1. Border Master Plan Laredo, Texas July 28, 2010  Laredo District  Coahuila  Nuevo León  Tamaulipas

2. Border Master Plan Welcome

3. Border Master Plan Meeting Objectives

4. Study objectives and approach Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) and Technical Working Group (TWG) function Outcome of first stakeholder meeting Data requirements of the Border Master Plan Breakout sessions Border planning/ consultancy studies Socio-economic data collected Port of entry/ transportation facility data collected Outstanding data

5. Border Master Plan Study Objectives and Approach

6. Study Team Jolanda Prozzi Jorge Prozzi Alejandra Cruz-Ross Dan Seedah Alejandro Martínez Claudia Centurión Lisa Loftus-Otway

7. Master Plan Objectives Design stakeholder process that is inclusive and ensure participation Increase understanding of POE and transportation planning processes on both sides of border Develop and implement plan to prioritize POE and transportation projects over short, medium, and long term Establish formal communication process among federal, state, regional, and local stakeholders on both sides of border

8. Study Approach Similar approach to CA Border Master Plan Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Technical Working Group (TWG)

9. Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) The Policy Advisory Committee will be mainly responsible for: Providing direction Approving the study parameters Reviewing and approving the criteria for the future evaluation of projects Attempting to incorporate findings and priorities into their own planning and programming processes Committing resources and staff to ensure the timely exchange of available information and data needed

10. Technical Working Group (TWG) The Technical Working Group will be responsible for: Providing requested information in a timely manner Making recommendations to the Policy Advisory Committee. Assisting with the selection of criteria to be endorsed and adopted by the PAC

11. Study Approach Task 1 – Establish Stakeholder Agency Participation and Commitment (Phase I) Task 2 – Conduct First Stakeholder Meetings Task 3 – Analyze Data, Consultancy Reports, and Documentation Task 4 – Conduct Second Stakeholder Meetings

12. Tasks Task 5 – Conduct Stakeholder Workshops Task 6 – Rank Priority Projects Task 7 – Finalize Documentation Task 8 – Disseminate Study Findings

13. Task 1 Stakeholder Participation and Commitment

14. Identify key stakeholder agencies involved in POEs and transportation planning and implementation Identify level of support for Border Master Plan Determine commitment and staff resources available for Border Master Plan development Verify feasibility of using CA Master Plan approach Identify omitted stakeholders Determine preferred means of communication

15. Stakeholder Agencies Agencies identified in Texas and Mexico at: Federal State Local Private / Trade Groups

16. Task 2 First Stakeholder Meetings

17. Policy Advisory Committee Review study objectives, resolve concerns, review proposed work plan and CA approach Finalize study area, planning horizon, and TWG membership Technical Working Group Meeting Share outcome of PAC meeting Obtain commitment to provide data

18. Task 3 Analyze Data, Consultancy Reports, and Documentation

19. Data, Consultancy Reports, and Documentation Obtain data and review consultancy reports Socio-economic and demographic profiles Inventory of current and future POEs and transportation facilities Document future demand and capacity needs Document planning process and review planning documents Review planning documents and describe planning process List proposed projects in planning documents Identify gaps and inconsistencies

20. Task 4 Second Stakeholder Meetings

21. Technical Working Group Meeting Documented planning processes Project inventory Incorporate comments and suggestions Policy Advisory Committee Meeting Share revised analysis Incorporate comments and suggestions

22. Task 5 Stakeholder Workshops

23. TWG Delphi Workshop Objective: reach consensus on criteria, scores, and weights to be used in Multi- Attribute Criteria (MAC) framework Outcome: used to rank individual projects PAC Workshop Present outcome and seek endorsement

24. Task 6 Rank Priority Projects

25. Use Multi-Attribute Criteria methodology to rank individual projects POE Roadway and interchange Rail projects

26. Task 7 Finalize Documentation

27. Prepare draft Border Master Plan Incorporate comments from TWG Submit final Border Master Plan for PAC approval Prepare brochure listing high priority projects Develop process to ensure continued dialogue

28. Task 8 Disseminate Study Findings

29. Disseminate Findings Develop Power Point presentation and disseminate study findings to agencies promoting border coordination U.S. JWC U.S.- Mexico Binational Group on Bridges and Border Crossings Border Liaison Mechanism Technical Commission Border Trade Advisory Committee U.S.- Mexico Border Governors Conference U.S. – Mexico Border Legislative Conference

30. Border Master Plan Outcome of First Stakeholder Meeting

31. Definition of Study Area

32. The Border Master Plan’s “Study Area” includes both: Area of Influence – Geographical area that might influence the transportation projects analyzed in the Focused Study Area Focused Study Area – Geographical bandwidth limiting the POE and transportation projects to be analyzed and prioritized by the Border Master Plan

33. Area of Influence Option A: Laredo District and its corresponding Mexican municipalities Option B: 60 miles – 100 kilometers North and South (“California Option”) Option C: 200 miles – 320 kilometers North and South

34. Focused Study Area Option A: 10 miles – 16 kilometers North and South (“California Option”) Option B: 15 miles – 24 kilometers North and South Option C: 25 miles – 40 kilometers North and South

35. Focused Study Area

36. Time Horizons

37. Projects will be grouped in three categories: Short term Medium term Long term

38. Short Term Option A: 1 year Option B: 3 years Option C: 5 years

39. Medium Term Option A: 5 years Option B: 10 years Option C: 15 years

40. Long Term Option A: 15 year Option B: 20 years Option C: 25 years

41. Border Master Plan Data Requirements

42. Obtain data and review consultancy reports Socio-economic and demographic profiles Inventory of current and future POEs and transportation facilities Document future demand and capacity needs Document planning process and review planning documents Review planning documents and describe planning process List proposed projects in planning documents Identify gaps and inconsistencies

43. Socio-economic and Demographic Profiles Current and projected population Employment Income Land use

44. Inventory of Current POEs and Transportation Facilities Inventory current transportation facilities (current and projected numbers) Number of lanes Average annual daily traffic (AADT) Peak period traffic volumes Share of truck traffic Level of Service (LOS)

45. Planned POEs and Transportation Facilities Planned transportation facilities (projected numbers) Project location Description of current facility configuration and planned improvements Level of Service (LOS) Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) before and after project completion Accident rate Direct or indirect linkage to POE Truck volumes/ share Year project becomes operational

46. Planned POEs and Transportation Facilities Planned transportation facilities (projected numbers) Current phase of the project Cost data and funding status Qualitative assessment of: – Environmental impacts/benefits – Community impacts/ benefits – Economic impacts/ benefits

47. Inventory of Current POEs and Transportation Facilities Inventory current POEs(current and projected numbers) Description of facility configuration Hours of operation Staffing levels and patterns Wait times Crossing and transportation volumes – Pedestrian, trucks, trains, and buses

48. Planned POEs and Transportation Facilities Planned POE improvements Project description Anticipated throughput by type of inspection lane after project completion Year of project completion Current phase of the project Cost data and funding status Qualitative assessment of: – Environmental impacts/benefits – Community impacts/ benefits – Economic impacts/ benefits

49. Planning Process Review planning documents Describe planning process Describe how projects are prioritized Describe funding sources Document public participation Document interagency coordination efforts

50. Breakout Sessions Review data variables Identify missing data variables Identify documents, studies, and consultancy reports that contain data Identify potential data sources Identify contacts/ stakeholders that should be interviewed to obtain missing data

51. Border Master Plan Breakout Sessions

52. Border Master Plan Administrative Matters and Follow-up Business

53. Border Master Plan Thank You/ Gracias!