1. Rogerian Model not confrontational in methods; authors do not have an opponent, you have an audience in addition, you are not constructing an opinionated, true argument, but rather establishing a discussion this model builds bridges between two parties; acts as a mediator rather than combatant Rogerian discussions aim for compromise between two opposing views likewise, you seek validity in the audience’s views; heavy research is necessary to represent both sides

2. Rogerian Discussion Introduction 1. The writer should first gain the audience’s interest and provide the problem using neutral language; no bias should be shown towards either side. Show how the problem affects you both. Show where disagreement lies. 2. Determine what both parties are seeking as a result by providing common-held beliefs. With this effort, the writer is building common ground between the two sides. The writer is seen acknowledging the two sides of the discussion immediately, but without acting defensive nor showing opposition to the audience.

3. Rogerian Discussion Body 1. First, present a specific point of the audience. Be sure you are not using any accusatory words and phrases. Remember, compromise is the goal here, not to show logical fallacies in another’s viewpoints. Be sure to thoroughly represent your audience’s view in an accurate fashion. Be careful crafting this section; if displaying your audience’s view in an honest, fair manner cannot be achieved, the entire essay fails. 2. Indicate how the audience has a valid point. State your audience’s strengths in their argument.

4. Rogerian Discussion Body 3. Next, carefully provide your own point of view through objective language; supply analytical evidence which shows why you have made your choice in the discussion. Do not suggest your opinion is better. 4. Alternate discussion of the two points aiming to show concessions between the two sides using compare/contrast techniques.

5. Rogerian Discussion Conclusion 1. State a major commonality between the two versions of the discussion. Seek out an element in common between you and the audience to focus your closing discussion. Provide a sense of hope for resolution. 2. Propose how your audience could strengthen their position to allow you to agree with them. Then…

6. Rogerian Discussion Conclusion 3. —offer a plausible compromise, using your thesis statement in such a fashion that your audience sees you have willing to change a portion of your side of the discussion, aligning your beliefs to the audience’s view. Likewise, you also display an expectation that the audience also will change a portion their side of the discussion. The conclusion offers a benefit for both parties if both parties are willing to change.