2.0 ml/min/ml 1.2 ml/min/ml -180 0.00

33 Example - MR perfusion Time Density Curve Intensity Time(s) 10 20 30
10 20 30 40 50 -20 60 Time(s) Time Density Curve Intensity Right Ventricle Left Ventricle

34 Example - MR perfusion 2.00 0.00

35 CT DCE – acquisition and performance
1991 2016 Single slice acquisition 512x512 pixels per image 5mm slice Rotation time – 2s 10 – 20 time points < 10MB Storage Typical desktop CPU 33MHz – 0.05 GFlops < 8MB RAM Multi-slice detectors 512x512 pixels per image slice, 4-16cm “slab” Rotation time – 250s 20 – 40 time points < 6GB Storage Typical desktop CPU I7 - > 100 GFlops > 8GB RAM Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

36 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
CT DCE – processing 1991 2016 Transfer the data Identify inputs Create time-density curves For region of interest For pixels For each time-density curve Clean-up date Calculate derived parameters Present output Register the images Non-rigid deformation Breathing Cardiac motion Movement Segmentation Constrained convolution / deconvolution Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

37 CT DCE – why is it still here?
Simple to implement “Technologically robust” Source images unchanged Improvements extend applicability Sources of error Noise Motion Calibration (contrast response) Is it “perfusion”? Assumptions break down “gracefully” Consistent in regions with identical input Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company

38 Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company
Conclusions Big data – what is it? >1GB per study <10 derived value per study? Ideas often precede the capability Simplicity and reproducibility are important Adoption of new ideas takes time and patience Cambridge Computed Imaging Ltd, a Feedback PLC company


Download ppt "Biomarkers from Dynamic Images – Approaches and Challenges"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google