1. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT MICE-US Experimental Contributions Daniel M. Kaplan Aug. 13, 2014

2. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Outline MICE Measurements Schedule Personnel & Activities Conclusions 2 August 13, 2014

3. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Demonstrating Ionization Cooling Recall cooling principle: good cooling requires –Low-Z absorber –Low β ⊥ at absorber Achievable via high magnetic field or field gradient Canonical angular momentum cancellation requires at least occasional field flips –Plan to measure emittance change vs input emittance, momentum, and β ⊥ in both flip & non-flip (“solenoid”) approaches ≈ 3 August 13, 2014

4. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Emittance Measurement Approach: Measure each muon precisely, both before and after cooling cell Off-line, form “virtual bunch” & compute emittances in and out August 13, 2014 4 5-plane SciFi Tracker as built (eff. diameter 1.5 mm) 1.5 mm/√12 Helical path of muon 7 350 µm fibers ganged into each readout channel

5. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Measurements to be Made Emittance-momentum matrix: Plan: study these 9 emittance-momentum cases, in both flip and non-flip modes, with multiple absorber materials and focusing strengths (ß) –need ~10 5 muons for each case ⇒ ≈ 3 ISIS user periods cooling heating equilibrium emittance 5 August 13, 2014 BzBz ß pzpz ε⊥ε⊥ Cooling vs. input emittance (200 MeV/c): Flip mode, 6-200: Solenoid mode 3-140 6-140 10-140 3-200 6-200 10-200 3-240 6-240 10-240

6. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT August 13, 2014 6 User periodStart DateEnd dateDuration (days) 117/3/201524/4/201533 22/6/201524/7/201554 38/9/201516/10/201538 43/11/201518/12/201545 (From Steve Boyd, U Warwick, MICE Operations Coordinator) Step IV Run Planning ISIS 2015 run plan (tentative): Various scenarios possible, depending on how the commissioning goes

7. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Run Plan : 2015 One scenario: August 13, 2014 7 ~Fully uses available time in 2015 (with some buffer)

8. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Run Plan : 2015 One scenario: August 13, 2014 8 ~Fully uses available time in 2015 (with some buffer) Alternate assuming polarity switch between user runs 1 st 2016 run also usable if necessary

9. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Longer-Term Schedule 9 August 13, 2014 MilestoneDates (Est.) 1 st demo of emittance reduction (Step IV)8/15 – 4/16 1 st demo of sustainable cooling (Step V)2/18 –

10. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Who Does What 10 International responsibilities: August 13, 2014

11. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT US MICE Contributions US-built magnets: –Spectrometer Solenoids (SS) –Coupling Coil Solenoid (CC) US-built components & systems: –RF cavities, modules, ancillary hardware, & MTA prototype tests (DOE, NSF MRI) –All Tracker SciFi planes (DOE, NSF MRI) –SciFi Tracker readout system (DOE, NSF MRI) –EMR scintillator (DOE) –Ckov PID detectors (NSF MRI) –LH 2 absorber windows (DOE) –Solid absorbers (DOE) –Partial Return Yoke (PRY) (DOE) Cooling-channel optics design (R. Palmer et al.) (DOE) Software management –Controls & Monitoring –Offline 11 DOE } SSU (US) SSD (US) RFCC (US) DOE } Step IV PRY 1st MICE RF cavity @ MTA LiH Disk Absorber August 13, 2014

12. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Tracker DAQ Support (D. Adey) SS Tracker support frames Scintillating fibers 12 August 13, 2014 Tracker DAQ is a complex system 8k SciFi readout channels instrumented with cryogenic, VLPC photodetectors, needing temp. control to 9.0±0.05 K –Readout via DØ AFE-IIt modules, each controlled by 3 FPGAs Built originally as DØ spares, tested with IIT MICE help (NSF MRI) Need periodic testing, maintenance, and calibration –Its support is a US responsibility within MICE Status: Developed & tested Tracker installation into Spectrometer Solenoid

13. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Controls & Monitoring (P. Hanlet) August 13, 2014 13 C&M for small, simple devices (e.g., HV supplies) conceptually straightforward (though nontrivial in practice) Complex devices (e.g., superconducting magnets, LH 2 absorbers) call for more-complex “state machine” control –Ensure their operating parameters stay within desired limits –Appropriately handle possible error conditions Note: safety issues handled by separate PLC interlock system –C&M system intended only to ensure MICE operates as intended –Should Control, Monitor, log values, and sensibly handle off-normal values We use EPICS to standardize control of heterogeneous hardware from many groups

14. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Controls & Monitoring Run Control –MICE has many devices and subsystems that need to be in correct states in order to start and stop useful runs –To make shift-taking more straightforward, and reduce chances of operator error, these sequences should be automated & integrated –Job of MICE RunControl is to accomplish this task Integrates control of: –DAQ, Target, NC beamline, SC magnets, Tracker, absorbers, and (to do): Diffuser, (Step V) RF August 13, 2014 14

15. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT C&M Status Simple systems (≈ done): –Environmental monitoring (temps., humidity, radiation levels) –HV supplies new crate still in progress –Proton absorber –Diffuser State machines: –Done: Spectrometer Solenoids –In progress: Focus Coil, Decay Solenoid Absorber, conventional magnets, Target, Trackers (big job) –Future: CCM, RF RunControl: –Almost ready for Step IV Actively managed by MEMO –Activities on target for start of Step IV operations August 13, 2014 15

16. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT UPSTREAMDOWNSTREAM “Offline” Software (D. Rajaram) MAUS (MICE Analysis User System) software used both for offline analysis and simulation and for online analysis –Provides a unified, self-consistent, traceable framework for “everything we do” with MICE data Current status: with standard code from MAUS repository, –Can reconstruct data from every detector –Can simulate TOF, KL, and Tracker EMR and Ckov codes: integration in progress –Global track reconstruction: in development “Marrying” reconstructed tracks up- & downstream with particle ID US responsibilities: –Oversee, organize, and manage the international effort –Integrate Ckov software Actively managed by MEMO –Activities on target for start of Step IV operations August 13, 2014 16

17. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Who Does What (US, current) Fermilab: D. Adey, A. Bross, S. Feher, M. Leonova, M. Popovic –Tracker –Beamline, magnets, & RFCC BNL: R. Palmer, H. Witte –Lattice design –Partial Return Yoke LBNL: D. Li, T. Luo, M. Zisman –Magnets –RF UC Riverside: G. Hanson, C. Heidt –Tracker software & Monte Carlo –Controls & Monitoring software IIT: M. Drews, P. Hanlet, D. Kaplan, D. Rajaram, P. Snopok, Y. Torun, M. Winter –Experiment integration –Controls & Monitoring software –Offline software U Miss: L. Cremaldi, D. Sanders, D. Summers –Ckov detectors & analysis –RF –Absorber windows (both DOE - & NSF-supported) WhoMICE Admin. RoleC’tee A. BrossDep. Spokes.Exec. & Tech. Bds. P. HanletExpt. Integr. Scientist C&M Leader Tech. Bd. D. KaplanUS Rep.Exec. & Edit. Bds. D. RajaramOffline Software Head Color code: Faculty Research Faculty Scientist Postdoc Grad student Undergrad 17 August 13, 2014

18. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Budget Overview DOE/MAP currently supports Fermilab, BNL, LBNL groups & key personnel, including –Alan Bross, Fermilab: Deputy Spokesperson & Construction L1 Manager –Pierrick Hanlet, IIT: Expt Integration Scientist / Controls & Monitoring Head –Daniel Kaplan, MICE L2 Manager (partial release time) –Durga Rajaram, IIT: Offline Software Head Partial support for IIT/FNAL joint faculty –Pavel Snopok, Yagmur Torun Including corresponding travel and Common Fund contributions Plan: augment MICE Step IV operations & analysis with some effort from MICE construction and ionization cooling simulations efforts 18 August 13, 2014

19. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT MICE Completion Scenario Proposed MAP ramp-down: –Funds experiment operations through Step IV running and Step V component delivery Step IV running will demonstrate readiness for Step V of much of DAQ, C&M, and RunControl systems –All but RF (and its possible DAQ & Tracker impacts) US participation in Step V exploitation: –Will depend on GARD (and/or NSF) support –Note: MICE exploitation funding in place in UK, CH, Italy –Expected to continue through Step V exploitation EuCARD-2 “trans-national access” grants for work at RAL on MICE by EU collaborators –Strong statement of support from EuCARD SAC for MICE exploitation through Step V –We seek corresponding commitment in US 19 August 13, 2014

20. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Conclusions MICE aims to demonstrate the principles of sustainable ionization cooling …and thus lay the groundwork for neutrino factories (as well as muon colliders and low-energy cooled muon sources) …by ≈ 2018 Experimental support in the proposed plan… –Will enable us to successfully acquire Step IV data –Will provide support for key US experimental responsibilities Tracker & PID detector & DAQ support Step IV software and C&M readiness –Will provide for the transfer of Step IV results into the code framework required to simulate cold muon source capabilities Step IV operations form the foundation for the Step V cooling demonstration 20 August 13, 2014

21. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT Comment from IB The present request for DOE support focuses on Step IV experimental readiness – limited funding to exploit the experiment is unfortunate given the scope of the US contributions Furthermore this proposal does not provide support beyond the commissioning of Step V Highly desirable to obtain GARD and NSF support for Step V as well –In discussions with the agencies, the possibility of submitting proposals for this purpose was raised –Both NSF (Gonzalez) and DOE (Siegrist & Procario) have indicated willingness to consider these when the time comes August 13, 2014 21

22. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT MICE Papers 2 comprehensive MICE Step I papers, one recent: 1.D. Adams et al., “Characterisation of the muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2582 2.M. Bogomilov et al., “The MICE Muon Beam on ISIS and the beam-line instrumentation of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment,” JINST 7 (2012) P05009 1 more in progress: 1.“Measurement of the pion contamination in the MICE beam” Plus recent technical or conference papers... 22 August 13, 2014

23. MAP DOE Review (BNL, 12–14 Aug. 2014) | D. M. Kaplan, IIT More (Recent) MICE Papers 1.The Status of the Construction of MICE Step IV –P. Snopok, E. Overton –Proc. IPAC 2014, Dresden, Germany, TUPME011 2.Progress Towards Completion of the MICE Demonstration of Muon Ionization Cooling –A. Dobbs, D.M. Kaplan, P. Snopok –Proc. IPAC 2014, Dresden, Germany, THPRI030 3.Tuner System Simulation and Tests for the 201-MHz MICE Cavity –L. Somaschini et al. –Proc. IPAC 2014, Dresden, Germany, THPRI070 4.The detector system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) experiment –M. Bonesini,, for the MICE Collaboration –PoS EPS-HEP2013 (2014) 018 5.Progress towards completion of the MICE demonstration of ionisation cooling of muons –Y.I. Karadzhov, for the MICE Collaboration –PoS EPS-HEP2013 (2014) 017 6.Progress Towards Completion of the MICE Demonstration of Muon Ionization Cooling –D.M. Kaplan, for the MICE Collaboration –NuFact2013, e-Print: arXiv:1312.1626 [physics.acc-ph] 7.A totally active scintillator calorimeter for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE). Design and construction –R. Asfandiyarov, for the MICE Collaboration –Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A732 (2013) 451-456 8.MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurements –M. Leonova –Proc. IPAC'13, Shanghai, China, 2013, TUPFI054 9.The RF System for the MICE Experiment –K. Ronald et al. –Proc. IPAC'13, Shanghai, China, 2013, WEPFI066 10.Muon Cooling, Muon Colliders, and the MICE Experiment –D.M. Kaplan, for the MICE Collaboration –Proc. COOL'13 Conference, Murren, Switzerland, MOAM2HA01 11.Tuner System Simulation and Tests for the 201-MHz MICE Cavity –L. Somaschini et al. –Proc. NA-PAC2013, Pasadena, CA, US, WEPMA03 12.Status of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) –Y. Torun, M. Zisman –Proc. NA-PAC2013, Pasadena, CA USA, THPHO18 13.MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurements –M. Leonova –Proc. NA-PAC2013, Pasadena, CA USA, THPHO15 14.State Machine Operation of the MICE Cooling Channel –P. Hanlet, for the MICE Collaboration –Proc. CHEP2013, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 513 (2014) 012011 15.The MICE Run Control System –P. Hanlet, for the MICE Collaboration –Proc. CHEP2013, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 513 (2014) 012012 16.The Reconstruction Software for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Trackers –A. Dobbs, K. Long, E. Santos, D. Adey, P. Hanlet, C. Heidt –Proc. CHEP2013, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 513 (2014) 022008 17.MICE data handling on the Grid –J. Martyniak, for the MICE Collaboration –Proc. CHEP2013, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 513 (2014) 032063 23 August 13, 2014